 |
| # | Country | Comments |
|---|
| 1 | UK | |
| 2 | UK | |
| 3 | UK | |
| 4 | UK | |
| 5 | UK | |
| 6 | UK | |
| 7 | UK | |
| 8 | UK | The UK should be a WMD free zone, as should our entire planet. |
| 9 | UK | |
| 10 | UK | I don't want to pay for any further nuclear weapons, I fail to see why we have any at all. |
| 11 | UK | |
| 12 | PT | |
| 13 | UK | |
| 14 | UK | Workers of all countries, Unite! |
| 15 | UK | |
| 16 | UK | You know it makes sense! |
| 17 | UK | How can we, in all seriousness, demand that any other nation in the world "renounces nuclear weapons" when we are actively working on new ones ourselves, as are the USA. We cannot live in a world where it is one rule for ourselves and one rule for other nations that we just don't like very much! Enough hypocrisy! |
| 18 | UK | |
| 19 | UK | |
| 20 | UK | |
| 21 | US | Maury Reishtein said
that the probability
that the world has not
blown up is so low..
God must be running
the show |
| 22 | UK | The UK should be setting the right example to the so called 'rogue states' - not giving them the excuse to develop their own WMDs. |
| 23 | UK | |
| 24 | UK | |
| 25 | UK | I am a 16 year old girl, who knows nothing of politics but I feel its an absloute travesty to have the U.K trident weapons system; a complete waste of resources and a danger to any country and the surrounding area. This is a very powerful weapon and under no circumstances can it be used. |
| 26 | UK | stop the hypocrisy and throw out your wmd's !!!!Your people don't want them!!!!!! |
| 27 | UK | |
| 28 | UK | Http://hometown.aol.co.uk/orillasound/cyberactive.html |
| 29 | UK | To even contemplate their use, never mind threaten , is an offence to all of humanity. |
| 30 | UK | Bush and Blair the evil pair |
| 31 | | |
| 32 | UK | |
| 33 | | |
| 34 | UK | |
| 35 | US | Dear No New Nukes:
I have been stalked by a privacy invasion cult for as long as I can remember with attempted murder on my life to destroy me and the life that I support to have had with my father. http://www.cotse.net/privacy/law/states/mississippi.htm and http://www.stalkingvictims.com/ and http://www.ncvc.org/ncvc/main.aspx?dbID=dash_Home
I am on disability as a result of this interference with my family and Job. They have put my life in danger many times because of the dangerous hypnosis because I worked in a very high place. With the Freedom of information act I have reacquired the Governments program about Mind Control. The U.S. department of Labor statistics at http://www.bls.gov/iif/home.htm Shows the death rate of fatalities by detailed industry like in was 1992 there were 6217deaths. These terrorists are using the electrical lines, satellites and other methods of invading my privacy. They're responsible for the short coming in my job by using mind control tactics to place me into a state of hypnosis. The interrogation that these terrorists are doing now is a threat to mankind by threatening missiles on humanity. My Name is Metric Clay who is trying to keep this doomsday cult from starting World War 3 by using "Star Wars" and other weapons of Mass Destruction against humanity. The peace treaties are being broken by this terrorist doomsday cult that is a threat to National Security and foreign policy that has been using the Military and agencies for mass destruction weapons even space satellite weapons that are call "Star Wars."
http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/SpaceLaw/links.html And http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/program/index.html http://www.shundahai.org/star_wars.htm And http://www.nowis.org/
There have been some technological developments in weaponry of which many are unaware. Weapons exist that use lasers, which can temporalty or permanently blind enemy soldiers. There are also sonic weapons that can vibrate the insides of humans to stun them, nauseate them, or even "liquefy their bowels and reduce them to quivering diarrhetic messes" as a Pentagon puts it. The unstoppable Uncle Sam has already dominantly polluted and militarized the land, sea, and air, so now he seeks to bring weaponry to outer space, in violation of such treaties as the ABM (Anti-Ballistic Missiles) Treaty. If "star wars" is successfully developed, nonconforming countries will be punished from space, and the world will be thoroughly policed and dominated by self-serving politicians. American troops will only need to enter countries for mop-up operations, making the mass slayings even more impersonal. The US Air Force predicts that in next two decades "new technologies will allow the fielding of space-based weapons of devastating effectiveness to be used to deliver energy as mass as force projection in tactical and strategic conflict.... These advances will enable lasers with reasonable mass and cost to affect very many kills." Isn't it great to know we'll be able to kill more women and children per American tax dollar?
THE INVISIBLE THIRD WORLD WAR
BY
W.H. Bowart and Richard SuttonTable of Contents 27.9.1990
http://www.adacomp.net/~mcherney/bowart.htm
(Synoptic Chapter Outline)
I. THE MAGIC ARSENAL -- INTRODUCTION
The first atomic explosion at Alamagordo, N.M. in - 1944 was a flash of insight to the warriors of the modern world. That flash changed the nature of war forever. The men who built the bomb immediately realized that conventional war was suddenly a dangerous trigger which, at any time, might detonate an earth destroying retaliation with nuclear weapons. The realities of nuclear war made civilian populations the target of war, and thus changed the nature of even limited, conventional war. Gun powder now became the tool of non-nuclear nations and revolutionaries who would fight long protracted conflicts, tempting the nuclear powers that be. Just as nuclear war changed the nature of conventional war, it made Invisible War (IW) a necessity. The only safe way to wage war, the warriors realized, was to wage it silently. Toward the end of World War Two various forms of IW research began, and eventually modern warriors came up with a number of insidious ways to subdue enemy populations without their ever knowing that a war hadeven begun. Today secret "invisible weapons" pose a more ominous threat to life than even thermonuclear holocaust. These weapons have not only been developed without the knowledge of their intended victims, they cannot even be detected at the very moment they are murdering or robotizing civilian populations. Only by lifting the veil of secrecy and informing humanity of the realities of IW can free people everywhere survive to liberate themselves from the bleak, unliveable future promised by the technology of Invisible War.
