No Rail On Richmond

Signatures 107 total

Page: 1, 2, 3

1. 1
   Name: Daphne Scarbrough on Jul 28, 2006

   Comments: We did not vote on it and Metro should not take our trees, our land and our homes and businesses without a vote.

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: T.R. Mackin on Jul 29, 2006

   Comments: I do NOT want the rail on Richmond Ave.

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: R. Michelle Anderson on Jul 30, 2006

   Comments: Increased utilization of mass transit could be accomplished by allowing people to ride METRO buses at no charge....they are empty the majority of the time. We do not need a rail system -- it is a costly duplication of infrastructure that is not used. Nor do trees, neighborhoods and businesses need to be destroyed to get people into the Galleria area to shop.

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Richard Whiteley on Jul 31, 2006

   Comments: I live at 4606 Staunton and am against light rail on Richmond Avenue. METRO needs to honor the voters decision in 2003 and take Richmond off the table.

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2006

   Comments: I live at 4606 Staunton and am against light rail on Richmond Avenue. METRO needs to honor the voters decision in 2003 and take Richmond off the table.

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Bartley Pickron on Jul 31, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Talley Gregg on Jul 31, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Charles T. Harris on Jul 31, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Waverly Evans on Jul 31, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Marjorie Chadwick on Jul 31, 2006

    Comments: I question the central premise for Metro's rail on Richmond proposal. Because of their equivocation, I do not believe their research figures on ridership or any of their statements regarding the collateral damage their rail, which is really not a mass transit solution at all, will cause.

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2006

    Comments: This will ruin the quality of life for me and my family. We would live less than 2 blocks from this train. I do not want this in my neighborhood and I will never use it.

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Gymme Miele on Jul 31, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Luz E. Montoya-Nino on Jul 31, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Luz E. Montoya-Nino on Jul 31, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: JeanneHubbard on Aug 1, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Viking Dietrich on Aug 1, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Roger Deeds on Aug 1, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Gayla Hamilton on Aug 2, 2006

    Comments: I am adamantly opposed to Rail on Richmond because our mobility within the 610 Loop would be greatly diminished instead of increased. Rail should be to the outer lying areas to keep cars from coming into the city of Houston and where adequate parking to board a train could be provided.

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Peter Popkin on Aug 3, 2006

    Comments: I never voted on the Richmond proposal that Metro is "cramming down our throats." I voted on the Westpark alignment clearly stated on the ballot.

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Gilda B. Bayegan on Aug 3, 2006

    Comments: THERE IS A BETTER WAY!

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Susan Walker on Aug 3, 2006

    Comments: Take the rail to westpark as was voted on

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Mike Staley on Aug 3, 2006

    Comments: NO rail on Richmond. The streets will be to narrow and traffic problems will exist Put the rail where it was supposed to go on Westpark.

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Rail On Richmond on Aug 3, 2006

    Comments: you guys are dumbasses...use logic.

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Mary Hill on Aug 3, 2006

    Comments: NO, to rail on Richmond!!!

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Randi Zubowski on Aug 4, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Roy R. Reynolds on Aug 4, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Wyn Bomar on Aug 4, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: William J. Pray on Aug 5, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Kevin Gilliard on Aug 5, 2006

    Comments: I am completely against rail on Richmond!

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Neal Meyer on Aug 5, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Linda Suib on Aug 6, 2006

    Comments: Please do not put the rail on Richmond. We want it on Westpark as we voted in 2003.

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Tom on Aug 7, 2006

    Comments: YES to rail on Richmond and YES to multiple entries on your pathetic petition! 14 Luz E. Montoya-Nino 15 Luz E. Montoya-Nino

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Michelle Beale on Aug 7, 2006

    Comments: i voted for Rail on Wedstpark-not Richmond

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Nicolette Voit on Aug 7, 2006

    Comments: This was decided by vote and it was abundantly clear that Westpark was the voters selection. Why is that now being ignored Do any politicians keep their word Has Metro become a monopoly that controls us I VOTE NO ON THE RAIL.ON RICHMOND, ONE MORE TIME.

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 26, 2006

    Comments: lameass excuse for no rail on richmond

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: David Corban on Aug 26, 2006

    Comments: As a homeowner within four blocks of Richmond, I oppose Metro's unwarranted intrusion into my neighborhood.

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 28, 2006

    Comments: Metro shoul honor the route that was approved - WESTPARK!

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Carol Ayres on Aug 30, 2006

    Comments: Westpark is appropriate for a rail system. It is NOT a residential street, as much of Richmond Avenue is. Richmond Avenue would be totally ruined by putting a rail down the middle of the street. As a homeowner who lives on Richmond Avenue, count me as VASTLY opposed to rail on Richmond.

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: AftonAg on Aug 31, 2006

    Comments: I say no rail on Richmond because I am a old stuborn fart. Who is opposed to it because every one else is.

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Karl Muench on Sep 12, 2006

    Comments: The debate should not be where do we put the rail to accomadate growth, but should we limit growth and not have rail at all.

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Anthony Margiotta on Oct 10, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Ralph Wilkins on Oct 11, 2006

    Comments: I oppose this re-thinking of the Richmond rail. The light rail has proven to be a poor decision, and expansion is an even poorer one.

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Matt Howell on Oct 21, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Tom English on Oct 24, 2006

    Comments: I have ridden the Metro Rail on Main a total of one time. It took forever. It was slower than taking a car. I would hate to see Richmond Street torn up as it will cost a lot of money and take a long time. If the powers that be feel that Richmond needs more public transportation another bus could be added and stops could be reduced to speed bus times. How about using one of those accordian buses if the ones are full now. Rail on Richmond is a terrible idea!

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Douche Bag McSelfish on Nov 7, 2006

    Comments: yall are idiots

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Wes Mikulich on Nov 10, 2006

    Comments: It would be a crime to destroy the Richmond greenspace. Put rail on westHEIMER where it will do the most good!

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Mark Ulrich on Dec 14, 2006

    Comments: I am vigorously opposed to light rail on Richmond. Thanks for the website and keeping us informed!

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Donna Kay Smith on Dec 29, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Jack Myhogoff on Feb 1, 2007

    Comments: The rail will bring dark people to our neck of the woods. I ain't likin' that.

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3