Signatures 336 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 7 › »

1. 51
   Name: Brian Briscoe on Nov 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display):

   Comments (optional; will display):

   Flag
2. 52
   Name: Mike Mitchell on Nov 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display): Brazosport College Library

   Comments (optional; will display):

   Flag
3. 53
   Name: Melissa Cookson on Nov 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display):

   Comments (optional; will display): As others have said, this is my opinion and not necessarily that of my institution as a whole, but I believe that what this petition is asking for is reasonable and something that will benefit libraries that are not RDA testing sites - in the US, this is still the majority, even though many of the libraries themselves may be small. I agree with RDA records being treated as records using a more current set of rules AFTER the testing period (similar to records using AACR vs. AACR2), but during the testing period they should be treated as parallel records.

   Flag
4. 54
   Name: Jo Williams on Nov 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display):

   Comments (optional; will display): My support only; not necessarily the position of my employer.

   Flag
5. 55
   Name: Barbara Stewart on Nov 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display): UMass Amherst

   Comments (optional; will display):

   Flag
6. 56
   Name: Robert Freel on Nov 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display):

   Comments (optional; will display): RDA is not needed and will create more problems than it solves. Writers should go back to the drawing board and start over again.

   Flag
7. 57
   Name: Jackie Schumaker on Nov 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display): Northeastern State University, Tahlequah, OK

   Comments (optional; will display):

   Flag
8. 58
   Name: James Weinheimer on Nov 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display): The American University of Rome

   Comments (optional; will display): See also: The Cooperative Cataloging Rules at http://sites.google.com/site/opencatalogingrules/

   Flag
9. 59
   Name: Karen Rattunde on Nov 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display): University of Wisconsin-Madison

   Comments (optional; will display): The name of the petition is a bit misleading. I don't have a problem with testing RDA-- just with OCLC treating the test records (and by extension RDA) as a done deal.

   Flag
10. 60
    Name: Laura Wilson on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Oregon State University

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
11. 61
    Name: George E Mattis on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
12. 62
    Name: Anna Lois Kroll on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): The Master's Seminary Library

    Comments (optional; will display): Yes, please take into consideration ALL libraries, large and small, that are affected by the methods used during the RDA testing period.

    Flag
13. 63
    Name: Helen M. Buhler on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
14. 64
    Name: Nancy Adams on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Palmer Theological Seminary

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
15. 65
    Name: Tim Markus on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): The Evergreen State College Library

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
16. 66
    Name: Ruth A. Light on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
17. 67
    Name: Suzanne Mudge on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Indiana University

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
18. 68
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): New York Public Library

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
19. 69
    Name: Amy Ranger on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display): RDA is unwieldy at best, untenable at worst, and is being implemented at a time when resources (human & financial) are greatly restrained. Please, let's not waste any more time or energy on this.

    Flag
20. 70
    Name: Patricia Bennett on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Everett Public Library

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
21. 71
    Name: Patricia Burson on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Santa Monica College

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
22. 72
    Name: Denise Gavio on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): American Academy in Rome

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
23. 73
    Name: John Whisler on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Eastern Illinois University

    Comments (optional; will display): It seems particularly important to me that there be only ONE valid authority at a time.

    Flag
24. 74
    Name: Martha Gunnarson on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
25. 75
    Name: Michelle Prall on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Rehoboth Beach Public Library

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
26. 76
    Name: Patt Leonard on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
27. 77
    Name: Kathy Eger on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Sussex County Dept of Libraries

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
28. 78
    Name: Chris Long on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Indiana University School of Law-Indianapolis

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
29. 79
    Name: Julie Swierczek on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): McKillop Library, Salve Regina University

    Comments (optional; will display): During the testing period, RDA records should be treated as parallel records. Only after the official adoption date should restrictions be in place on creating records in both AACR2 and RDA.

    Flag
30. 80
    Name: Joy Banks on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Florida Southern College

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
31. 81
    Name: R. Conrad Winke on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Columbia College Chicago

    Comments (optional; will display): Abandon RDA entirely and start again!

    Flag
32. 82
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): University of Wisconsin Law Library

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
33. 83
    Name: Paula Perry on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
34. 84
    Name: J. McRee (Mac) Elrod on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Special Libraries Cataloguing, Inc.

    Comments (optional; will display): Coding RDA test records as less than full according to current rules and standards in a good idea, particularly since there is no MARC fixed field code for rda.

    Flag
35. 85
    Name: Tracey Stivers on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Cincinnati State Technical & Community College

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
36. 86
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Harrisburg Area Community College

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
37. 87
    Name: April Davies on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): SUNY Cobleskill

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
38. 88
    Name: James Larrabee on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): UC Berkeley Law Library

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
39. 89
    Name: Linda Umoh on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Bridwell Library, Southern Methodist University

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
40. 90
    Name: Mechael D. Charbonneau on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Indiana University, Bloomington

    Comments (optional; will display): For those of us who are not participating in the testing of RDA, probably the vast majority of catalogers using OCLC, adoption of the proposed changes outlined in this petition would provide: (1.) a controlled, positive RDA learning environment for AACR2 catalogers watching from the sidelines; and: (2.) not impact or interfere with current cataloging operations.

    Flag
41. 91
    Name: Roz Ewalt on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Dallas County Community College District

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
42. 92
    Name: Lynn Fahy on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
43. 93
    Name: Anita Lauer on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
44. 94
    Name: Evelyn Pypes on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Kansas City Public Library

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
45. 95
    Name: Claudia Diaz on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Albion College

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
46. 96
    Name: Maria Olga Camarillo on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
47. 97
    Name: Mei Hu on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Tennessee Tech University

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
48. 98
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display): Cannot afford it at this time. MARC appears to supply our needs.

    Flag
49. 99
    Name: Harriett Ranney on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display): Personal opinion--not necessarily an institutional opinion.

    Flag
50. 100
    Name: Khurshid on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 7 › »