PART ONE -- CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE
II. THE SECRET PLAGUES.
Governments do experiment on their own citizens. In the Soviet Union the victims never talk, but in a supposed free society if they can remember they have been victimized they might even sue. A secret CIA-Army team infected Americans with deadly germs from 1949 to 1969. Equipped with nasal filters and other protective gear, these cladestine agents of OPERATION BIG CITY targeted Hawaii, Alaska, New York, Florida, and California with biological weapons (BW). Using trick suitcases and a 1954 Mercury equipped with dual mufflers and extended tailpipes, the spooks cast their clouds of plague along four New York City turnpikes and through the commuter-choked Licoln and Holland tunnels. Attacks on Florida and New York were followed by epidemics of encephalitis and whooping cough. Thirty years after a secret attack on San Francisco Bay launched from a Naval vessel in 1950, victims finally responded with angry lawsuits against the government. (1) Government agents also injected thousands of unsuspecting Americans with germs such as syphilis. (2) Similar incidents occurred in Britain and the Soviet Union. The full grisly story can be told now that formerly secret BW documents have been released after nearly 30 years. Just the tip of the invisible iceberg, the fact that innocent civilians have been victimized by their own governments drives home the threat posed by today's invisible technologies of war.
III. MICROBIOLOGICAL HOLOCAUST
Warriors have been busy with BW weapons since the prehistoric days when shamans first poisoned their enemies. (3) The memory of the political use of disease during the Crusades and Inquisition may have been too fresh in Hitler's mind to allow him to unleash the vast germ arsenal amassed by Nazi scientists (4). The Japanese, however, had no such compunctions, and, after the war, Germ Warfare trials were held which convicted a number of their war criminals. Those trials, more sensational than the Nuremburg trials, got little attention from the press of the day. BW was next used in Korea, then in Vietnam (5). Perhaps the most hideous story is that of the leakage of anthrax germs from weapons in the remote secret city of Semipalatinsk in the Soviet Union. There, just a few years ago, hundreds died in horrible agony (6). Current developments in Recombinant DNA threaten to unleash mutant BW strains from which the world may never recover(7). Despite international treaty, most nations today cheat when it comes to BW (8). According to recently released Pentagon documents, the Soviets may have used both BW and CW weapons in Afghanistan.
http://www.peaceinspace.com/sp_act.shtml
U.S. SPACE PRESERVATION ACT OF 2002
2nd SESSION 107th CONGRESS
H.R. 3616, The Space Preservation Act of 2002
INTRODUCED JANUARY 23rd, 2002
H.R.3616 has been assigned to the House Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Introduced by Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH)
http://www.peaceinspace.com/sp_treaty.shtml
WORLD SPACE PRESERVATION TREATY
The States Parties to this Treaty
Reaffirming the importance and urgency of preventing an arms race in outer space and of approving concrete proposals on confidence building which could prevent such an arms race, as set out in United Nations General Assembly Resolutions 56/535 and 55/32 on the prevention of an arms race in outer space, Recognizing the common interest of all humankind in the exploration and non-weapons use of outer space for peaceful purposes, Reaffirming the will of all States that the exploration and use of outer space, including the Moon, the planets and other celestial bodies, shall be for weapons-free, peaceful purposes and shall be carried out for the benefit and in the interest of all countries, irrespective of their degree of economic or scientific development, Reaffirming the provisions of articles III and IV of the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, Resolution 2222(XXI), annex, Recalling the obligations of all States to observe the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations regarding the use or threat of use of force in their international relations, including in their space activities,
http://www.cdi.org/space-security/laws.cfm
SPACE SECURITY
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=17329
Space Wars: Apocalypse Soon?
By Bill Berkowitz,http://www.workingforchange.com
December 8, 2003
October was a busy month for two U.S. Lieutenant Generals, and they weren't even in Iraq. Lt. Gen. William "Jerry" Boykin hit the headlines when it was discovered that he had been visiting fundamentalist Christian churches across the country delivering speeches sprinkled with anti-Muslim bigotry. Dressed in full military regalia, Lt. Gen. Boykin equated the "war on terrorism" with the "war against Satan," disparaged Islam, and claimed that President Bush was "appointed by God." While Lt. Gen. Boykin's remarks had an Apocalypse Now vibe to them, the other Lieutenant General - Lt. Gen. Edward Anderson, a deputy commander of US Northern Command - was more focused on Apocalypse Soon: He told an audience at a geospatial intelligence conference in New Orleans that war in space was, well, pretty much inevitable.
LASER WEAPONRY IN SPACE
http://people.howstuffworks.com/framed.htm?parent=space-war.htm&url=http://www.au.af.mil/au/database/projects/ay1998/awc/98-197ex.pdf
We might bear in mind, for example, that the U.S. was condemned by the world court for "unlawful use of force" (international terrorism) and then vetoed a security council resolution calling on all states (meaning the us) to adhere to international law. Only one of countless examples. But to keep to the narrow question -- the terrorism of others directed against us -- we know quite well how the problem should be addressed, if we want to reduce the threat rather than escalate it.
EARTH JUSTICE
http://www.earthjustice.org/regional/international/HRE-Report-2003.pdf
The United Nation has written some documents on Racism, Racial Discrimination and Xenophobia which tells of the false injustices that I have been talking about in these web sites about the vigilante false judgment of racism.
XENOPHOBIA AND RACISM, RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
11. Urges Governments to take all necessary measures against incitement to racial hatred, including through print, audio -visual and electronic media;
12. Urges all States to intensify their efforts for the implementation of the obligations they have accepted under article 4 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, with due regard to the principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and to article 5 of the Convention, with respect to:(a) Declaring an offence punishable by law all dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority or hatred, incitement to racial discrimination, as well as all acts of violence or incitement to such acts, against any race or group of persons of another colour or ethnic origin, and also the provision of any assistance to racist activities, including the financing thereof;
(b) Declaring illegal and prohibiting organizations, and also organized and all other propaganda activities, which promote and incite racial discrimination, and recognizing participation in such organizations or activities as an offence punishable by law;
(c) Not permitting public authorities or public institutions, national or local, to promote or incite racial discrimination;
13. Calls upon all States, where appropriate, to strengthen their national legislation and institutions for the promotion of racial harmony and notes the conclusions and recommendations of the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance in this regard, including those on the importance of integration of vulnerable groups in mainstream societies;
14. Invites all States, in their efforts aimed at promoting racial harmony, to involve, or, as necessary, to establish, national institutions and other appropriate organizations;
15. Welcomes the active role played by non-governmental organizations in combating racism and assisting individual victims of racist acts;
16. Encourages the mass media to promote ideas of tolerance and understanding among peoples and between different cultures and to refrain from disseminating racist and xenophobic ideas through all appropriate means, such as codes of conduct;
17. Takes note with interest of general recommendation XV (42) of 17 March 1993 of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination on article 4 of the International Convention
Beginning to Enforce a New U.S. Law Against War & Racism
1. by PeaceNet
http://www.totse.com/en/conspiracy/the_new_world_order/new-law.html
PEACENET BULLETIN 20 February 1994
BEGINNING TO ENFORCE NEW U.S. LAW AGAINST WAR & RACISM
On September 8, 1992, the United States adopted a law proclaiming:
"1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.
