NO! to Blended Malt Scotch Whisky!

Signatures 1288 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, ... 26 › »

1. 201
   Name: Ragnhild S. Lervik on Mar 26, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 202
   Name: Peter Schreiner on Mar 26, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 203
   Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2008

   Comments: I thought it was a joke the first time I heard it but then a lot of what comes out of the SWA is quite funny...

   Flag
4. 204
   Name: Fischer Marcus on Mar 26, 2008

   Comments: I say NO ! to Blended Scotch Whisky. Care abbout consumers that they can also easily understand in the future what it mean, when spirit comes from one distillery, or one cask , or is blended in the known way.

   Flag
5. 205
   Name: Amund Arnesen on Mar 26, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 206
   Name: Arnvid Gunnar Lie on Mar 26, 2008

   Comments: Vatted malt is a better term!

   Flag
7. 207
   Name: Bjarne Rasmussen on Mar 26, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 208
   Name: Bob Buglass on Mar 26, 2008

   Comments: There is definately NO need for this change as the present discriptions are easily understood by the consumers.

   Flag
9. 209
   Name: Kolbein Svensson on Mar 26, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 210
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 211
    Name: Tim Armstrong on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: Thae curst horse-leeches o th' Excise, Wha mak the whisky stells their prize! Haud up thy han', Deil! ance, twice, thrice! There, seize the blinkers! An' bake them up in brunstane pies For poor damn'd drinkers. R.Burns.

    Flag
12. 212
    Name: Dominiek Bouckaert on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: Dear members of the SWA, Are you actually being paid to come up with this nonsense Kind regards, Dominiek

    Flag
13. 213
    Name: De Schulthess Patrick on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: Good idea this petition.

    Flag
14. 214
    Name: Henrik Isaksson on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 215
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 216
    Name: Leif Olav J on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: The Blended malts term introduces the potential confusion between vatted malts and blends. Vatted malt has been used for years and forcing bottlers to change into an IMO inferior label is a baaad idea.

    Flag
17. 217
    Name: Sebastian Rothammel on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 218
    Name: Kjell Ivar on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: I fully support this petition. Blended malt scotch whisky is a fully confusing term which would be highly problematic in the marketing of single malt whisky.

    Flag
19. 219
    Name: Katarzyna Sundblom on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 220
    Name: Chris Kent on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: I don't really understand what was wrong with "vatted malt". I just don't think using the same word to mean two different things is in anybody's best interest.

    Flag
21. 221
    Name: Dr Stephen F. Lunn on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: I can see no value in the introduction of the term 'blended malt whisky'. Blended whisky is known to be a mix of garin and malt whiskies, malt whisky is, by definition, the product of pot still distillation of malted barley only . A single malt is the product of a single pot still distillery. A vatted malt is a mix of the malt whiskes from more than one pot still distillery. This classification has been understood since blended whiskies were first introduced to the market over a hundred and fifty years ago and I can see no reason for changing the existing nomenclature. It is confusing and unnecessary and I am totally against it. I cannot imagine what the SWA is hoping to achieve by this proposed legislative change other than alienating the consumer. I have never been totally convinced as to what a 'pure malt' is supposed to be, and am reasonably happy that this term be dropped. I would hope that distilleries did not market 'impure malts' and therefore feel that this descriptive term is irrelevant.

    Flag
22. 222
    Name: Ethan Prater on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 223
    Name: Robert Lee on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: Yes,

    Flag
24. 224
    Name: Thomas Andersson on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 225
    Name: David Evans on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 226
    Name: Christian Habegger on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 227
    Name: Elaine Prowse on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: Why change a traditional classification that has been successfully in place for a long time with something that will cause nothing but confusion.

    Flag
28. 228
    Name: VAN INNIS FRANCOIS on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 229
    Name: Harry Lymburn on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: Get on with promoting the product instead of coming up with ways to confuse the consumer

    Flag
30. 230
    Name: Olli Karhu on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 231
    Name: Robert Ransom on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: Director of Sales & Marketing for Glenfarclas Single Highland Malt Scotch Whisky

    Flag
32. 232
    Name: Mark Schuetz on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: Its not broke. "No to blended malt scotch whisky"

    Flag
33. 233
    Name: Mark Schuetz on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: Its not broke. "No to blended malt scotch whisky"

    Flag
34. 234
    Name: Rauli Poikela on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: How about using just 'Malt Scotch Whisky' The word 'blended' suggests, well, blends. Which is why it would be so bad.

    Flag
35. 235
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: Absolutely "NOT" to blended malt scotch whisky.

    Flag
36. 236
    Name: Ernie Revilla on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: I say no to blended malt scotch whisky.

    Flag
37. 237
    Name: Arttu Taponen on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 238
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 239
    Name: RYAN on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 240
    Name: Tim Dacko on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 241
    Name: Ren on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: too confusing for whisky lovers and WE will never use the term either

    Flag
42. 242
    Name: J on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 243
    Name: David J Russo on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: Furthermore, do not use distillery names or references unless the liquid in the bottle is 100% a product of the named and/or referenced distillery(ies). Thank You!

    Flag
44. 244
    Name: Johnson on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 245
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 246
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: What justification is there to cause further confusion within the industry

    Flag
47. 247
    Name: Jean-Marie Putz on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: A simple denomination like : Single Malt Scotch Whisky Single Grain Scotch Whisky Malt Scotch Whisky Grain Scotch Whisky Blended Scotch Whisky would be much better, and much less confusing.

    Flag
48. 248
    Name: Ed Breese on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 249
    Name: Douglas Wood on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments: It is essential that blended malt does not ecome enshrined in law. Douglas Wood, Woodwinters Wines and Whiskies

    Flag
50. 250
    Name: David Sacks on Mar 26, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, ... 26 › »