Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 60 total

Page: 1, 2

  1. 1
    Name: James Mason on Aug 4, 2007
    Comments: Nottingham Council should forget this. We pay enough to drive and park already. Leave workers and companies alone.
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: T Wright on Aug 4, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 4, 2007
    Comments: A step too far.
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Roger Lawson on Aug 4, 2007
    Comments: As someone who was born and brought up in Nottingham, I thought the citizens of this city would have more sense than to support the daft idea of taxing parked cars.
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Steve Manning on Aug 6, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Alan Knowler on Aug 6, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Jenny Sleep on Aug 7, 2007
    Comments: There are a number of family members, at least 14, who live in Nottingham therefore we often visit and we abhor this unnecessary cost which is simply to comply with an EU road tax diktat.
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Glenn Comiskey on Aug 7, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Barry Lovell on Aug 7, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 7, 2007
    Comments: Let the councillors lead the way by surrendering in their driving licences and walk, cycle or use public transport (no TAXI's) So come on then ,who is going to take up the offer/
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: J.M.Broad on Aug 8, 2007
    Comments: An additional tax on any person visiting Nottingham for business reasons can do nothing but affect my decision as to whther it's wirth coming to Nottingham at all. J.M.Broad
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Ian Taylor on Aug 8, 2007
    Comments: Charging just for driving to work in any particular place is iniquitous. It won't do anything about congestion without driving business and visitors away completely - it will make like horrendously difficult and expensive for those who support the city with their labour.
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Christopher Gould on Aug 8, 2007
    Comments: Motorists have paid many times over for use of the roads, which includes parking places. Not providing them is dishonest, trying to get more money for the little we have is just robbery.
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Ian Tapp on Aug 9, 2007
    Comments: All of these costs to businesses get passed on to consumers. That is why London is so tremendously expensive. It should be remembered that government and councils are forcing prices up with these measures.
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Brian Fitzell on Aug 11, 2007
    Comments: I only time before other grasping Local Authorities try this on elsewhere.
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Joe Round on Aug 13, 2007
    Comments: What is next after this then a foot-tax to repair footways and to reduce pedestrian congestion on weekends. They already get enough money, if the politicians need to raise taxes they should have the guts to do so not just to bring in more taxes as this may loose them less votes.
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Martin Breakwell on Aug 13, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Trevor Hartley on Sep 13, 2007
    Comments: I work for Boots at the head office site in beeston working shifts, i travel 16.8 miles to and from work and would like to know what realistic alternatives Nottingham City Council can offer me As I cannot use the bus, tram or train and would be unable to walk or cycle to work as i start my shifts at 6:00am mornings and 13:25pm afternoons
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 26, 2007
    Comments: Let the councillors lead by example, no free parking for them. If they can not do their duties by public transport, cycling or walking, sack them! Because that is what they are saying to their own ratepayers.
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: H Heeley on May 13, 2008
    Comments: The work place parking levy is an unfair and ill thought out tax on workers in Nottingham - at least with Congestion Charge people would have a choice.
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Katie Headland on May 14, 2008
    Comments: I've tried using public transport and it took me an 1 1/2 hours each way. With the rising cost of fuel working in Nottingham is already becoming increasingly expensive without htis additional cost.
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Rob Spencer on May 14, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Simon Goddard on May 14, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Rachel Serio on May 14, 2008
    Comments: I work in NG1 and due to time restraints with childcare I cannot use the park and ride. Additionally I need my car during the course of my working day. Currently fuel alone costs me over
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Anonymous on May 14, 2008
    Comments: The trams won't go near my house so I won't be able to use them so why should I fund them It's just another "easy" tax from motorists who already pay enough on fuel, road tax etc.
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Anonymous on May 14, 2008