"2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law." Art. 20.
This law also is explicit about the right to live:
"Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life." [Capital punishment is forbidden for persons below 18 and pregnant women.]
Is it possible this law was really adopted and never reported in U.S. media?
Yes.
The law was signed by Pres. Jimmy Carter in 1977 and adopted by the U.S. Senate by 2/3 vote on April 2, 1992, deposited by Pres. George Bush on June 8, 1992, becoming effective on Sept. 8, 1992. It is part of the supreme law of the land because it is a ratified treaty entitled the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Article 20 of this Civil Rights Covenant is quoted above.
Reading additional articles may help explain why the media has not reported adoption of this law.
Article 1 proclaims:
"All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development." [What, then, about the peoples living in Puerto Rico, District of Columbia, U.S. "reservations," Guam, etc.?]
"All peoples may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources ... "
Article 2 goes far beyond the written words of the U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Reconstruction Amendments, proclaiming:
"[The United States] undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction the rights recognized in the present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. [underlined words all new.]
Article 3 continues, explicitly:
U.S.A. HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS CONTINUE
http://www.homestead.com/emscandal/files/july02.htm
Criminal Accountability for Human Rights Abusers
Hosted and Maintained by the World Organization Against Torture USA
http://www.criminalaccountability.org/
This site provides a comprehensive summary and analysis of all of the major legal issues that have been raised in criminal prosecutions of torturers and other human rights abusers, applying the principles of criminal accountability and universal jurisdiction that were used initially as a basis for the Pinochet case in the United Kingdom.
CRIMINAL ACCOUNTABILITY is the most important new direction being taken in human rights in many years. It builds on anti-Holocaust and war crimes principles by making it possible for victims and non-governmental groups to initiate and participate in criminal prosecutions of major human rights abusers. Every government, every survivor of torture and every human rights advocacy group becomes akin to a private attorney general, with the power and responsibility to bring abusers to justice. What is particularly promising about this approach is that it has considerably more potential for punishing violators, and for deterring future violations, than most of the more traditional types of human rights compliance efforts. Especially after the Pinochet Case, no torturer can feel free to leave their own jurisdiction without opening themselves up to the possibility of criminal prosecution anywhere in the world. This site provides a comprehensive summary and analysis of all of the major legal issues that have been raised in criminal prosecutions of torturers and other human rights abusers, applying the principles of criminal accountability and universal jurisdiction that were used initially as a basis for the Pinochet case in the United Kingdom. In addition to compiling the legal analyses and research relevant to these types of cases, this site also provides background information on how these principles have been applied in the past. These legal research materials have been made available to help provide prosecutors and advocates with the tools they will need to support the development and initiation of criminal prosecutions applying the concepts of criminal accountability and universal jurisdiction to human rights cases. These materials have been prepared by and on behalf of the World Organization Against Torture USA (WOAT) for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. These materials are intended only to provide basic background in addressing the issues herein, and are not a substitute for independent professional legal research and analysis. WOAT and its agents make no representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the information provided on this Web site or on any third-party Web site which may be accessed by a link from this Web site, including any representations or warranties as to suitability, reliability, applicability, merchantability, fitness, noninfringement, result, outcome, accuracy, timeliness or completeness. Any implied warranties are expressly disclaimed. WOAT and its agents will not be responsible for any action or failure to act in reliance upon information on this Web site or any third-party Web site which may be accessed by a link from this Web site. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking the advice of professional counsel. By accessing this Web site, you agree that WOAT and its agents are not liable to you or others, in any way or for any damages of any kind or under any theory, arising from this Web site, or your access to or use of or reliance on the information in or through this Web site, including but not limited to liability or damages under contract or tort theories or any damages caused by viruses contained within electronic files of this Web site or any linked Web site, regardless of prior notice to WOAT or its agents.
World Organization Against Torture USA
1725 K Street NW / Suite 610 / Washington, DC 20006
202-296-5702 www.woatusa.org
HUMAN RIGHTS ACCOUNTABILITY
2. By Sandra Coliver, AlterNet
November 10, 2003
Amnesty International and other credible sources estimate that at least 1,000 human rights abusers now live in the United States. Dozens more visit every year. They come from more than 70 countries, including Bosnia, Cambodia, Chile, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, India, Liberia, Pakistan, Peru, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sri Lanka and Vietnam. Only a few dozen of them have been deported, in addition to the 48 who were deported or extradited for Nazi-era crimes. No human rights abuser has been criminally prosecuted for torture in the U.S., despite the fact that Congress adopted a law in 1994 that gives U.S. courts jurisdiction to prosecute such crimes. Nonetheless, progress is being made in the U.S. for survivors who want to hold their tormentors accountable. Two laws are enabling that progress. The Alien Tort Claims Act, passed by Congress in 1789, allows non-U.S. citizens to bring civil lawsuits for "torts ... committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United Sates." Beginning in 1980, U.S. courts have recognized that egregious human rights abuses such as torture violate the law of nations and that claims for such abuses are actionable. The second law is the Torture Victim Protection Act, which Congress passed in 1991. It extends the right to U.S. citizens to bring claims against individuals "acting under the actual or apparent authority of any foreign nation" for torture and extrajudicial killing. Since 1980, a total of 17 perpetrators have been successfully sued, of whom four were brought to justice since 2001. Of those, five who had come to the United States with the intention of settling here fled the country rather than face the consequences of a lawsuit. These five perpetrators from the Philippines, Rwanda, Haiti, Indonesia and Bosnia had their lives substantially disrupted. Another perpetrator, the Philipine ex-dictator Ferdinand Marcos, was required to pay $1 billion. When Corazon Aquino became president, she determined, and the plaintiffs agreed, that most of that money should be returned to the Philippine government. Nonetheless, the lawsuit played a significant role in persuading the Swiss, and other banks that were holding Marcos' assets in secret accounts, to turn that money over. Three of the perpetrators successfully sued were high-ranking government officials the Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic, an Indonesian General who had ordered atrocities in East Timor, and a Guatemalan ex-General. They were sued while they were on visits to the United States. All have yet to return. If they did, there is little that could be done to them legally, except that the plaintiffs could try to attach the assets that they carried with them. Yet the fact that they have not returned is a clear signal the lawsuits caused them an embarrassment they do not wish to repeat. One of those who was sued in this way was Hector Gramajo, a Guatemalan ex-general who was grooming himself to run for the presidency of his country. He had come to the United States to obtain a degree from the Kennedy School at Harvard. On his graduation day, he was served with the lawsuit. He immediately returned to Guatemala, where his party decided not to choose him as their candidate for president. His inability to travel in the United States without embarrassment was a liability. Gramajo's political ambitions were nipped in the bud by the lawsuit.
