Signatures 194 total
-
101
Name: Ed, Moira And Matilda Lukins on Jul 3, 2006Comments: It seems to me obvious that this decision is capable of review given that if anyone had botherd to consult (on this highly contentious issue) they would have found out that the local residents all oppose such a licence - we're in the heart of a family orientated area, not the West End.Flag
-
102
Name: Andy Goddard on Jul 3, 2006Comments: There is no point openning this club in the area, especially when so much work has been made to tidy the area and develop it, and to put a children's theatre in it, only to have this club bring the area's up-and-coming reputation down. No thanks!!!Flag
-
103
Name: Anna Robinson on Jul 3, 2006Comments:Flag
-
104
Name: John Pellowe on Jul 4, 2006Comments:Flag
-
105
Name: Helene Provstgaard on Jul 4, 2006Comments:Flag
-
106
Name: Rebecca Smith on Jul 4, 2006Comments: I strongly oppose the opening of this club and urge all other local residents to do the same. The idea of opening such an establishment in an area with a large population of children and tourists is absurd and will reverse the good work done in recent years to promote this as a desirable, safe, family-friendly area.Flag
-
107
Name: Anonymous on Jul 4, 2006Comments:Flag
-
108
Name: Joanna Chaplin on Jul 4, 2006Comments:Flag
-
109
Name: Anonymous on Jul 4, 2006Comments:Flag
-
110
Name: Anonymous on Jul 4, 2006Comments:Flag
-
111
Name: Anonymous on Jul 4, 2006Comments:Flag
-
112
Name: Anonymous on Jul 5, 2006Comments: Southwark Council should prove that people not sleaze come first in this boroughFlag
-
113
Name: Anonymous on Jul 5, 2006Comments: I am disgusted with southwark council for encouring this type of sleaze onto my doorstep. The city workers who can afford to pay these lapdancers for their jollys should have the club on the other side of the river, on their doorstep.Flag
-
114
Name: Karen O'Toole on Jul 5, 2006Comments: not here, not now, not anytime..no wayFlag
-
115
Name: Anonymous on Jul 5, 2006Comments:Flag
-
116
Name: Anonymous on Jul 5, 2006Comments:Flag
-
117
Name: Anonymous on Jul 10, 2006Comments:Flag
-
118
Name: Anonymous on Jul 10, 2006Comments: We strongly oppose the opening of such a club in this areaFlag
-
119
Name: John Thompson on Jul 10, 2006Comments:Flag
-
120
Name: C Whitehouse on Jul 10, 2006Comments:Flag
-
121
Name: Jason Ward on Jul 10, 2006Comments: Lap Dancing clubs should be allowed to go ahead. There is no reason that anyone should feel vulnerable from such a club, and since the insides of the premises will not be visible to those outside it will not be possible that children would be damaged or corrupted in anyway.Flag
-
122
Name: Carolyn Lucas on Jul 11, 2006Comments: This is a main tourist route for visitors & many attractions are geared towards children. This is an inappropriate location both for them & for the many families living on estaes nearby.Flag
-
123
Name: Zoe Strange on Jul 14, 2006Comments: We simply do not condone a lapdancing club in this, a family orientated, nieghborhood. There are many childern that are queued up outside the london dungeon on a daily basis which is right next door. HOW COULD THIS HAVE EVER EVEN BEEN CONSIDERED AS ACCEPTABLE Action needs to be taken to stop a sex business opening in such close proximity to attractions targeted at childern and families.Flag
-
124
Name: Rachel on Jul 17, 2006Comments:Flag
-
125
Name: Anonymous on Jul 19, 2006Comments:Flag
-
126
Name: J. Coombes on Jul 19, 2006Comments: this is obsolutely unacceptable to open a sex business so close to childerns attractions. This must be stoppedFlag
-
127
Name: J. Coombes on Jul 19, 2006Comments: this is obsolutely unacceptable to open a sex business so close to childerns attractions. This must be stoppedFlag
-
128
Name: J. Coombes on Jul 19, 2006Comments: this is obsolutely unacceptable to open a sex business so close to childerns attractions. This must be stoppedFlag
-
129
Name: J. Coombes on Jul 19, 2006Comments: this is obsolutely unacceptable to open a sex business so close to childerns attractions. This must be stoppedFlag
-
130
Name: J. Coombes on Jul 19, 2006Comments: this is obsolutely unacceptable to open a sex business so close to childerns attractions. This must be stoppedFlag
-
131
Name: J. Coombes on Jul 19, 2006Comments: this is obsolutely unacceptable to open a sex business so close to childerns attractions. This must be stoppedFlag
-
132
Name: J. Coombes on Jul 19, 2006Comments: this is obsolutely unacceptable to open a sex business so close to childerns attractions. This must be stoppedFlag
-
133
Name: J. Coombes on Jul 19, 2006Comments: this is obsolutely unacceptable to open a sex business so close to childerns attractions. This must be stoppedFlag
-
134
Name: J. Coombes on Jul 19, 2006Comments: this is obsolutely unacceptable to open a sex business so close to childerns attractions. This must be stoppedFlag
-
135
Name: J. Coombes on Jul 19, 2006Comments: this is obsolutely unacceptable to open a sex business so close to childerns attractions. This must be stoppedFlag
-
136
Name: Z Strange on Jul 19, 2006Comments: DISPICABLE!!!!!!!!Flag
-
137
Name: Z Strange on Jul 19, 2006Comments: DISPICABLE!!!!!!!!Flag
-
138
Name: Z Strange on Jul 19, 2006Comments: DISPICABLE!!!!!!!!Flag
-
139
Name: Z Strange on Jul 19, 2006Comments: DISPICABLE!!!!!!!!Flag
-
140
Name: Z Strange on Jul 19, 2006Comments: DISPICABLE!!!!!!!!Flag
-
141
Name: Z Strange on Jul 19, 2006Comments: DISPICABLE!!!!!!!!Flag
-
142
Name: Z Strange on Jul 19, 2006Comments: DISPICABLE!!!!!!!!Flag
-
143
Name: Z Strange on Jul 19, 2006Comments: DISPICABLE!!!!!!!!Flag
-
144
Name: Z Strange on Jul 19, 2006Comments: DISPICABLE!!!!!!!!Flag
-
145
Name: Z Strange on Jul 19, 2006Comments: DISPICABLE!!!!!!!!Flag
-
146
Name: Z Strange on Jul 19, 2006Comments: DISPICABLE!!!!!!!!Flag
-
147
Name: Z Strange on Jul 19, 2006Comments: DISPICABLE!!!!!!!!Flag
-
148
Name: Z Strange on Jul 19, 2006Comments: DISPICABLE!!!!!!!!Flag
-
149
Name: Anonymous on Jul 19, 2006Comments: DISPICABLE!!!!!!!!Flag
-
150
Name: Anonymous on Jul 19, 2006Comments: DISPICABLE!!!!!!!!Flag