Signatures 335 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 4, 5, 6, 7

1. 301
   Name: Patricia A Glasson on Dec 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display): Purdue University

   Comments (optional; will display):

   Flag
2. 302
   Name: Virginia Inness on Dec 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display):

   Comments (optional; will display):

   Flag
3. 303
   Name: Ann Pogany on Dec 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display): Oakland University

   Comments (optional; will display):

   Flag
4. 304
   Name: Lee A Dalzell on Dec 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display):

   Comments (optional; will display): This is a small academic library with a one person technical services dept. There is no budget for training or implementing RDA at all! Next year there will be no budget, and for sure 2012 is worse. This is overpriced and unrealistic. I refuse to use RDA, I may use some provisions (spelling out ill or N.T. for example) but not the rest. When I retire, some other poor librarian can go back and change if they want. Besides, at this time, my ILS probably cannot handle RDA. My comments only, not my university's.

   Flag
5. 305
   Name: Lynn Hammerlund on Dec 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display): Judson University

   Comments (optional; will display): Test RDA--fine. Don't "legitimize" those test records in OCLC, and please don't mess with the authority files! The "training" I've had is all theory, no practice. We're not ready to implement this yet. (My opinion, not reflective of my institution.)

   Flag
6. 306
   Name: James Rentz on Dec 4, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display): Rochester Public Library

   Comments (optional; will display):

   Flag
7. 307
   Name: Kim Robinson on Dec 5, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display):

   Comments (optional; will display):

   Flag
8. 308
   Name: Jamie E. Bourne on Dec 6, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display): Oakton Community College

   Comments (optional; will display):

   Flag
9. 309
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 6, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display):

   Comments (optional; will display):

   Flag
10. 310
    Name: Kitty Kozisek on Dec 6, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Timberland Regional Library

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
11. 311
    Name: Michal Bader on Dec 6, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Cedarville University

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
12. 312
    Name: Felipe Tan on Dec 6, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Andrews University / James White Library

    Comments (optional; will display): While I appreciate the intention to update AACR2R, I see the changes brought up by RDA as overwhelming. If 300+ academic libraries of large institutions of a developed nation like the United States are complaining of the economic and manpower costs of shifting to RDA, what more of the academic libraries overseas which have meager financial and staffing resources. Even here in United States, it is not uncommon for catalogers to have multiple tasks in addition to cataloging. Too radical changes may bring chaos to many institutions all over the world. I hope the current discussion regarding RDA will lead to a win-win solution to everyone and to every institution.

    Flag
13. 313
    Name: Brian Goodykoontz on Dec 7, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
14. 314
    Name: G. S. Petersen on Dec 7, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
15. 315
    Name: Michael Walter on Dec 7, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Indiana University Libraries

    Comments (optional; will display): A limited number of goals pursued by RDA address lacunae in AACR2 which need to be dealt with. However, a great number of changes proposed in RDA are frankly silly and obviously not well thought out. In addition, the method by which this alteration of cataloging practices is being "pushed down" reveals the intellectual and professional insecurity of its creators, who are more interested in making its implementation a fait accompli than they are in overseeing a substantial improvement upon those practices.

    Flag
16. 316
    Name: Jolanta Wojciechowska on Dec 7, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): INB

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
17. 317
    Name: Laila Salibi-Cripe on Dec 7, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Indiana University

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
18. 318
    Name: Ruth Kessler on Dec 7, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): contract cataloguer

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
19. 319
    Name: Hannalie Lourens on Dec 7, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): University of Stellenbosch, South Africa

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
20. 320
    Name: Chiyono Sata on Dec 7, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
21. 321
    Name: Nancy A. Hill on Dec 7, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): University of Texas at El Paso Library

    Comments (optional; will display): My feeling is that RDA threatens to institutionalize sloppy cataloging and undermine authority control, just when 50 years of effort have gotten a lot of people to abide by good standards.

    Flag
22. 322
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 10, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
23. 323
    Name: John Elliott on Dec 17, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Edgewood College

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
24. 324
    Name: Thomas Pirovano on Dec 26, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
25. 325
    Name: Pete Wilson on Dec 30, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Vanderbilt University

    Comments (optional; will display): I also agree with Deborah Tomaras (among others) that RDA testers should accept established NAF headings without change when changing them would be merely a matter of opinion or adding new information not necessary for differentiation. This should continue to be standard policy for authority work even if RDA is adopted.

    Flag
26. 326
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 10, 2011

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
27. 327
    Name: Denise Gavio on Feb 3, 2011

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
28. 328
    Name: Kate Corbett on Jun 3, 2011

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
29. 329
    Name: Xozvknjll on Dec 20, 2011

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): aKbRrrKVnADTstyU

    Comments (optional; will display): oDDL6d ddsncdxwdgmg, nszegjljtnil, zisvyjhngkdm, http://yjwwajrmavbp.com/

    Flag
30. 330
    Name: Microsoft OEM Software on Mar 8, 2012

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): nJgtbuydgrDy

    Comments (optional; will display): KqrYPC I really liked your article post. Great.

    Flag
31. 331
    Name: Cheryl on Mar 13, 2012

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
32. 332
    Name: Cathy Mason on Mar 14, 2012

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Columbus Metropolitan Library (Ohio)

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
33. 333
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 14, 2012

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
34. 334
    Name: Paula Abisognio on Mar 14, 2012

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Library & Archives

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
35. 335
    Name: Uaiegr on May 22, 2012

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): bSGqFmZcWuoJMMqxhB

    Comments (optional; will display): ugUffg tfctfyuxfope, xyhjfoenezxo, qjucpfwuyqsb, http://ughotpzhdcom.com/

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 4, 5, 6, 7