| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 101 | amy o'brien | congection charge is way out of line we have to drive o work, and go shopping. buisnesses will suffer. just for ken to have extra money. we pay enough tax |
| 102 | Vicky Foreman | |
| 103 | Peter Lucas | I oppose all congestion charging. |
| 104 | Alexander Ryland | |
| 105 | Anonymous | |
| 106 | Anonymous | |
| 107 | SUE LIEBTHAL | I strongley object to this, it would cost me more to work and shop. Bromley would loose lost of customers to Bluewater shopping Centre. This would effect Businesses as if we haven't enough taxes to pay out. |
| 108 | Nigel Hosking | |
| 109 | Wendy Walker | Congestion charge was only meant for London
Soon, we won't be able to go anywhere without paying which will have a knock on effect to business and the economy. I think this is disgusting and greedy. Lets vote Ken OUT. |
| 110 | PATRICIA SAWYER | |
| 111 | Tanya Louise White | I am a student, and when I come home I cannot afford to pay anything extra on top of rent, etc. Where I live in the borough of Bromley, congestion does not appear to be a problem, and the charge would be introduced for no apparent reason. I understand the need for increased attention to the environment, hence the new efforts with recycling and cutting down on CO2 emissions in other manners. However, my car is one of the only ways to get around locally, as the two bus routes nearest me (R2 and R3) are not reliable enough and journeys on buses are no cheaper than paying a congestion charge. It seems I am incurring unnecessary expense on both counts. |
| 112 | siobhan boulton | |
| 113 | Anonymous | this is ridiculous, i live in bromley and there is hardly any congestion!! how can livingstone put a charge here when those that dont want to pay the london congestion charge are getting trains from bromley south, a pretty damn major station as far as london transport is concerned! |
| 114 | Simon Grimmond | |
| 115 | Kirsty Grimmond | We pay enough already in taxes and unless a substantial amount of investment is going to be made in the local public transport infrastructure, this is a very unacceptable plan indeed. |
| 116 | Celia Tucker | |
| 117 | Shelley | |
| 118 | Shelley Fey | What a joke |
| 119 | francis charlesworth | |
| 120 | Hannah Harvey | |
| 121 | Priscilla Phillips | |
| 122 | Thomas Harper | Wouldnt be such a problem if there was tube link near by but the fact we can't use our oysters to get into central would mean we'd get finacially raped |
| 123 | Liam Johnson | I think that placing the congestion charge on Bromley is totally un-nessacary!
You raised tax in Bromley already with "Chatterton Village", now why give us yet ANOTHER charge for living where we do??? |
| 124 | Anonymous | |
| 125 | Danielle Kinner | |
| 126 | Sinead O'Donovan | |
| 127 | Ria Safey | |
| 128 | Anonymous | |
| 129 | Ann Horton | |
| 130 | Amy | |
| 131 | Anonymous | |
| 132 | Jenna Voyce | |
| 133 | Faion Bentley | No to congestion charging in Bromley instead concentrate on improving local public transport systems and local amenities |
| 134 | Sana Sadiq | the cost of living is already high enough without this extra imposed taxation method.
the congestion in bromley has not reached such a level that bringing in a charge would benefit anyone. |
| 135 | Anonymous | outragious, isnt any where safe from this money grabing scheme |
| 136 | Anonymous | Just another way to rinse the people of money eh Labour you sligh dog |
| 137 | Katherine Lymer | |
| 138 | Anonymous | How about promoting car clubs rather than just implementing a system that clearly hasn't worked in Central London |
| 139 | Darren Carter | The only reason he wants to include Bromley is to make money. There is no real congestion in Bromley. |
| 140 | Danielle Eaton | |
| 141 | Mark Brock | |
| 142 | Jack Connolly | |
| 143 | Kim Ovard | |
| 144 | Matthew Percival | |
| 145 | Katerina Armenakis | |
| 146 | Anonymous | utterly stupid, money making schemes, supose its alright for them because they get stupidly over paid why the rest of us are working our butts off to keep food on the table and a roof over our heads!
Ken Livingston needs to get a hobby to occupy his time! |
| 147 | Mark Allen | I am planning on starting up a family run business with my mother. This business will be of great interest to the elder community of our area. A part of our business will involve picking up and dropping off our less able customers on special days at no charge. People who cant leave their own homes. So we can give them a special day! These extra costs are going to have a severe impact on the costs of the business and ultimately could lead to its demise. So these same people would have to make their own way in or just stay confined in their own homes! People for which we wouldn't be here today. Why would you want to introduce a tax (Thats what it is) on bringing the local community, young and old together!! Im astonished. Mark Allen , Beckenham. 32 |
| 148 | Ian Ansell | |
| 149 | Joe Graver | |
| 150 | Anonymous | |