Signatures 50 total
Page: 1
-
1
Name: Michael Iacovacci on Jul 14, 2008Comments: This tower would be less than 1000' from my property.Flag
- 2
- 3
-
4
Name: Carol Rizza on Jul 15, 2008Comments: I do not want this cell tower. It would be in my backyard and very visible above the trees in both summer and winter. It is also not healthy for all of the school children that would be within 650 feet of the tower and would dramatically reduce property values for the homes that surround the tower.Flag
- 5
-
6
Name: Michael L. Spera on Jul 15, 2008Comments: Studies have shown increased negative health impacts for residents living within 1000 ft of these towers. My 3-year old niece and many other children live and go to school within 1000 ft of the proposed site. A residential property is within about 20 ft from the proposed site with a house and pool at a distance about the same as or less than the height of the tower! These are unacceptable impacts for residents of the area.Flag
- 7
-
8
Name: Charles And Ruth Snodgrass on Jul 16, 2008Comments: we are vehemently opposed to the CELL-TOWERFlag
- 9
- 10
-
11
Name: Chris And Di Qin on Jul 17, 2008Comments: We are totally against having a cell tower so close to our home. We have a right to oppose this tower where people own homes and rent.Flag
- 12
-
13
Name: Anonymous on Jul 18, 2008Comments: We are opposed to the cell tower, and do not want the harmful effects of living near the tower. This is a residential area with children, schools, churches. If residents cannot control the use of their own land, then it is time to fix the system.Flag
- 14
- 15
-
16
Name: Todd Gregor on Jul 18, 2008Comments: Absolutely NO WAY do we want this ugly structure in our neighborhood. There's no problem with cell service as it is and just think how it would bring down the property values!!!Flag
-
17
Name: Anonymous on Jul 18, 2008Comments: My husband and I are both doctors and we vehemently oppose this tower. The long-term effects, on both the body and the environment, are unknown. Let's not put profits over people!Flag
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
-
24
Name: Mark Vitarelli on Jul 18, 2008Comments: I've seen these put without thought to health consequences of the people living around them. I know people that live near one in upstate NY and constantly are experiencing migraines. I realize that the lease was in place before the current owners came into this deal, however, I ask the church to consider; not only will the proposed tower affect area families living around it, it will affect your parishioners also. Remember, this equipment is always on.Flag
- 25
- 26
-
27
Name: Michael Spera on Jul 19, 2008Comments: Michael Spera is the father of Mary Ann Strattner. He does not have own E-Mail address.Flag
-
28
Name: Anna Spera on Jul 19, 2008Comments: Anna Spera is mother of Mary Ann Strattner. Anna is also a Danbury, CT, resident. Anna does not have an E-Mail address.Flag
- 29
- 30
- 31
-
32
Name: Anonymous on Jul 20, 2008Comments: A cell tower has not been proven safe for our children or our community. No cell tower!!!Flag
-
33
Name: Anonymous on Jul 24, 2008Comments: I am more concerned about any health issues that may arise and willl not surface on individuals until it is too late. Please consider building the celltower away from homes and schools. Thank you.Flag
-
34
Name: David Pinckney on Jul 24, 2008Comments: Plain and simple, this tower is too close to peoples homes as well as Stadley Rough School. I understand that the church needs money to function, but putting up a cell tower is very selfish. The church should look at what is best for the greater good (as religion preaches) rather that what is best for their bottom line.Flag
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
-
39
Name: Anonymous on Aug 1, 2008Comments: My entire family opposes the cell tower. The area is too close to residential areas and a school. We do not approve of the construction of this tower.Flag
- 40
-
41
Name: Robert E. Richards on Aug 12, 2008Comments: Totaly against this so called "cell tower". \ 1 Royal Pine Drive Danbury, CT 06811Flag
-
42
Name: Renee DeMoss on Aug 19, 2008Comments: Cell towers should not be so irresponsibly placed. Commercial property should be sought after not residential areas...this will spoil the residential properties of the area.Flag
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
-
47
Name: Linda Nasser on Sep 5, 2008Comments: I am against the cell tower on Stadley Rough Road. A well established residential area is not the place for a tower, it will be harmful to the environment and will impact my property value negatively. It would be a negative factor in the quality of life in our neighborhoods in this areaFlag
- 48
- 49
- 50
Page: 1