| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 1 | John Glaser | |
| 2 | Teresa Pabst | |
| 3 | Thomas Sundblom | Don't change the tradition. Keep the old and very good term "Vatted Malt".
Thomas
Whisky importer, Sweden |
| 4 | Jenz | |
| 5 | P-M Odsäter | SAY NO TO ‘BLENDED MALT SCOTCH WHISKY! |
| 6 | Peter Sundlöf | |
| 7 | Daniel Nilsson | |
| 8 | Bo Kilaker | |
| 9 | Christer Sundberg | No to blended malt scotch whisky |
| 10 | göran berglund | |
| 11 | Andreas Borg | |
| 12 | Anonymous | |
| 13 | Pär Högberg | |
| 14 | Rob C. Stevens | the most of my customers would not understand the therm "blended malt whisky". this is really confusing. it blends their brains, not the malt!
“I SAY NO TO ‘BLENDED MALT SCOTCH WHISKY!’” |
| 15 | Marcus Gustafsson | |
| 16 | Anonymous | |
| 17 | jimmy sjölander | |
| 18 | Anonymous | |
| 19 | Anonymous | |
| 20 | Serge at Whiskyfun & Malt Maniacs | Keep it Simple and Short!
(and, most of all, avoid confusion) |
| 21 | Michel van Meersbergen | |
| 22 | Alex Bruce | Much simpler to refer to vatted malts as simply "Malt Whisky". |
| 23 | Ulf Brömster | |
| 24 | Mike Drury | Vatted and Pure are known meanings to hundreds and thousands of non English Speakers as is Blended - How with an international product can it be expected to re-inform/educate these people who also unerstand the real meaning of "Blended" is attached only to the marrying of Malt and Grain alcohol. |
| 25 | Ralf Lovefors | NO WAY !! |
| 26 | Dick de Jong | We, the undersigned of this petition, being comprised of Scotch whisky consumers and industry & trade members, ask DEFRA to remove the “blended malt Scotch whisky” section of the proposed legislation because it is bad for Scotch whisky.
Me, as consumer, ask the same.
Sixty Dick. |
| 27 | luc timmermans | |
| 28 | Ronny | |
| 29 | Lasse Holm | |
| 30 | Gunnar Nilsson | |
| 31 | Maarten van Breemen | |
| 32 | Rainbow | |
| 33 | Bengt-Åke Olsson | |
| 34 | Per Andersson | Just don't, please. |
| 35 | Lex Kraaijeveld | Use of the term 'blended' in relation to malt whisky will only have the effect of confusing customers. Personally, I lost count of how many times I have had to explain that the word 'blended' means something different depending on the context it is being used in. Why confuse customers and damage the image of Scottish whisky? |
| 36 | Anonymous | |
| 37 | Jeff Pabst | |
| 38 | Robert Karlsson | |
| 39 | Anonymous | |
| 40 | Christer Bergwall | |
| 41 | teun van wel | tottaly agree. Will only make matters much worse. in the perception of most consumers there's malt whisky and there's blended whisky. Period!
wo sperate categories. Please leave it taht way. |
| 42 | Ulf Buxrud | I support the standpoint that the following defintions should be the only ones used to
define Scotch whisky categories.
Malt Whisky
Single Malt Whisky
Grain Whisky
Single Grain Whisky
Blended Whisky |
| 43 | Anonymous | |
| 44 | Dan T. Englehardt | This is a very bad idea for both the consumer and the industry. I hope it is not put into law. |
| 45 | Anonymous | |
| 46 | Anonymous | No Blended Malt Scotch Whisky! |
| 47 | Kingfisher | |
| 48 | Oskar Törnqvist | |
| 49 | Chris Edmunds | Wake up and small the bespoke product! |
| 50 | Mikael Weisz | NO TO ‘BLENDED MALT SCOTCH WHISKY! |