In July 2002, three Salvadoran torture survivors won a $54.6 million judgment against Salvadoran Generals Vides Casanova and Garcia, both former Ministers of Defense who had retired to Florida in 1989. A Florida jury determined that they bore command responsibility for the torture endured by the plaintiffs between 1979 and 1983. The case set major precedents concerning the doctrine of command responsibility in civil cases. The legal team has already secured $270,000 (most of which the plaintiffs will devote to bringing more cases) and expects to obtain more. The case has triggered discussions in El Salvador about the need to confront the past and to hold individuals accountable. One member of Congress in El Salvador has called for the repeal of the 1993 Amnesty law. Maria Julia Hernandez, director of the Human Rights Office of the Archdiocese of El Salvador stated that: "The process and the verdict in this case are accomplishments in a long and most difficult fight against impunity. It is a case in which all the victims of El Salvador who have not been able to be plaintiffs emerged and were represented by these brothers and this sister. Such administration of justice is what we have always hoped to realize. Now each of us has been touched in a way that inspires us to continue on this road." On October 15 of this year, a Miami federal jury awarded $4 million to the Cabello family for the torture and murder of their brother, Chilean economist Winston Cabello. Cabello was killed on October 17, 1973 almost 30 years earlier to the day. The civil jury found Armando Fernandez Larios, in his role as a member of the "Caravan of Death" a military squad acting under orders of Augusto Pinochet liable for crimes against humanity, extrajudicial killing, torture, and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. The trial marks the first time that any Chilean has been tried in the United States for Pinochet-era crimes committed in Chile. It is also the first jury verdict in the United States holding a defendant liable for crimes against humanity. In September 2003, a lawsuit was filed against Alvaro Saravia, named in numerous credible reports as having played a key role in the 1980 assassination of revered Salvadoran Archbishop Oscar Romero. Saravia has been living in the United States since 1986. This case could lead to his arrest and deportation and to the uncovering of information about the intellectual authors of the crime. These cases send a powerful message to officials, soldiers, and others around the world that if they commit atrocities, they will not be able to visit or live in the United States with impunity. They will know that someone may recognize them and bring them to justice. A surprising number of survivors have told us that they consider this to be a substantial penalty because the wealthy and powerful in their countries look forward to visiting the United States for tourism, medical reasons, retirement or to send their children to school. These cases send a message to such people who thought they were above the law that they are not above the law in the United States. The deterrent potential of such cases will grow over time as more and more of these cases are brought in the U.S. and around the world.
Sandra Coliver is the Executive Director of the Center for Justice & Accountability (CJA), based in San Francisco. She brought several of the cases described in this article. Contact her at scoliver@cja.org. A version of this article appeared on www.americas.org
AMERICA'S HIDDEN HUMAN RIGHTS PROBLEM
1. By Mark Weisbrot, AlterNet
December 9, 2003
"Unions the Folks Who Brought You the Weekend," reads a popular union T-shirt. It's true enough and we could add a sizeable list of other benefits that most people associate with social progress: employer-sponsored health insurance, pensions, and paid vacations. But unions in the United States find themselves increasingly having to fight for their very existence. This week, on International Human Rights Day (December 10), thousands of union members and their allies around the country will demonstrate for the right to organize. This is something that was supposedly established here in 1935 during the New Deal. But this right has been so eroded in recent decades that to the disgrace of the world's richest democracy it hardly exists at all. That was the conclusion of a 213-page report by Human Rights Watch, one of the world's largest human rights organizations, written three years ago. And it keeps getting worse. Tens of thousands of workers are fired each year for joining or attempting to organize a union, in violation of U.S. law. But the penalties for employers are so slight that they have what Human Rights Watch calls "a culture of near impunity." Employers can also refuse to negotiate for years with a union even after it is recognized, effectively negating their legal obligation to bargain. And while they can't legally fire workers for striking, they can hire "permanent replacements" a distinction without much difference. From high-tech computer programmers in Redmond, Washington, to minimum wage employees in South Florida Nursing Homes, Human Rights Watch found that workers' rights to organize and bargain collectively were routinely denied. Abandoning this basic right to freedom of association has had enormous economic consequences. It is no coincidence that the United States, with one of the lowest rates of unionization in the developed world, is the only high-income country without a national health insurance system. Or that Europeans enjoy five weeks of vacation on average as compared to less than three for Americans. Perhaps more drastically, the decline of organized labor from 30 percent of the labor force in the 1960s to 13 percent today has contributed greatly to the most massive upward redistribution of income in American history. The majority of the U.S. labor force has barely seen any of the enormous productivity gains of the last thirty years reflected in their wages. This is in sharp contrast to the first half of the post-World War II period (1946-1973), during which productivity gains were broadly shared and the median wage rose by nearly 80 percent. The United States is each year becoming more like Latin America and other much poorer countries in its economic and social division into haves and have-nots. Legislative reform is long overdue, and there is currently a bill in Congress (S. 1925 in the Senate and H.R. 3619 in the House) that could make a big difference. The "Employee Free Choice Act" would allow for unions to be certified on the basis of member signatures, or "card check." In other words, if the National Labor Relations Board certifies that a majority of employees have signed up to join a union, this would be sufficient. Under the current system, signature gathering is followed by a vote on whether to approve the union. Very often a large majority of employees does indeed sign up for the union, but the employer then uses coercion (firings, warnings of re-location and other threats, "captive audience" meetings) to force a "no" vote. The bill would also attempt to enforce workers' rights to organize by allowing the courts to use injunctions and fines against employers who break the law. It also provides for mediation and, if that fails, binding arbitration in negotiations for a first contract. This is necessary to prevent employers from stalling for as long as 12 years after a union is certified. The right to freedom of association is a fundamental human right, and it is a national embarrassment that our society and legal system do not recognize this right for American employees. A recent Peter Hart poll found that 47 percent of non-union workers about 50 million people would opt for a union in their workplace if they could. This legislation won't make their wish come true overnight, but it's a good start.
