NO! to Blended Malt Scotch Whisky!

Signatures 1288 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 › »

1. 1201
   Name: Andrew Fuller on Sep 1, 2008

   Comments: We need blended malt scotch whisky like a fish needs a bicycle

   Flag
2. 1202
   Name: Anders Jonasson on Sep 4, 2008

   Comments: The word blended should be kept for the traditional meaning only. It only confuses the customers if the same word is used in different contexts. The traditional use of the word "blended" has deep roots and our fear is that people looking for Malt Whisky will pass the labels using the word "blended" even if it is followed by the word "malt", because of old habits and unconscious behaviour. This would mean that the fine category of Vatted Malts will be sadly broken down. We don

   Flag
3. 1203
   Name: Hans L. Frederiksen on Sep 4, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 1204
   Name: Thomas Larsson on Sep 5, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 1205
   Name: Per De Vahl on Sep 5, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 1206
   Name: Per De Vahl on Sep 5, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 1207
   Name: Luc Wener on Sep 8, 2008

   Comments: SAY NO TO

   Flag
8. 1208
   Name: P on Sep 8, 2008

   Comments: And what would be wrong with the term "vatted malt whisky", which has been used for something like 150 years, to describe the type of product that is a mix of more than one malt whisky Continue using it and let the SWA admit they have gone wrong

   Flag
9. 1209
   Name: Paul Jarvis on Sep 8, 2008

   Comments: The premium "SINGLE MALT" designation is precious and priceless - the difference between "sparkling wine" and "Grand Marque Champagne". The designation "Blended malt Scotch Whisky" will confuse consumers and taint this premium, high-provenance, high added-value asset. It's why Ferrari don't make people-carriers.

   Flag
10. 1210
    Name: MIKE ROBINSON on Sep 10, 2008

    Comments: Good Luck

    Flag
11. 1211
    Name: Iain Davidson on Sep 10, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 1212
    Name: Mike Orrey on Sep 15, 2008

    Comments: As stated above, confusion in the consumers mind is exactly what we are trying to avoid. As one of the originators of the South African Whisky Live Festival, which within six years has become the largest whisky festival in the world, our mission has been to demistify the world of whisky. this proposal by the SWA will create more confusion for us.

    Flag
13. 1213
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 15, 2008

    Comments: redicelus

    Flag
14. 1214
    Name: Dave Bridge on Sep 17, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 1215
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 1216
    Name: Lognoul Marc on Sep 20, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 1217
    Name: Zerr on Sep 23, 2008

    Comments: it will confuse customers

    Flag
18. 1218
    Name: Dietmar Preuss on Sep 26, 2008

    Comments: please keep the term "blended" for the blend of grain and malt whiskies - only for this. The product of a marriage of only malt whiskies is a "vatted" or "pure" malt. Kindly regards D. Preuss

    Flag
19. 1219
    Name: Richard Ihringer on Oct 2, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 1220
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 5, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 1221
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2008

    Comments: A BLENDED MALT IS...... A BLEND!!!!!!END OF STORY

    Flag
22. 1222
    Name: I Do Not Consent To Tthis Form on Oct 11, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 1223
    Name: Marcel Niederhauser on Oct 11, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 1224
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 6, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 1225
    Name: Warren Barnes on Nov 6, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 1226
    Name: Ben Adams on Dec 4, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 1227
    Name: Khalid Essyad on Jan 21, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 1228
    Name: Cablan Khaled on Mar 6, 2009

    Comments: Things have been done the same for many, many years and they have worked. If their reason for changing the name to include the word "Blended" is for confusion purposes - then Im sorry, people are stupid. Its most certainly not a difficult concept to understand. Its a waste of time and money

    Flag
29. 1229
    Name: Tony on May 7, 2009

    Comments: NO! to Blended Malt Scotch Whisky!

    Flag
30. 1230
    Name: Irwin Fynn on Nov 1, 2009

    Comments: Keep the labeling as is.

    Flag
31. 1231
    Name: Stefanos Raftopoulos on Nov 20, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 1232
    Name: Manfred Wizsy on Feb 24, 2010

    Comments: As a president of a national Whisky Club I would like to stress that Blended Malt Scotch Whisky not only will confuse connoisseurs all over the world, but also open the doors to even more intransparent production steps and so finally will seriously damage the Whisky industrie

    Flag
33. 1233
    Name: Rkwplkwnrk on Mar 16, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 1234
    Name: Gfgqorq on Mar 16, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 1235
    Name: Pgwkwoffql on Mar 16, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 1236
    Name: Cheap Tetracycline on Mar 19, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 1237
    Name: Phentermine Smoke on Mar 20, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 1238
    Name: Valium on Mar 20, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 1239
    Name: Order Tamiflu on Mar 20, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 1240
    Name: Zithromax And Alcohol on Mar 20, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 1241
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 20, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 1242
    Name: Cheap Valtrex on Mar 20, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 1243
    Name: Generic Name For Adipex on Mar 20, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 1244
    Name: Buy Reductil on Mar 20, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 1245
    Name: Buy Reductil on Mar 20, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 1246
    Name: Tetracycline on Mar 20, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 1247
    Name: Zithromax on Mar 21, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 1248
    Name: Adipex on Mar 21, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 1249
    Name: Xenical Users Comments on Mar 21, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 1250
    Name: Reductil Dosage on Mar 21, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 › »