Signatures 1935 total
-
1
Name: Phil Rose on Jun 10, 2009Comments: This petition will be presented to: Thanet District Council (the planning authority with responsibility for Manston); KIACC (the consultative body that represents all those with an interest in Manston a.k.a. Kent International Airport); and Infratil (the owners of KIA).Flag
- 2
- 3
- 4
-
5
Name: Neil Morgan on Jun 12, 2009Comments: i agree this will cause a lot disruption to local people like myself and my family. i have two girls one 3yrs and one 2 weeks oldFlag
- 6
-
7
Name: Wayne Sheppard on Jun 12, 2009Comments: I live under the flight line and I DO NOT Support any plans to expand Manston!Flag
- 8
-
9
Name: Anonymous on Jun 12, 2009Comments: I am very glad that someone else can see that the late night flying is not on .All of Ramsgate is affected already ,dirty fumes etc coming from the planes as they land,and the planes that are supposed to be quiet and are not.I have contacted the airport several times regarding planes arriving in the middle of the night .Sometimes they send you a form asking daft questions like ,what colour was the plane ,how many engines did it have.Quite good seening its dark or that you were asleep until the plane woke you up.Even if you filled in the form they never sent a reply,I think they think that if they ignore you,then you will give up .Then they can say no one is complainingFlag
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
-
22
Name: Margot Bandola on Jun 14, 2009Comments: Also can they use runways that stop flights over Ramsgate altogetherFlag
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
-
32
Name: Sandy Winkworth on Jun 16, 2009Comments: This is the biggest unadvertised disaster that could possibly happen to the area, and no one has let on. So we must do all that we can to avert this thing from happening.Flag
- 33
- 34
- 35
-
36
Name: Colin Ryan on Jun 18, 2009Comments: How can Infratil justify any demand for night flights when they do not have more than half a dozen flights a week in normal working hours. They must be taking us and Thanet district council for fools.Flag
-
37
Name: Alan Moss on Jun 18, 2009Comments: In Upstreet we already suffer from excessive noise from Manston flights, particularly training flights practising take-offs and landings which produce low flying and extreme noise every 10 minutes at times. There should be no relaxation of the ban on flights between 11pm and 7am which I suspect is being flouted at the moment anyway.Flag
- 38
-
39
Name: Leonora Shapland on Jun 18, 2009Comments: Peace and tranquillity for Thanet ... no night flights!Flag
-
40
Name: Steve Higgins on Jun 19, 2009Comments: too close to Ramsgate, too far from catchment areas make it a bad ideaFlag
- 41
- 42
-
43
Name: Anonymous on Jun 19, 2009Comments: We are situated beneath the flight path at Ramsgate and when certain aircraft pass overhead, the noise is deafening. To have night flights would certainly keep us awake although the house is well insulated it does not make much difference to the sound of these very noisy aircraft.Flag
-
44
Name: Ken Hando on Jun 19, 2009Comments: I recently used Manston. My flight was delayed 2 hours& landed at 11.30.pm.In my view they should have made more effort to get there by 11.00pm.Flag
- 45
-
46
Name: Doreen Bailey on Jun 19, 2009Comments: Good luck with the petition, living in Minster would be intolerable with night flights.Flag
-
47
Name: Anonymous on Jun 19, 2009Comments: Why are you people always against any development at Manston. Do you really believe that there would be 103,800 flights a year! Perhaps you should get back to the real world and consider the reality of the position of the airport compared to Gatwick, Heathrow or Stanstead which are not stuck out on a limb like Manston. If you are so against any development at Manston which as you know has been there for many years, you should have given this consideration before moving into the area knowing that the airport was there. Surely one must realise that airports generate aircraft (after all thats what they are there for). I would be pleased to see this published for people to read and maybe generate some common sense in this matter.Flag
- 48
- 49
- 50