Signatures 4766 total
- 1
- 2
- 3
-
4
Name: Lynn Avedisian on Mar 24, 2010Comments: There has to be a review by the EPA before any future decisions on Gas drilling are made! How could drilling NOT pose a threat to drinking water... LOOK AT THE RESEARCH FIRST!Flag
- 5
-
6
Name: Richard Evans on Mar 24, 2010Comments: There is no urgent need for more gas. U.S. capacity utilization is still low and unemployment is high. It's just common sense to delay until the EPA has completed its work.Flag
-
7
Name: Nettiejean Scarzafava on Mar 24, 2010Comments: Please allow the new EPA report a chance to give us more information on safe water before issuing final approval for fracture drilling.Flag
- 8
-
9
Name: Linda Corshen on Mar 24, 2010Comments: It is imperative that you delay pending this report. Ensuring the health and safety of the citizens of the state are reason enough. Please do the right thing.Flag
- 10
-
11
Name: Amy Harlib on Mar 24, 2010Comments: NO DRILLING IN THE MARCELLUS SHALE AND THE NY STATE WATERSHED EVER FOR ANY REASON!Flag
- 12
-
13
Name: Low, Stephanie on Mar 24, 2010Comments: Excellent initiative! DEC, please take note and follow the Precautionary Principle. Once it's broken, you (we) can't fix it.Flag
- 14
-
15
Name: Jonathan Kline on Mar 24, 2010Comments: there are too many unknowns in the hydrofracking process to move forward at this time. The EPA study should be completed before any further action is takenFlag
- 16
- 17
-
18
Name: Bonnie Chollet on Mar 24, 2010Comments: Wait for the EPA report to be done before making any decisions. Especially with your staff cuts to the DEC. There are not enough staff to properly provide safety in the "slick water" hydrofracking to keep our waters clean and safe!Flag
- 19
- 20
-
21
Name: Colleen Morris on Mar 24, 2010Comments: It is the right time to do the right thing. We have an opportunity and responsibility here to preserve and protect some of the most pristine water on the planet. Please, be brave; do not squander this moment.Flag
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
-
27
Name: Jonathan Raskin on Mar 24, 2010Comments: Is there really a compelling reason to proceed prior to the EPA's evaluation? The consequences are far too great to get this one wrong so please think it through. Thank youFlag
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
-
36
Name: Kevin Gref on Mar 24, 2010Comments: Please, as noted above, consider all the species that drink water and hold you responsible for potable water by awaiting the findings of the EPA prior to issuing the SGEIS.Flag
- 37
-
38
Name: Michal Shapiro on Mar 24, 2010Comments: Don't act in ignorance when it comes to drinking water!Flag
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
-
46
Name: H Graham on Mar 24, 2010Comments: As a recent transplant to Sullivan Country I am concerned that the DEC will get in front of an EPA study that is almost certain to be more researched and informative than the current one. Any repeal of DEC findings caused by the EPA report would only result in millions of tax dollars wasted on a review, when waiting will only harm eager drilling interests. The gas has been in the shale for a while; it can wait a bit longer.Flag
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50