    Comments: Businesess and individuals are already taxed enough and there is no doubt that the parling tax will in some way be passed onto the individual. Why bring somehting like this in at a time when everyone within Nottingham needs to be attracting new businesess to the region to replace lost jobs at places like Boots Cap one and Experian. It is a very odd decision. The City does not suffer as badly as other Cities I have worked ot lived in and they are not talking about implemeting a system. Perhaps if the peole that be put their time into ways to improve public transport as in appealing ways rather
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: SUSAN SILLS on May 14, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: MICHELLE HALLAM on May 14, 2008
    Comments: I work in the centre of Nottingham and it costs me enough tin petrol to commute to work without added fees on top.
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Emma Johnson on May 14, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Anonymous on May 14, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Anonymous on May 14, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Kay Heeley on May 15, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Anonymous on May 23, 2008
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Peter Bennetts on Jun 26, 2008
    Comments: Hopefully this will turn Nottingham into a ghost town
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Richhard Jenkings on Jul 2, 2008
    Comments: This is an unfair tax where people who do not use, and have not access to the Tram. (Because it goes no where near my home or my place of work). Have to pay to subsidise a private company. It will make Nottingam a place where no business wants to be located, because it costs more.
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Philip Sadler on Jul 14, 2008
    Comments: i work on boots beeston site i don!t want an extra expense off parking just to go to work i need my car to get to work as there is no local transport to get me there on nights
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Philip Sadler on Jul 14, 2008
    Comments: i work on boots beeston site i don!t want an extra expense off parking just to go to work i need my car to get to work as there is no local transport to get me there on nights
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Jason Willetts on Sep 22, 2008
    Comments: This levy is just another extreme, punitive and unjustifed form of taxation
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Shane Martin on Oct 1, 2008
    Comments: I think this is a really unfair tax to add onto working people. This seems to be another incentive to not work and let all of those who do pay for my benefits etc. Totally unfair, annoying and certainly not a good time due to the current economic situation which means that many of us who are trying our best to earn a living are being penalised at every available opportunity!
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Keith on Feb 16, 2009
    Comments: Dear Council. You Know where you can shove your new anti car Tax. If not I can shove it up there for you. Thanks
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Robert Blake on Aug 27, 2009
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Lucka on Aug 16, 2011
    Comments: Woah nelly, how about them apepls!
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Rybvkiwk on Aug 16, 2011
    Comments: odEnyB <a href="http://ykoihcrzbrxo.com/">ykoihcrzbrxo</a>
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Msllicluud on Aug 16, 2011
    Comments: 2OZZox , [url=http://nzzzwfzpeoaq.com/]nzzzwfzpeoaq[/url], [link=http://jrxhzfinzcly.com/]jrxhzfinzcly[/link], http://ciidczpwmlpz.com/
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Namari on Aug 16, 2011
    Comments: A few years ago I'd have to pay smoonee for this information.
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Nelia on Aug 17, 2011
    Comments: All of these articles have saved me a lot of haeacdehs.
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Nelia on Aug 17, 2011
    Comments: All of these articles have saved me a lot of haeacdehs.
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Jake on Jun 4, 2012
    Comments: In researching the lyiang of the brick streets I saw alot of work and time spent in researching all the options available at that time. Even though the bricks were one of the most expensive options, the durability of them won the city over. They knew in the long run the cost to maintain them would be far less then the other options. Let's give our city fathers of North Platte some credit. They made a good choice and they made it for all the right reasons. They were a generation of men who fought in the Civil War and came west to start new lives and worked hard to do it. They took hugh value and pride in their work and made a lasting legacy for their families and future generations. Lets save our brick streets and so we can have something to pass on to our future generations.
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Brenda on Jun 4, 2012
    Comments: I am in favor of keeping the dwontown bricks, keep researching to find the best way to do this. One of the saddest days for dwontown was the demolition of the UP Depot.I am lucky enough to have a few pieces. I agree whole heartedly with Jacque Kennedy when she fought so hard and it was passed to not take any of the New York City buildings down but to repair and reface them.
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Jycmqn on Jun 4, 2012
    Comments: 5uxUcs uoxdoygewsix
    Flag

Page: 1, 2

Sponsored links