Memorandum Against RDA Test
We instruct the OCLC to do the following: Immediately suspend coding the test RDA records as acceptable records and recode them as substandard records with a code “RDA” (no PCC, LC, etc. coding should be allowed on these records). The encoding level for these records should be “K”, which usually triggers a full review of the record by highly trained technical assistants or professional catalogers. The LC records should be coded as level “7”.
The RDA test records should be treated the same way as records coded with Spanish, French, German, etc. codes. This would allow catalogers to create parallel records for 040 English records according to existing and widely accepted AACR2 rules.
Under no circumstances should RDA testers be allowed to create conflicting NAF or SAF records in LCNAF or LCSAF. This has already created a great deal of confusion and has been universally rejected by catalogers involved in the discussion.
We instruct agencies responsible for the RDA test to instruct its testers to follow above mentioned rules as a way to avoid workflow complications and growing confusion in libraries around the world.
We understand that the implementation of the RDA test is not necessarily indicative of any future implementation of new cataloging procedures and rules that might replace the current AACR2 rules. We believe consideration should be given to the difficulties thus far encountered when plans are made for any eventual implementation of RDA.
No comments yet.join the discussion
social bookmarking service, Russian Federation2 years ago Institution/Library (optional; will display): xgiSAaTyCmQoCmcKNyt
Comments (optional; will display): Qthi9O I cannot thank you enough for the article. Awesome.
uaiegr, United Kingdom3 years ago Institution/Library (optional; will display): bSGqFmZcWuoJMMqxhB
Comments (optional; will display): ugUffg tfctfyuxfope, xyhjfoenezxo, qjucpfwuyqsb, http://ughotpzhdcom.com/
Paula Abisognio, United States3 years ago Institution/Library (optional; will display): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Library & Archives
Comments (optional; will display): -
There are no highlights yet.