Powered by iPetitions - start your online petition now

 

Signatures | Total: 1,204

 

# NameComments
1151 Patrick Daems
1152 Aaron Krieger
1153 Andreas Mengel
1154 Ulrich Rose
1155 Gunnar Seiler
1156 IvanNice site chevrolet [URL=http://wtyryt.1gb.in/index.html]chevrolet[/URL]
1157 IvanNice site chevrolet [URL=http://wtyryt.1gb.in/index.html]chevrolet[/URL]
1158 S. BerryBad idea
1159 OLIVIER THIBAUT
1160 Martin Rouse
1161 Sean McKeeThe proposed terminology changes from the SWA are sheer idiocy. I truly hope that rational thought prevails in the SWA before the proposed changes are codified.
1162 David Markham
1163 Thomas E HudsonOne of the most positive aspects of single malt whiskies is that they embrace the differences in each distillery's formulae, time of year produced, etc., and NOT that someone is able to create the same (often boring) whisky time and time again. Anything that either directly or indirectly would harm the single malt distilleries or confuse consumers should not be tolerated. Indeed, confusing wording or wording in any "law" that might influence how able to be labeled, marketed or even discussed should not be allowed.
1164 Andy Havers
1165 Anonymous
1166 Steve Thom
1167 Anonymous
1168 Michael McLaren
1169 Oliver Chilton
1170 Martin Klimmek
1171 Doug CavenPlease preserve the unique Scots' tradition by leaving whisky labeling as is. Thank you.
1172 Michael Ponte
1173 Donald J. Clairmont
1174 David Mason
1175 Tegwyn Jonesin total agreement
1176 Ian Jones
1177 Gerold Vincon
1178 John Ward
1179 Rico Uhlig
1180 Andrew FullerWe need blended malt scotch whisky like a fish needs a bicycle
1181 Anders JonassonThe word blended should be kept for the traditional meaning only. It only confuses the customers if the same word is used in different contexts. The traditional use of the word "blended" has deep roots and our fear is that people looking for Malt Whisky will pass the labels using the word "blended" even if it is followed by the word "malt", because of old habits and unconscious behaviour. This would mean that the fine category of Vatted Malts will be sadly broken down. We don´t want to have confusion between products made from malt only and those that have been blended with grain whisky, and neither does the consumers. Anders Jonasson, Box Whisky - independent bottlers.
1182 Hans L. Frederiksen
1183 Thomas Larsson
1184 Per de Vahl
1185 Per de Vahl
1186 Luc WenerSAY NO TO ‘BLENDED MALT SCOTCH WHISKY!
1187 Pär CaldenbyAnd what would be wrong with the term "vatted malt whisky", which has been used for something like 150 years, to describe the type of product that is a mix of more than one malt whisky? Continue using it and let the SWA admit they have gone wrong
1188 paul jarvisThe premium "SINGLE MALT" designation is precious and priceless - the difference between "sparkling wine" and "Grand Marque Champagne". The designation "Blended malt Scotch Whisky" will confuse consumers and taint this premium, high-provenance, high added-value asset. It's why Ferrari don't make people-carriers.
1189 MIKE ROBINSONGood Luck
1190 Iain Davidson
1191 Mike OrreyAs stated above, confusion in the consumers mind is exactly what we are trying to avoid. As one of the originators of the South African Whisky Live Festival, which within six years has become the largest whisky festival in the world, our mission has been to demistify the world of whisky. this proposal by the SWA will create more confusion for us.
1192 Anonymousredicelus
1193 Dave Bridge
1194 Anonymous
1195 Lognoul Marc
1196 Zerrit will confuse customers
1197 Dietmar Preussplease keep the term "blended" for the blend of grain and malt whiskies - only for this. The product of a marriage of only malt whiskies is a "vatted" or "pure" malt. Kindly regards D. Preuss
1198 richard Ihringer
1199 Anonymous
1200 AnonymousA BLENDED MALT IS...... A BLEND!!!!!!END OF STORY

 

Signatures | Total: 1,204