Mark Weisbrot is Co-Director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C.
Anti-Terrorism Bill Is Approved
Bush Cheers House's Quick Action, but Civil Liberties Advocates Are Alarmed
By John Lancaster
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, October 13, 2001; Page A01
The House yesterday approved a far-reaching anti-terrorism bill that in most respects mimics legislation that cleared the Senate late Thursday, conferring broad new powers on law enforcement and intelligence agencies to conduct domestic surveillance and share information with each other. Incontrast to the Senate version, several of the more controversial aspects of the House bill -- relating to wiretapping and other forms of electronic surveillance -- would expire after five years, at which time they would have to be renewed. The Senate bill also includes a comprehensive set of money-laundering provisions that House leaders have elected to consider as separate legislation. Those and other, smaller differences will have to be reconciled in a conference committee before President Bush can sign the measure, although that could happen as early as next week. The blistering pace of the legislation through Congress shows just how much the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon have altered the political landscape in Washington. Many of the provisions contained in the House and Senate bills have been sought for years by prosecutors, but were rejected by Congress as overly intrusive and possibly unconstitutional. Now lawmakers are eager to accommodate the wishes of the FBI and CIA -- alarming civil liberties advocates who warn that Congress is being stampeded into decisions it will later regret.
APPENDIX B: COMMISSION CHARTER AND PROCESS
Commission History
The National Commission on Terrorism was established by Section 591of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriation Act, 1999 (as contained in the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1999 (P.L. 105-277). The legislation called for the appointment of 10 commissioners, three selected by the Majority Leader of the Senate, three by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and two each by the Minority Leaders of the Senate and House of Representatives.
Congress gave the Commission six months to review the laws, regulations, directives, policies and practices for preventing and punishing international terrorism directed against the United States, assess their effectiveness, and recommend changes. The Commission held 14 plenary meetings, generally meeting twice per month. During its meetings, the Commission was briefed by both government witnesses and outside experts. A number of Commissioners met with representatives of the governments of Canada, Egypt, France, Israel, Jordan, Poland, and the United Kingdom to address various international terrorism issues, including cooperation between those countries and the United States. Several Commissionersparticipated in non-plenary meetings dealing with particular issues, and Commission staff interviewed additional witnesses. (See List of Witnesses at Appendix D) Excerpts from the Report of the Policy Working Group on the United Nations and Terrorism
Disarmament Recommendation 18
Consideration should be given to the establishment of a mechanism under the Department for Disarmament Affairs that would produce a biennial public report on the potential use of weapons of mass destruction in terrorist acts. This mechanism would make use of existing United Nations resources and specialized databases, as well as information received from Member States, and could serve as a barometer of terrorist danger. Furthermore, this mechanism could be available to assist the Committee, either directly, by providing analysis and advice, or indirectly, by recommending appropriate cooperation between the Security Council (or the Committee) and the relevant operational agencies, such as the International Atomic Energy Agency or the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. The aforementioned report could be linked to the periodic review of legislation referred to in recommendation 2 above and, if deemed appropriate, submitted to the General Assembly so as to draw the attention of the membership to this important
issue.
Recommendation 19
The development of the technical capabilities of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons and the World Health Organization to provide assistance to States in the event of the threat or use of weapons of mass destruction, other weapons and technologies should be encouraged.
Recommendation 20
Arrangements through which specialized agencies or related organizations can provide assistance and advice to States on how to develop and maintain adequate civil defence capability against the use of weapons of mass destruction, other weapons or technologies should be facilitated.
Recommendation 21
Relevant United Nations offices should be tasked with producing proposals to reinforce ethical norms, and the creation of codes of conduct forscientists, through international and national scientific societies and institutions that teach sciences or engineering skills related to weapons technologies, should be encouraged. Such codes of conduct would aim to prevent the involvement of defence scientists or technical experts in
terrorist activities and restrict public access to knowledge and expertise on the development, production, stockpiling and use of weapons of mass destruction or related technologies.
Preventive measures
Recommendation 24
The Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention and the Department for Disarmament Affairs should study the links between terrorism and organized crime, including drug trafficking, money-laundering, illicit trafficking of arms and corruption, which provide an environment that enables terrorist operations to expand. This threat to world peace has been going on for a long time, and they have been braking the treaties of peace for their own apocalyptic mass murderous cult purposes. These false leaders that claim to be messiahs are great fabricators that take the law into their own hand which is the vigilante while putting millions of lives in danger by braking the peace treaties with threats against innocent civilians. In the last 35-40 years I have been stalked by these apocalyptic mass murderous terrorists I am 42 years old now but the policy braking cult who claims that you are a criminal from birth and that you should be stalked with weapons of mass destruction to control you which is a lie but racist insanity because they have been trying to murder me through illegal privacy invasions from space and other materials like electric wiring and radar using weapons that the military and agencies are using for mass destruction threats. These terrorists are going to be a threat to the children that they stalk with missiles to kill them are to get them into trouble so, that they can eventually condemn them for their interferences. These terrorists have been lying about me my whole life while interfering they don't want to even take responsibility for their interferences with my life that brakes the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that says in Article 12. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks. http://www.terrorism.com/ The military has been trying to control the citizens of the U.S.A. with these new weapons like Electromagnetic Radiation(emr) Weapons: As A Powerful As The Atomic Bomb. The intimate liaisons with army psyops specialists raise serious doubts about CNN's journalistic integrity and independence. The military CNN-personnel belonged to the airmobile Fourth Psychological Operations Group, stationed at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. One of the main tasks of this group of almost 1200 soldiers and officers is to spread 'selected information'. American psyops troops try with a variety of techniques to influence media and public opinion in armed conflicts in which American state interests are said to be at stake. The propaganda group was involved in the Gulf war, the Bosnian war and the crisis in Kosovo. The Posse Comitatus act of 1878 is still suppose to be enforced in America and even the September 11attack didn't cause this act to be abolished so, how can any one claim that these military interferences isn't illegal. The authors of the American constitution sought to establish and preserve a clear separation of the military from the civilian realms.
