Signatures 1998 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 40 › »
-
101
Name: Chris Parks on Jun 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
102
Name: P. Howard on Jun 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
103
Name: N Blankley on Jun 26, 2009Comments: Even 2300hrs to 0700hrs can be intrusive, 2200hrs to 0800hrs would be far more acceptable.Flag
-
104
Name: R Clay on Jun 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
105
Name: Stephen Davies on Jun 26, 2009Comments: Resident of Vale Square for thirty years, and therefore aware that the nuisance by day and night which by this airport causes to an unoffending seaside town has increased enormously. We should be allowed to sleep in peace.Flag
-
106
Name: Pat Scutt on Jun 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
107
Name: Anonymous on Jun 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
108
Name: Anonymous on Jun 26, 2009Comments: As a resident in Broadstairs our household can clearly hear aircraft taking off. The noise late evening is even more apparent. Flights during the night would be ridiculous.Flag
-
109
Name: Anonymous on Jun 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
110
Name: Barry Hardy. Please Ph. 01843 845022 on Jun 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
111
Name: L.Loyd on Jun 26, 2009Comments: happy to see the progress of the air port but as I work full time and start at 7 most days, I would prefer to have a good nights sleep.Flag
-
112
Name: Susan Kennedy on Jun 26, 2009Comments: As a resident of Ramsgate and as someone concerned with the wider issues of climate change, I am totally opposed to the expansion of Manston. As part of my overall concerns, I am naturally opposed to ay night flights into or out of Manston.Flag
-
113
Name: Anonymous on Jun 26, 2009Comments: want the airport to succeed but not at the expense of quality of life i.e. sleepless nightsFlag
-
114
Name: Ann Moss on Jun 27, 2009Comments:Flag
-
115
Name: Anonymous on Jun 27, 2009Comments: We do not want any night flights ,I think 11 pm is still late if people have small children the last thing you want is them waking up at that time of night and not being able to get them back to sleep.Flag
-
116
Name: Anonymous on Jun 27, 2009Comments:Flag
-
117
Name: James Smith on Jun 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
118
Name: Anonymous on Jun 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
119
Name: Anonymous on Jun 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
120
Name: Anonymous on Jun 28, 2009Comments: I have just experienced a day-time flight directly over my house - I cannot imagine any night-time flights. The noise was appallingFlag
-
121
Name: M Stace on Jun 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
122
Name: Dave Ford on Jun 29, 2009Comments: no more traing flights ruins sundaysFlag
-
123
Name: Keith on Jun 29, 2009Comments: Only a selfish fool not living in the area could propose such an anti-social thing.Flag
-
124
Name: Cris Ford on Jun 30, 2009Comments:Flag
-
125
Name: Anonymous on Jun 30, 2009Comments:Flag
-
126
Name: Bella Goyarts on Jun 30, 2009Comments:Flag
-
127
Name: C.Lowe on Jun 30, 2009Comments: As 8 hours of undisturbed sleep are needed for health, the night period should be at least 10 pm to 8 am, to allow for the rare late/early plane, and for children. There are many reasons for banning night flights, and restraining aviation, for example: SASIG has shown that there is no economic benefit from night flights. There are huge adverse health impacts from loss of sleep. Night flights have double the effect of day flights on global warming and and flying is three times as bad as surface transport for climate change. Aviation expansion damages the UK economy because of the tax subsidy of £50,000 per job and the tourism deficit of £17bn.Flag
-
128
Name: MrMrs Brookes on Jun 30, 2009Comments: Not only night flights are serious to our quality of life but what about how low the planes fly during the day and query the flight paths because studd hill, tankerton, whitstable are being constantly flown over at very low height. Why cant they come in from the sea - manston in thanet so keep the planes over thanet. We were not consulted on the flight paths and have been told they are supposed to fly over the sea to hampton pier then turn in but they are not.Flag
-
129
Name: Raymond May on Jun 30, 2009Comments: As a resident of St Nicholas-at-Wade I fully endorse the above commentsFlag
-
130
Name: Michael Child on Jul 1, 2009Comments: I am certainly against night flights and have considerable concerns about the environmental safeguards at Manston, especially operating with no fuel interceptor on the main runway. I am told that in the event of a crash involving a fuel spillage on the main runway the contingency plan is to turn off the valves to the drains and contain the fuel on the runway.Flag
-
131
Name: C.V. MaCaul on Jul 2, 2009Comments: I can appreciate the noise and disruption low flying night flights can causeFlag
-
132
Name: Anonymous on Jul 2, 2009Comments:Flag
-
133
Name: Anonymous on Jul 6, 2009Comments: I have recently complained twice to KIA regarding 2 flights operating outside the Variation to S106 Agreement hours. The first was a flight on Sunday 3rd May at 0504 hrs and the second was on Sunday 21st June at 2340 hrs. Both of these flights took off in the direction of and over Acol village. Generally, flights taking off over Acol fly a loop over the village before heading off to their destination. This is horrendously noisy, particulary at 5 in the morning. The replies I received from both Infratil and TDC were typical, ie we are allowed to do this because these were not scheduled flights! To my way of thinking this gives KIA carte blanche to operate anything at any time of day or night and to hell with the consequences and people it disturbs. I am totally sick and fed up with this airport.Flag
-
134
Name: Andrea Slaughter on Jul 7, 2009Comments:Flag
-
135
Name: J Anderson on Jul 7, 2009Comments: Living right on the flight path I do not want night flights. I would not object to a few more day flights.Flag
-
136
Name: Mark Fletcher on Jul 16, 2009Comments:Flag
-
137
Name: Janet Mcbride. on Jul 17, 2009Comments: The noise from the planes during the day is bad enough - there should be no night flights at all.Flag
-
138
Name: Mrs Higgins on Jul 22, 2009Comments:Flag
-
139
Name: Thomas Manning on Jul 22, 2009Comments:Flag
-
140
Name: Frank Batt on Jul 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
141
Name: Sarah Batt on Jul 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
142
Name: Kim Edgington on Jul 26, 2009Comments:Flag
-
143
Name: Lance Bird on Jul 26, 2009Comments: Enough already!Flag
-
144
Name: Sarah Wise on Jul 27, 2009Comments: People should be entitled to peace and quiet. Please have some respect for others rather than opting for financial gain!Flag
-
145
Name: Kelly Blaney on Jul 27, 2009Comments:Flag
-
146
Name: Sarah Wallace on Aug 5, 2009Comments:Flag
-
147
Name: Anonymous on Aug 11, 2009Comments: I agree that the long term future for Ramsgate lies in tourism which would be ruined by an increase in both day and night flights.I cannot believe that everybody cannot see the sense in this and well done to your website to keep the matter a more democratic one.Who are the fools that run ThanetFlag
-
148
Name: Andy Read on Aug 24, 2009Comments: i object to any night flights, i object to any further development of the airport as a cargo terminal. Both of these will in no way help to develop Thanet but will in fact have a negative affect on investment. The local and county council should in fact be helping push the benefits of local businesses such as Thanet Earth who offer a much more healthy, locally productive proposition than an airport flying in cheap african food on decrepid aircraft potentialy all night and day.Flag
-
149
Name: Anonymous on Aug 25, 2009Comments:Flag
-
150
Name: Anthony Statham on Aug 27, 2009Comments:Flag