Signatures 1288 total
Page: « ‹ 1, ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, ... 26 › »
-
251
Name: Thevenet on Mar 26, 2008Comments: too much confusion !Flag
-
252
Name: Andreas Glaesner on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
253
Name: Gerold Vincon on Mar 26, 2008Comments: No to Blended Malt Scotch Whisky ! Best regards GeroldFlag
-
254
Name: Simsy on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
255
Name: Peter Lading on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
256
Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
257
Name: Peter Mellin on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
258
Name: Nourney Julia on Mar 26, 2008Comments: The term "blenden malt" is a disgrace for the Whisky industry and will cause a decline of salesFlag
-
259
Name: Rune Jonsson on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
260
Name: Timmer on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
261
Name: Mats Ringstr on Mar 26, 2008Comments: Stupid....Flag
-
262
Name: Jordan Pohn on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
263
Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
264
Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
265
Name: Jan Sjogren on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
266
Name: Frank Bergmann on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
267
Name: GlenCoe on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
268
Name: Dennis Daughters on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
269
Name: Liu Jung Hua on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
270
Name: Lynne Stephen on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
271
Name: BEAUCAMP Pascal on Mar 26, 2008Comments: La situation n'est dFlag
-
272
Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
273
Name: Hubert Corman on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
274
Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
275
Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
276
Name: T.Thurlow on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
277
Name: Johan Van Samang on Mar 26, 2008Comments: I fully agree.Flag
-
278
Name: Sean Evans on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
279
Name: Steven Duchateau on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
280
Name: Ishbel Macleod on Mar 26, 2008Comments: This would destroy the perceived quality and authenticity of our fantastic national productFlag
-
281
Name: Ishbel Macleod on Mar 26, 2008Comments: This would destroy the perceived quality and authenticity of our fantastic national product.Flag
-
282
Name: Luca Chichizola on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
283
Name: Luca Chichizola on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
284
Name: Lionel Portal on Mar 26, 2008Comments: Very good alternative (from the MMs): "Malt scotch whisky" instead of "Blended Malt scotch whisky". "Grain scotch whisky" instead of "Blended Grain scotch whisky". ... and keep the word "blended" for the mixture of malt and grain.Flag
-
285
Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
286
Name: Charles MacLean on Mar 26, 2008Comments: Say no to 'Blended Malt/Blended Grain', because it is confusing. Say yes to simple 'malt' and 'grain' (for vatted products) and 'Single Malt/Grain' for single whiskies. Simple, and far less confusing.Flag
-
287
Name: Herke on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
288
Name: Thomas Kleinhenn on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
289
Name: Eva Sjogren on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
290
Name: Thomas Schubert on Mar 26, 2008Comments: www.potstill.deFlag
-
291
Name: John S. Davis on Mar 26, 2008Comments: Using the word blended clearly suggests the addition of other than malt whisky.Flag
-
292
Name: Lexus on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
293
Name: Jan Melchers on Mar 26, 2008Comments: Johannes, keep up the good work! Sweet dramsFlag
-
294
Name: P Fawcett on Mar 26, 2008Comments: As a retailer i strongly believe that using the term 'blended malt whisky' will only confuse the consumer,and thus detrimentally affect whisky sales.The current terms of 'vatted' and 'pure' malt whisky are clear and work well,please do not change them.Flag
-
295
Name: Ipparhos on Mar 26, 2008Comments: NO to "blended Malt"!!!Flag
-
296
Name: Hans-Henrik Hansen on Mar 26, 2008Comments: No Blended Malt Scotch Whisky!Flag
-
297
Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
298
Name: Johan Hofvander on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
299
Name: Michael Dereszynski on Mar 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
300
Name: Juergen Moeller on Mar 26, 2008Comments: I say NO to "Blended Malt Scotch Whisky"Flag