Signatures 336 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 7 › »

1. 1
   Name: Jacqueline Byrd on Nov 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display): Indiana University Libraries, Bloomington

   Comments (optional; will display):

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Jeffrey Morgan on Nov 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display): University of West Vieginia

   Comments (optional; will display):

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Susan Grant on Nov 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display):

   Comments (optional; will display):

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Claudia Kramer Bissett on Nov 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display): Saint Anselm College

   Comments (optional; will display): This should also apply to any of RDA records created by non-testers in the OCLC database.

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Michael Monaco on Nov 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display): Cleveland Public Library

   Comments (optional; will display):

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Aaron K. Smith on Nov 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display): Allen County Public Library, Fort Wayne

   Comments (optional; will display):

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Jane Tupin on Nov 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display):

   Comments (optional; will display):

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display): SUNY IT

   Comments (optional; will display):

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Deborah Tomaras on Nov 3, 2010

   Institution/Library (optional; will display): New York Public Library

   Comments (optional; will display): I believe that RDA testers should always use an existing authority record unless it is blatantly unusable by RDA rules--and this does NOT include "oh I just want to add the dates or fuller forms because they are now known". If there are no conflicts and the heading is compatible, please respect the integrity of the authority file, and its vital importance for patron recall.

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: John DeSantis on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Dartmouth College

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Jill G. Thomas on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Lawrence University

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Jack Wu on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Franciscan University of Steubenville

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Lauren Noel on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Columbia College Library

    Comments (optional; will display): To quote Deborah Tomares, NACO Coordinator at NYP: If we undermine authority control, as is being done in this RDA test, we are compromising one of cataloging's great strengths, what we point to when asserting that library catalogs are "better than Google" for searching and retrieval. It would seem to me more prudent to always use existing authority headings if they are found (adding the 70014 for RDA in the authority record for future potential usage), and only use RDA headings in bibliographic records (and create them in the authority file) if there are none already existent.

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Claudette Burke on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): National Baseball Hall of Fame

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Frank Newton on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Marijah Sroczynski on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Elaine Sanchez on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Texas State University-San Marcos

    Comments (optional; will display): My opinion only, not that of my institution. These are practical changes which should help all non-RDA participants to continue their usual cataloging and authority workflows, which involve OCLC WorldCat records, without further disruption. The needs of the many should be upheld over the desires of the few but powerful. They are small changes which can be made at this point, as the test is only 1/3 into its full 3 month period.

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Wojciech Siemaszkiewicz on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): New York Public Library

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Pamela Kirsch on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display): I strongly endorse the statement against RDA testers creating conflicting NAF and SAF records in LC.

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Albert M. Bryson on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Lincoln University (PA) Langston Hughes Memorial Library

    Comments (optional; will display): I think the idea proposed by this petition worthy merit.

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Martha Rice Sandersq on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): HELIN Consortium

    Comments (optional; will display): My opinion only and not representative of any HELIN member library or the organization in general. As authority control coordinator for our consortial catalog, having conflicting authority records in our authorities database will trigger global changes which will need to be blocked or redone if RDA does not become the 'law of the land.'

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: MOHAMED EL FADIL on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): AL AKHAWAYN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Jo A Daniels on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): McFarlin Library / University of Tulsa

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Sue Stancu on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Cook Music Library, Indiana University

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: David Anderson on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Nancy Cowden on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Okla City Univ Law Library

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Janet E. Scott on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): William & Gayle Cook Music Library

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Charles Peters on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): IU William & Gayle Cook Music Library

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Bart Burk on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): University of Notre Dame

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Rachel Wheeler on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Indiana University Wells Library

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: S. Wire on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Mary Ann Buhler on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Manhattan Christian College

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Candice Feldt on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Michelle Hahn on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Southern Methodist University

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Stephen T. Early on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Center for Research Libraries

    Comments (optional; will display): While I had a positive experience attending a recent training session at an RDA testing institution, the intended "permanence" of these test records still concerns me. Acceptance or rejection of RDA after testing and evaluation should be as objective as possible. I believe a parallel record approach, if implementable, would remove any perception that RDA is a "done deal."

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Susan Gallagher on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Brookens LIbrary, University of Illinois Springfield

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Robert Kusmer on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Shanna Decker on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Boise Public Library

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Jacqueline Brown on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Connie Strait on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Sylvia Turchyn on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Indiana University, Bloomington

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Laura S. Clover on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display): Personal opinion

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Kathleen F. Lamantia on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Stark County District Library

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Richard Watts on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Roger M. Miller on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Public Library of Cincinnati and Hamilton County

    Comments (optional; will display): Just speaking for myself ... this is not an official opinion of my institution.

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Joni L. Cassidy on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Cassidy Cataloguing Services

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Carolyn Phillips on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Theresa Connors on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display):

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Patricia Hewitt on Nov 3, 2010

    Institution/Library (optional; will display): Fray Angelico Chavez History Library

    Comments (optional; will display):

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 7 › »