THE POSSE COMITATUS ACT OF 1878
20 Stat. L., 145
June 18, 1878
CHAP. 263 - An act making appropriations for the support of the Army for the fiscal year ending June thirtieth, eighteen hundred and seventy-nine, and for other purposes. SEC. 15. From and after the passage of this act it shall not be lawful to employ any part of the Army of the United States, as a posse comitatus, or otherwise, for the purpose of executing the laws, except in such cases and under such circumstances as such employment of said force may be expressly authorized by the Constitution or by act of Congress; and no money appropriated by this act shall be used to pay any of the expenses incurred in the employment of any troops in violation of this section. And any person willfully violating the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction thereof shall be punished by fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars or imprisonment not exceeding two years or by both such fine and imprisonment. 10 U.S.C. (United States Code) 375 Sec. 375. Restriction on direct participation by military personnel: The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to ensure that any activity (including the provision of any equipment or facility or the assignment or detail of any personnel) under this chapter does not include or permit direct participation by a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps in a search, seizure, arrest, or other similar. Instead they rather lie all the time and then threaten weapons of apocalyptic mass destruction while braking your civil liberties and civil rights with Confederate Civil War tactics. These Confederates will do just about anything to get back even, even joining with the Nazis and Mafia to threaten American Citizens for slavery purposes.
http://www.splcenter.org/intel/map/hate.jsp
The Emancipation Proclamation
1864 By the President of the United States of America: A PROCLAMATION Whereas on the 22nd day of September, A.D. 1862, a proclamation was issued by the President of the United States, containing, among other things, the following, to wit: "That on the 1st day of January, A.D. 1863, all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; and the executive government of the United States, including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons and will do no act or acts to repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom. These anti-Americans who hate the American Flag that stands for peace and freedom that this nation fought for is being challenged by Confederates that knew about the September 11 attacks but because of the freedoms that American Citizens have they let it happen and trained them in the south in Florida and Georgia for the attack.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,583254,00.html
http://www.robertscheer.com/1_natcolumn/01_columns/052201.htm
http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot/
These Patriot Acts are what is happening because of the Anti-American treason of the Confederate South that is still plaguing this nation with Slavery just in 1995 did Mississippi abolish slavery. This treasonist cult that has authority in the Government and military is using it to hire terrorists and illegal immigrates from other drug Cartel nations like Mexico, Columbia, and Bolivia for terrorism against the freedoms that so many Americans died for since the Civil War. The Patriot Act is what the nation should try to use the right way but just as I was reading the Article by Anthony D. Romero which shows that they're not going to do the right thing but is going to just take away the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties that we have by abusing the law "Color of law" is a legal term used in official misconduct cases. It means that the law enforcement officer acted while abusing the authority given to him or her by reason of his or her employment as a public official. This happen with the COINTELPRO's program that was support to stop the terrorist in this nation but helped the Klu Klux Klan and other white supremacist groups. Here is some quotes from COINTELPRO'S PROGRAM The committee finds that covert action programs have been used to disrupt the lawful political activities of individual Americans and groups and to discredit them, using dangerous and degrading tactics which are abhorrent in a free and decent society. Subfindings (A) although the claimed purposes of these action programs were to protect the national security and to prevent violence, many of the victims were concededly nonviolent, were not controlled by a foreign power, and posed no threat to the national security. (B) the acts taken interfered with the first amendment rights of citizens. They were explicitly intended to deter citizens from joining groups, "Neutralize" those who were already members, and prevent or inhibit the expression of ideas. (C) the tactics used against Americans often risked and sometimes caused serious emotional, economic, or physical damage. Actions were taken which were designed to break up marriages, terminate funding or employment, and encourage gang warfare between violent rival groups. Due process of law forbids the use of such covert tactics, whether the victims are innocent law-abiding citizens or members of groups suspected of involvement in violence. (D) the sustained use of such tactics by the FBI in an attempt to destroy Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., violated the law and fundamental human decency. Elaboration of the findings for fifteen years from 1956 until 1971, the F.B.I. carried out a series of covert action programs directed against American citizens. These "Counterintelligenceprograms" (shortened to the acronym cointelpro) resulted in part from frustration with supreme court rulings limiting the government's.http://terrorismexperts.org/
The abortion law that the Congress passed is one that the United States accepted by law to uphold by these illegal privacy invasions that a threat to mankind complains about this law that has given the women the freedom to choice but I know that they don't care about life any way but just to harass you and get you upset to try to make you want to kill your self they do these things on purpose.
http://www.overture.com/d/search/p/juno/?Partner=netzero_juno_home&Keywords=Roe%20vs%20wade THE ACLJ HAS A COMMENTARY ON THE NATIONAL SIN OF AMERICA
http://www.aclj.org/features/commentaries/national_sin.asp
In Anthony article states that were opposing new Bush anti-civil initiatives in Congress. The ACLU has been exceptionally active on Capitol Hill all year, urging members of Congress to have the political will to challenge ill-conceived and hastily crafted provisions of the PATRIOT Act. We're also stopping privacy-stealing initiatives like the Terrorist Information Awareness database project and opposing the Justice Department's efforts to persuade Congress to extend the time limits that apply to some portions of the act. The Declaration of Independence states that We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.----That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,----That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
US Military Non-Lethal Weapons Submitted by MCCLOSL@towers.com
http://www.rense.com/political/weapons/usnonlethal.htm
mailto:MCCLOSL@towers.comhttp://www.cdsar.af.mil/apj/mcgowan.html
Nonlethal weapons are defined as "weapons that are designed to disable personnel, weapons, supplies, or equipment in such a way that death or severe permanent disability to personnel are unlikely. General Principles of the Law of Armed Conflict International law does not enumerate those acts that may be committed in the name of military necessity. Guidance is found in United States v. List, when the international military tribunal at Nuremberg determined that ... "Military necessity permits a belligerent, subject to the laws of war, to apply any amount and kind of force to compel the complete submission of the enemy with the least possible expenditure of time, life, and money. . . . There must be some reasonable connection between the destruction of property and the overcoming of the enemy."
