Virgin Radio ads in Ottawa must come down!

Signatures 539 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 11 › »

1. 151
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 1, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 1, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 1, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Jennifer Toye on Feb 1, 2009

   Comments: I agree completely with the above response to the ad campaing for Virgin. The ads are tired, dated and offensive. It would be good practice for marketers to ask themselves how they would feel driving by such ads with THEIR teenage daughter, or son.

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Kristina Gervais on Feb 1, 2009

   Comments: I am so happy that I am not the only one who sees this ad as offensive!

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Suzanne Vezina on Feb 1, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Paul Lespage on Feb 1, 2009

   Comments: Brilliant marketing campaign. I am sure Sir Richard Branson is thanking you for all the free publicity you are bringing to Virgin radio. Long live the Gods of Rock and Mr. Branson.

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 1, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: T. Reid & J. McCarthy on Feb 1, 2009

   Comments: We cannot go back, so we must protest any message that is not respectful of women as intelligent and equal members in our society.

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments: I work in a high school as an educator. I was appalled to see this ad in the Sun newspaper as I was teaching a current event lesson. I was absolutely DISGUSTED.

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Shabari Banerji on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Jan Sterling on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Huguette Lussier Tremblay on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Sarah Sonne on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Zosia Judek on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments: I totally agree with writer Laura Sparling in her letter to the editor on February 1st, 2009.

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Kristina on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments: Totally unacceptable ad campaign.

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments: Not only are these ads a slap in the face of all women, but they are also insulting to men as they portray men as sexual predators and potentially rapists; notice that no effort is made to suggest that the pregnant young women were not raped.

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Simone Thibault on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments: This is a violation. I cannot believe that this type of advertizing still occurs in 2009.

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Lorene Taylor on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments: It is time that advertisers realize that it is 2009 and ads like this should not even be considered.

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Andrea Davidge on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Katherine Norenius on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Vanessa Dewson on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Emily Falvey on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Yolande Desjardins on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Melissa Dean on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments: Really, there are - or should be - standards for public decency, and this is simply rude and inappropriate. No moralistic soap boxing here, it just is simply in bad taste and offensive.

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Courtney Ghanie on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Bethany Schock on Feb 1, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Mary Helen Dean on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Bob Thomas on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Mary Tsikouras on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Anne Parent on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Lisa Lawr on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments: I would like to do a story on this - please call me. thanks, Steve fischer 613-288-6427

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Paulette Dozois on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Véronique Couillard on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Laura Doliner on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments: These ads are obnoxious and, I believe, harmful to women. It is particularly offensive to see them in publicly owned spaces, such as bus shelters.

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Robin Tytula on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments: This is why I like Majic 100

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Velvet on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Tunde Nemeth on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments: I am shocked.

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Angela Bressan on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Fran Klodawsky on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Natalie McClure on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments: These ads are appalling

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Tammy Alison White on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Debbie Sleeman on Feb 2, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 11 › »