Wildewood Homeowners Opposing Leaning Tree/Two Notch Connection Road

Signatures 33 total

Page: 1

1. 1
   Name: Janice Harper on May 19, 2003

   Comments: Please don't turn our family neighborhood into a thoroughfare. Please REJECT the proposed zoning changes. Thank you.

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Frank Rountree on May 19, 2003

   Comments: This is an unnecessary road which will overburden Wildewood's neighborhoods. I understand you would like to create PUDs in order to relieve traffic on the Two Notch corridor, but partially solving a problem by creating another is not a very good solution. The Wildewood community was not designed to accept this extra traffic. PLease do not allow this road as proposed. There is an alternative solution that provides access to Rosenberry Lane - a much better answer.

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Gary Bruce Thomas on May 19, 2003

   Comments: There is already a race track through Wildewood with Mallett Hill Road. It is getting impossible to get on Polo Road at certain times during the day. We do't need more cut-through traffic which will contribute to devaluation of our homes & traffic hazards to our kids.

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Mark Bender on May 19, 2003

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Julie Beasley on May 19, 2003

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Kristan Enoch on May 20, 2003

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Bob Baucom on May 20, 2003

   Comments: This proposed development will significantly increase traffic attempting to enter Two Notch Road at an already extremely busy area (at the Sonic where many people are changing lanes in an attempt to turn in by the Sonic/Office Depot/Ryans or going 50 yards farther to the light at the entrance to Wal-Mart. This additional traffic, some of which would attempt to cross two lanes of northbound traffic in order to turn left) is a potential disaster waiting to happen. No developer's personal or financial interest should ever take precedence over the safety of the public. I strongly feel that someone will either be seriously injured or killed as a result of this project being approved. Perhaps the only way to insure the safety of the public would be to put an additional traffic signal at that location & I'm fairly certain the SCDOT would not approve such a request due to the proximity of the Wal-Mart signal.

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Kathi Ellick on May 20, 2003

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Pete And Jackie Dyer on May 20, 2003

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Bryan Davies on May 20, 2003

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Jan Sowell on May 20, 2003

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Kay Burch on May 21, 2003

    Comments: As president of the Section VII WildeWood Homeowners' Association, I have received many phone calls and e-mails opposing any connecting road through any part of our neighborhood. No one believes that Doug Bridges can be trusted to keep his word on anything - especially after his self-serving use of his former position in the HOA.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Nancy Bailie on May 22, 2003

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Michael Bailie on May 22, 2003

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Maria Rebecca Roa on May 22, 2003

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: William Kuhne on May 23, 2003

    Comments: Traffic in the area is out of control with RBMG employees cutting thru the neighborhood. Council should use this request and further study the traffic problems in this neighborhood--since we pay a big part of the county budget in property taxes.

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Robert Leichtle on May 23, 2003

    Comments: I am opposed to the additional ingress/egress to our community. Develop the property but do not give access to the Wildewood community.

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Robert Leichtle on May 23, 2003

    Comments: I am opposed to the additional ingress/egress to our community. Develop the property but do not give access to the Wildewood community.

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Javier Alcorta on May 23, 2003

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Erik Hartvigsen on May 24, 2003

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: DAN SEIBERT on May 24, 2003

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: ROBIN SEIBERT on May 24, 2003

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Harold Blanchette on May 25, 2003

    Comments: Putting an access road into a residential neighborhood is only going to increase the incidents of speeding in a very quiet subdivision. There is no earthly reason to open up the neighborhood to outsiders whose only reason for driving in is to cut through. Anyone who wants to get to Two Notch now goes out to Polo and on to Two Notch. No good can come of this and if the neighbors in Wildwood don't want it, why should it be forced on them

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Anne Blanchette on May 25, 2003

    Comments: Don't degrade our quiet neighborhood for the sake of cut through

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Ted Rausch on May 26, 2003

    Comments: Keep in mind the poor track record of Heath Manning. Wildewood Section VI has gate that are about to be torn down by Kaye Evans since Heath Manning never recorded the deed to the association. Also, Heath never turned the roads in Section VI over to the County even though he said he did. End result is that the homeowners will have an enormous assessment to repair roads. The developers past behavior indicates they will selectively follow through with what ever they say. Some people might say this means they lie.

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Jose Vidal on May 26, 2003

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: COL(R) & MRS M. S. SULLIVAN on May 27, 2003

    Comments: We are very much opposed to the proposed road, which will link Leaning Tree to Two Notch Rd. We feel it is a safety issue, and see no reason why an additional access to Wilde Wood is necessary.

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Martin Roth on May 27, 2003

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Kathy And Peter Swanson on May 27, 2003

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Elizabeth Ward on May 27, 2003

    Comments: There are so many alternatives for entrance and exit of this proposed development, that would maintain the integrity of our beautiful WildeWood. I cannot believe that council would vote to put this development in jepardy. If it goes through, I would be wary of just what the council has in its best interests--or whose hands are in its back pocket.

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Teresa Evans on May 27, 2003

    Comments: I strongly oppose the creation of this "cut-through" road.

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Richard Maun, MD FACS on May 27, 2003

    Comments: Why would you vote For something that would so clearly make so many homeowners unhappy

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Julie Kasper on May 27, 2003

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1