The Rule of Proportionality
The concept of proportionality calls for a reasonable relationship between the amount of destruction caused and the military significance of the attack.19 The principles of humanity and military necessity are applied together. Proportionality requires that the loss of life and the damage not be disproportionate to the expected military advantage. "Proportionality represents a movable fulcrum on which necessity humanity scale may be balanced."20 The law recognizes that a military activity will result in some loss of life and property, but the action is illegal if the loss exceeds the military advantage.
Principles Governing Weapons
International law establishes certain principles governing the prohibition of weapons. Two such principles are unnecessary suffering and indiscriminate effects caused by certain weapons.
Unnecessary Suffering
Article 23(e) of the 1907 Hague Convention prohibits the use of "arms, projectiles or materials calculated to cause unnecessary suffering."21 This concept has been the subject of much concern as there is no precise definition of unnecessary suffering. As stated in Air Force Pamphlet (AFP) 11031, International Law: The Conduct of Armed Conflict, all weapons causesuffering.22 The St. Petersburg Declaration speaks in terms of arms that uselessly aggravate "the sufferings of disabled men or render their death inevitable."
Indiscriminate Effects
A primary concern of the law of armed conflict is the protection of noncombatants. A belligerent may not attack a noncombatant and must cancel an attack on a legitimate military target if the injury to the noncombatant population would be disproportionate. Belligerents cannot employ a "blind" weapon, one that cannot discriminate between noncombatants and combatants. Restraints Imposed by Custom or Treaty A weapon that complies with the general principles of the law may not be used in a manner that is restricted by custom or treaty. The Hague conventions underline that there are restrictions on the conduct of war in Article 22, which provides that "the right of belligerents to adopt means of injuring the enemy is not unlimited." Weapons may be used only against military objectives. An object is considered to be a military object if its use, nature, location, or purpose make effective contribution to the military action.23 Some objects are considered dual use objects. They meet the needs of the civilian population but also effectively contribute to the enemies military action. These objects may be attacked if there is a military advantage to be gained by their attack. During Desert Storm, the coalition forces bombed bridges across the Euphrates River, not only to restrict the movement of enemy forces but to sever the communications systems. The bridges contained fiberoptic links that provided Saddam Hussein with a communications system to his forces.24 The attack produced a military advantage for the coalition forces. The attack may only be against lawful combatants. The LOAC prohibits attack against noncombatants or civilian property. Again, attacks against military targets may result in injury to protected persons and property. It is the attackers' responsibility to minimize collateral damage against protected persons and property. Places such as buildings dedicated to religion, art, science, charitable purposes, historic monuments, and hospitals are protected from attack.25 The Hague Convention also prohibits the use of poison,26 treachery, and perfidy.27 Emblems of protection such as the Red Cross must be respected.28 There are rules governing the use of uniforms and certain signals.29 Assassination is prohibited.30
http://www.cdsar.af.mil/apj/mcgowan.html
The Illegal Privacy invasion also targets your driving automobile that President Bush has banded but they say that it is bogus On June 17th, the U.S. Department of Justice announced that President Bush had ordered a ban on racial profiling in all federal law enforcement. The news release and accompanying proclamation were loaded with moral platitudes about the evils of stereotyping and racial bias in criminal justice. They reiteratedPresident Bush's dramatic promise to end racial profiling in America. This is what is happening to me by the terrorist that is stalking me with "Enemy of the State" tactics of criminalization to threaten me with imprisonment while threatening to sleep with my children and wife.
The Marriage Protection Act: H.R. 3313 10/31/2003
By Michael Schwartz http://www.cwfa.org/articles/4806/CWA/family/index.htm
These terrorists is using equipment to change their voice to that of your families to use it about your past but they have been stalking me with illegal privacy invasions as long as I can remember even at my Job that were interfering and have a lot of illegal information about me to threaten we to payback everything that I have done in my life even their interferences. My religious freedom is being attacked by this illegal privacy invasion cult that interferences with my first Amendment right of freedom of religion with threatening of bombing, and false claims of crimes against me that isn't even in no Police Authority records. I don't have a criminal record that someone who is suppose to be righteous is going by but by their interferences of entrapment that they have been doing against me since I was a boy. This is war with the weaponry and in war you cross boundaries and borders because you're an civilian. In other words this means that you have to survive the best way you know how to but by not trying to be injuries to others on purpose.
http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/92.htm
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lawofwar/geneva07.htm
Convention (IV) Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, August 12, 1949 The undersigned Plenipotentiaries of the Governments represented at the Diplomatic Conference held at Geneva from 21 April to 12 August 1949, for the purpose of establishing a Convention for the Protection of Civilians in Time of War, have agreed as follows:
PART I
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Art 1. The High Contracting Parties undertake to respect and to ensure respect for the present Convention in all circumstances. Art. 2. In addition to the provisions which shall be implemented in peace-time, the present Convention shall apply to all cases of declared war or of any other armed conflict which may arise between two or more of the High Contracting Parties, even if the state of war is not recognized by one of them. The Convention shall also apply to all cases of partial or total occupation of the territory of a High Contracting Party, even if the said occupation meets with no armed resistance. Although one of the Powers in conflict may not be a party to the present Convention, the Powers who are parties thereto shall remain bound by it in their mutual relations. They shall furthermore be bound by the Convention in relation to the said Power, if the latter accepts and applies the provisions thereof. Art. 3. In the case of armed conflict not of an international character occurring in the territory of one of the High Contracting Parties, each Party to the conflict shall be bound to apply, as a minimum, the following provisions:
THREE STRIKES LAW
The Three Strikes law, enacted by the legislature [AB 971 (1994)] became effective March 12, 1994. It states that if a defendant is found guilty of a felony and he has been previously convicted of a 'serious' [list of crimes defined as 'Serious' may be found under Penal Code Section 1192.7] and/or 'violent' [list of crimes defined as 'violent' may be found under Penal Code Section 667.5(c)] , he will be subjected to additional punishment in accordance with the guidelines set forth under the 'three strikes law' proposition. If a defendant has been previously convicted of ONE PRIOR 'STRIKE' (serious and/or violent felony) conviction, if found guilty of the present felony, he must be sentenced to state prison, and his sentence will be doubled. If a defendant has been previously convicted of TWO OR MORE PRIOR 'STRIKE' convictions, he/she will be subjected to a term of imprisonment for 25 years to life.
