| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 1051 | Franz Scheurer | We have a perfectly good and easily understandable category in Vatted Malts and do not need a confusing category called Blended Malts. It is designed to confuse, drive the prices down and water down the quality of Single Malts. NO! to Blended Malts! |
| 1052 | John Rozehnal | |
| 1053 | Greg Marks | |
| 1054 | Nick Christie | |
| 1055 | Gary Gracie | |
| 1056 | Anonymous | NO NO NO! |
| 1057 | Anonymous | Lets not spoil a good system |
| 1058 | Gregory Hudson | As chieftain of the Grand Central Malt Whisky Sept in Brisbane Australia part of my work is to educate drinkers regarding whisky or whiskey. Explaining that there is no defining whisky taste is often greated with amazement from the uneducated. This action will only serve to further confuse the buyer at the expense of the producer |
| 1059 | Amanda Gordon | |
| 1060 | Sam Simmonds | If the French can insist on 'champagne' meaning real champagne, scotch must also be clearly described |
| 1061 | Jamie Stutts | Why change the name now? Anyone who drinks a good single malt knows what a blend is, and knows what it means to drink a blended scotch. |
| 1062 | Richard A.clinger | Please do not confuss thoses unfamiliar with scotch by declaring all scotch 'blended scotch whiskey". |
| 1063 | Anonymous | |
| 1064 | Ben March-Prior | |
| 1065 | Sid Downie | Stupid idea.
Why destroy centuries of tradition?
Bet it was a young "modern" who thought of it. No soul! |
| 1066 | Kenneth MacColl | I think that to allow the description of Blended Malt for Scotch Whisky would be a retrograde step that would damage the image of Whisky and confuse less well informed customers.Over the past 30 years or so the image and profile of Single Malt Whisky marketed as the "chateau Brands" of the product have created a huge interest in whisky and I know from touring around Scotland of the appeal of the distilleries as part of the toiurist business.
There is, no doubt, a market for blends of malt like Islay Mist but these have to be marketed separately and distinctively otherwise the present difference between Blended Whisky and Malt Whisky will be
unclear. |
| 1067 | alan messini | If it ain't broke don't fix it!!!!
"vatted malt" is easy to understand
"blended malt" is just plain confusing
get off John Glaser's back - his whiskies are great!
get rid of caramel instead |
| 1068 | Fraser McRae | No Blended Malt, please! |
| 1069 | Philip Douglas | |
| 1070 | Samuel M. Komlenic | I know that this is a tough and highly contested subject, and I also realize that everyone on both sides of this issue has given a great deal of thought to the issue, but the word "blended" is just too common and disrespected to apply to whisky containing nothing but single malts. Let's go back to the drawing board and come up with a more respectful and descriptive term. Good luck to all! |
| 1071 | Peter Harper | blended malt Scotch whisky - means nothing to me. Please don'y change it for the sake of marketing. |
| 1072 | Hendrik Baumgart | it's confusing and it's bluring the boundaries even further (single, pure, blend) |
| 1073 | Peter Harper | Just say NO! |
| 1074 | Matthias Hand | |
| 1075 | Jane MacDuff | |
| 1076 | Anonymous | |
| 1077 | bry | |
| 1078 | Amit Sawhney | |
| 1079 | Graham Malcolm | This idea isn't doing the Scotch Whisky industry any favours. |
| 1080 | Iain MacDuff | New consumers may have trouble understanding why they should pay more for a blended malt when a blend has malt in it. |
| 1081 | Anonymous | |
| 1082 | Luke Bohanan | |
| 1083 | Ian Scott | To me this 'dumbing down' of labelling will result in a drop in demand and therefore quality will go down or prices go up for vatted malt whiskies. |
| 1084 | Colin Kenny-Levick | |
| 1085 | Dale Scott | |
| 1086 | Anonymous | |
| 1087 | wyckaert | SAY NO TO ‘BLENDED MALT SCOTCH WHISKY |
| 1088 | Megan Lewis | |
| 1089 | Fredrik Norrman | |
| 1090 | Anonymous | A definite no!!!!!! to blended malt scotch whiskey. |
| 1091 | Nick Ramsey | There is no reason to change the current terms which are perfectly clear.
Change to blended from vatted will imply cause confusion with what people already know as "blended".
Why do people have to tinker with things that work perfectly well? |
| 1092 | Anonymous | |
| 1093 | Mark Friedman | I think the descriptive terms as they exist are far clearer than any suggested terminology |
| 1094 | Gorm Jensen | |
| 1095 | Dirk Borgmann | |
| 1096 | Paul Fay | Basildon Malt Whisky Circle - This is a crazy idea! Why confuse the public and ruin a quality product and reputation? |
| 1097 | Bjørn Skauge | |
| 1098 | Anonymous | |
| 1099 | Anonymous | |
| 1100 | Andy Havers | |