Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 199 total

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4 »

  1. 101
    Name: Jake Marron on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments: You need to recognise that this is an essential benefit for those on lower incomes
    Flag
  2. 102
    Name: Eileen Meehan on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 103
    Name: Tommy Hanlon on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 104
    Name: JIM.COWAN on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 105
    Name: G O'Kane Unite on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 106
    Name: Andrew Cahalan on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments: In an economic environment of extreame pressure and competition, we need to keep young people in education for as long as possible to compete with qualifications and those with experience.
    Flag
  7. 107
    Name: Nuala Conlon on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 108
    Name: Nuala Conlon on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 109
    Name: John McMahon on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 110
    Name: Peter Mc Crea on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 111
    Name: Tommy Mcaree on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments: How are we supposed to educate our youth if we don't support them
    Flag
  12. 112
    Name: Vinny Barlow on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments: This is yet another disgrace. these children are our future but this short sighted sweeping measure will save little and the damage we will inflict will be so difficult to quantify. We ellect people we trust to run this country but now i feel for so many years to come we will reep what we have allowed to be sown. Take from those that can afford and let everyone see the fairness we have heard so much about but are yet to see!!!! We need to support our young people and come on it is hardly brinks-mat £30 a week?????
    Flag
  13. 113
    Name: Rhiannon Scott on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 114
    Name: DEREK PARTON on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments: I don't imagine this will impinge on MP's children !
    Flag
  15. 115
    Name: Gareth Scott on Feb 1, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 116
    Name: Brendan Houston on Feb 2, 2013
    Comments: Our country in the future will need Todays youth to be educated
    Flag
  17. 117
    Name: George Elliott on Feb 2, 2013
    Comments: cuts for bankers.
    Flag
  18. 118
    Name: Aileen Tester on Feb 2, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 119
    Name: Shane Ohara on Feb 2, 2013
    Comments: i dont think that it is fair at all for our EMA to be cut.
    Flag
  20. 120
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 2, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 121
    Name: Michelle Hayden on Feb 2, 2013
    Comments: In this time of major economic decline, high youth unemployment and when we are losing many of our most diadvantaged young people within the education system to cut EMA .... simply sends the message that we do not think the future of our economy, higher educational attainment for young people and the creation of a future skilled workforce is not worth the investment. And to a young person it sends a simple message ..... we do not think you are worth £30 a week as an investment!
    Flag
  22. 122
    Name: Anthony Mc Namee on Feb 2, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 123
    Name: Kevin Mcadam on Feb 2, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 124
    Name: Gail Young on Feb 2, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 125
    Name: Monica O Donnell on Feb 2, 2013
    Comments: youth worker with Derry youth teens for culture we oppose the cuts
    Flag
  26. 126
    Name: Emmet Thornton on Feb 3, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 127
    Name: Vanessa Brown on Feb 3, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 128
    Name: Iris Brown on Feb 3, 2013
    Comments: Forget about the rich, the low and middle class young people are striving to be well educated and are the future. Don't forget these young people shall bring us a better economy.
    Flag
  29. 129
    Name: Megan Lee on Feb 3, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 130
    Name: Hugh Mc Henry on Feb 3, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 131
    Name: Allan Rutherford on Feb 3, 2013
    Comments: I feel if the government remove this allowance more 16years old children will have to leave school. Given the amount of youth unemployment currently, the number s will force an increase in unemployable 16 - 18 year olds.
    Flag
  32. 132
    Name: Mark Hollinrake on Feb 3, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 133
    Name: Valerie Shields on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments: My children received EMA and it kept them both in school and going on to receive Degress, one in Business and other in Medicine. Children need a good start to life moving out into the world of employment.
    Flag
  34. 134
    Name: Julie Welsh on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 135
    Name: Jim Allen on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments: Recession a smokescreen for Tory elite to ring-fence best jobs and careers for their class by closing the door to higher education on working classes. They know that equitaible education creates a level playing field allowing for commoner accents in the corridors of power.
    Flag
  36. 136
    Name: Grainne Davis on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 137
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 138
    Name: Anne Elliott on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments: Scrapping EMA is really another way of denying education to so may young people especially those from working class backgrounds - is this what we want in the progressive 21st century?
    Flag
  39. 139
    Name: Bernadette McGuinness on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 140
    Name: Helen McAlister on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 141
    Name: Mary Jo McReynolds on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 142
    Name: Maura Campbell on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  43. 143
    Name: JohnT Roddy on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments: t Quote the song! its the rich have all the pleasure
    Flag
  44. 144
    Name: Suzanne Irwin on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 145
    Name: John Fox on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 146
    Name: Paula Mc Cartan on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 147
    Name: Sharon Bradley on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments: would disadvantage people who do not come from families who can support their education. Many parents are unemployed due to the ongoing recession.
    Flag
  48. 148
    Name: Patricia Burns on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 149
    Name: Annette Bradley on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  50. 150
    Name: John O'Neill on Feb 4, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4 »

Sponsored links