STATUE OF LIMITATIONS
Federal and state laws provide certain periods of time within which legalaction can be taken. Such periods of time are known as Statutes of Limitation. Statutes of limitation depending upon the particular cause of action and the law of the jurisdiction, in which the lawsuit is to be instituted. Causes of action can be preserved by filing a complaint with the proper court before the applicable statute of limitation expires. The named defendants are then served with a summons and copy of the complaint. In many instances preliminary investigation is needed in order to obtain enough information to file a lawsuit. It is important to seek the professional advice of an attorney early enough to preserve your claims. The Blackmail which means the use of threats or manipulation in an attempt to influence someone's actions by the illegal clones that aren't suppose to be in the government is a treat to my life as they blackmail and threaten me so that they can launch missiles for war. They blackmail me by braking all treaties just about known to mankind. This vigilante mass murderous cult is attempted World War 3 just playing game with billions of lives for no reason but insanity. Article I. of the Constitution States that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Article 18. Of the United Declaration of Human Rights Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance. They have only tried to get me in trouble with this illegal privacy invasion that has caused me to do some things to try to get them off of me if you can understand the enemy of the state stuff you know what I mean because it is going to affect you one way or another so, I had to do stuff to get them off me are I am trying to get them off me from the stalking and interferences. We know that if any person is threatened with a weapon that causes them to do things against their will are with mind controls technology that they're using also then they shouldn't be held accountable for their actions but the persons that is threatening you with weapons of mass destruction against your will should be held accountable because you are the victim. http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/index.htm We have the victims Right's Amendment that the legislation was debated on the Senate floor that would protect victims. These terrorists don't respect any laws because of the apocalyptic mass murderous weapons like The Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty that they keep threatening on society to control us by force. As your constituent, I urge you to support H.R. 912 and S.486 the "Innocence Protection Act." I strongly support this effort toensure that our criminal justice system is not executing innocent people.
http://www.state.gov/www/global/arms/treaties/abmpage.html
This is the occult in their practice for people to be claiming that they're above the law and then complain about the law all the time while we have the Article IV. Of the Constitution of the United States of America that says that we have The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO OF 1848
http://csf.colorado.edu/psn/marx/Archive/1848-CM/cm.html
Use communism tactics like Vietnam, Chinese and Russians against civilians to rape their minds of information against themselves then threaten them with it are with some personal information that they know about you for enslavement while we have the Fifth Amendment is just war crime. It's absolutely hypocritical of the US to punish those for maintaining their responsibility to God, life, and the planet by refusing to go to war. As previously noted, the International Military Tribunal imprisoned and executed numerous Nazis who pleaded to be "only following orders." The Tribunal declared that "the very essence of the [Tribunal's] Charter is that individuals have international duties which transcend the national obligations of obedience imposed by the individual state." If the Nazis were sentenced to death or prison for following orders and executing innocent lives, shouldn't the same so-called justice be applied to those who went to Vietnam and killed innocent civilians? http://www.angelfire.com/or/mctrl/projects.html
These technologies that the Military is using is to hack into your body,soul, and mind to rape and plant false information about people and even hypnosis the induction of a state of consciousness in which a person loses the power of voluntary action and is highly responsive to suggestion or direction. -ORIGIN from Greek hupnos 'sleep'.. This is what this mind
control does it is hacking illegally into the mind by using the Magnetic field which can cause the body to malfunction and Hallucinations. Every day we use up the magnetic field. The brain of man assimilates every second of day sending 100 million signals every second to our body cells. The magnetic field is the engine that drive every cell of every living creature allcellular communications is electro magnetic for a cell to communications with it self and with the other cells and the organ that incubates it there must be a electro magnetic energy we could not be born physically if it wasn 't for what the electro magnetic field all life processes depend on that magnetic field cell division and cellular mitosis depend on the magnetic field. If a hacker can use the Magnetic field to infiltration your body, then they can be there without you knowing it if you are not aware of the devices. These thefts are like those that hack into computer systems for information to change it steal it are plant viruses for their illegal purposes.
HOW IDENTITY THEFT OCCURS
Skilled identity thieves use a variety of methods to gain access to your personal information. From example:They get information from businesses or other institutions by: stealing records from their employer, bribing ain employee who has access to these records, or hacking into the organization's computers.
INTERNATIONAL LAW
International law does not enumerate those acts that may be committed in the name of military necessity. Guidance is found in United States v. List, when the international military tribunal at Nuremberg determined that ... "Military necessity permits a belligerent, subject to the laws of war, to apply any amount and kind of force to compel the complete submission of the enemy with the least possible expenditure of time, life, and money. . . . There must be some reasonable connection between the destruction of property and the overcoming of the enemy." Following commands to execute innocent civilians is immoral and a recognize |
| 36 | UK | The mass killing must STOP. Why are you planning more? |
| 37 | UK | |
| 38 | UK | |
| 39 | UK | |
| 40 | UK | |
| 41 | UK | |
| 42 | UK | |
| 43 | UK | |
| 44 | | |
| 45 | UK | |
| 46 | UK | Why are the people in 'power' hellbent on destroying us all. what good will come of it, perhaps freedom for the Earth? |
| 47 | UK | Why are the people in 'power' hellbent on destroying us all. what good will come of it, perhaps freedom for the Earth? |
| 48 | UK | Why are the people in 'power' hellbent on destroying us all. what good will come of it, perhaps freedom for the Earth? |
| 49 | UK | Why are the people in 'power' hellbent on destroying us all. what good will come of it, perhaps freedom for the Earth? |
| 50 | UK | Why are the people in 'power' hellbent on destroying us all. what good will come of it, perhaps freedom for the Earth? |
|
|
