| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 1001 | Anonymous | Stop consumer confusion |
| 1002 | Tim Errock | |
| 1003 | Jens Myretyr | No, I mean no! Keep it as it always has been! |
| 1004 | Matthew Chivian | |
| 1005 | Sean Mitchell | |
| 1006 | H. Juergen W. Schott | Nothing to be added to the above said arguments.
I say No to blended malt.
NB.
I personally collect single malts only!!! |
| 1007 | Ronald Zwartepoorte | Just say no to BLENDED Malt |
| 1008 | Richard A. Clinger | |
| 1009 | Kyle Miller | |
| 1010 | G Ogden | |
| 1011 | John Lamond | The term "blended malt" has no history. The SWA, in attempting to clarify things in the mind of the consumer, will only serve to confuse the consumer further. |
| 1012 | Brian Kelly | There's nothing like a group of so called 'experts' (SWA) to cause confusion and mayhem. Common sense should prevail and the majority (consumer) voice listened to - NO TO BLENDED MALT! The industry will have a hard enough time in the economic gloom ahead without adding to the confusion. |
| 1013 | Anonymous | |
| 1014 | Jens Steinert | |
| 1015 | Dirk Pittelkow | I SAY NO TO ‘BLENDED MALT` SCOTCH WHISKY!!!! |
| 1016 | Jon Beach | What exactly was wrong with "Vatted" Malt? |
| 1017 | Andrew Thomas | Say NO |
| 1018 | Duncan Elphick | What is wrong with the term 'Vatted Malt' ? |
| 1019 | dan lurinsky | no to blended malt scotch whisky! |
| 1020 | Andrew Nicolson | A big "NO!" to Blended Malt Scotch Whisky from me too! |
| 1021 | Takeshi Mogi | The “Blended Malt” category is strange and confusing. It is imposible for me to accept it. |
| 1022 | Jens Tholstrup | |
| 1023 | Peter Schwarz | |
| 1024 | David Smith | |
| 1025 | Christian Loan | |
| 1026 | Michael Tretter | |
| 1027 | Peter Marcus | You folks at the SWA are running head long to make a muddle of the traditional current descriptive language and terminology. For heavens sake, sit your bums down, put you hands in your laps and stop making a mess of things. You'll still be paid. |
| 1028 | Kenneth Shaw | Why change it when its not broken!! |
| 1029 | Anonymous | Why confuse the consumer more? |
| 1030 | Anonymous | Working in a Scotch Whiky Importer in Japan, I just cannot accept the expression of BLENDED MALT as it is too ugly. The words of Scotch Whisky should stay beautiful to represent its historial background and passion of all the people who have been spending thier lives for Scotch Whisky. I caanot feel anything from BLENDED MALT. It doesn't come to me. |
| 1031 | Anonymous | we are finally winning customers to single malt wkisky and you wan't to give the producers a chance to muddy the waters . The cynic in me says this is all about raising revenues. |
| 1032 | Motoko Kuramochi | |
| 1033 | Lars Jönsson | |
| 1034 | Lorna Castle | Not nearly such a impressive name and could cause confusion. |
| 1035 | Anonymous | |
| 1036 | OSAMU ＫＵＲＡＭＯＣＨＩ | |
| 1037 | Andrew Derbidge | |
| 1038 | Bruce Ferrier | Just DON'T do this - get real guys...it's hard enough to get the 'average Joe' aware of what the various scotch whiskies are as is, without throwing this in to the ring!!F
Bruce ferrier |
| 1039 | Anonymous | The term 'Blended Malt Scotch Whisky' is an unnecessary addition to the whisky lexicon and will create even further confusion in the minds of a largely ill-informed public. Please do not encourage the use of this expression. |
| 1040 | Anonymous | do not mess about with the malt we dont want blended malt whisky |
| 1041 | Stuart Ritchie | What are you thinking. This is surely some attempt to strike back at the re-institution of the Scots individuality and parliament after 600 years in the wilderness.
In all seriousness, leave well enough alone.
Regards.
Stuart Ritchie. |
| 1042 | Ross Anderson | |
| 1043 | Anonymous | |
| 1044 | Anthony David Chapman | Vatted Malt works OK. If it isn't broken, don't try to fix it! |
| 1045 | David Oliver | NO to "Blended Malt Scotch Whisky" call a spade a spade |
| 1046 | Des Mulcahy | Blended Malt Scotch Whisky! An oxymoron created by marketers who are treating whisky drinkers as morons. |
| 1047 | Martyn Jenkins | |
| 1048 | Ian Besch | |
| 1049 | Anonymous | |
| 1050 | Richard Bradley | The SWA claims Glen Breton is confusing. but this is even more confusing |