| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 1 | James Cleverly | |
| 2 | James Dullaway | |
| 3 | James Mills | This is stupid, you cannot go anywhere without getting taxed or anything!!! |
| 4 | Anonymous | |
| 5 | Jo Wilcox | |
| 6 | Katie Killick | |
| 7 | Sarah Armstrong | Why would you want to bring in the congestion charge in for bromley when its about an hours drive from bromley? |
| 8 | SARAH CRACKNELL | |
| 9 | Chloe Walsh | |
| 10 | Katie Bassett | |
| 11 | Michael Keeler | Another example of Red Ken refusing to listen to the people. Hopefully a new face will be in the town hall come the middle of May! |
| 12 | Anonymous | I have a part-time job in Bromley and there is only one bus route which runs from near my house. It is a ten minute walk to the bus stop and this bus only comes every hour. It does not run on Sundays. This leaves me with no choice but to drive to work and park in the car park. I already have to pay a substantial amount to park at work and I strongly object to having to pay the congestion charge every time I drive to work. I might as well take a pay cut. Why can't the money the car park make from everyone who is forced to park there be used to help the environment? The congestion charge in Bromley will not be an effective way of reducing the amount of traffic there, just an effective way of making the government more money which they will continue to use for matters which ignore our best interests (for example sending our taxpayer's money abroad for child support when our own system is such a shambles). Perhaps the governement should concentrate on bringing in legislation to encourage car companies to produce 'greener' cars, rather than punishing the general public for polluting the environment. For some people it is necessary to drive and, after all, we are only using what has been rigorously sold to us! |
| 13 | Michael Byrne | |
| 14 | Michael Kokborg Kni | This country is going down the drain! |
| 15 | Alissa Mears | |
| 16 | Becky Grimes | |
| 17 | Rebecca Stevens | |
| 18 | Lucy Bishop | |
| 19 | Hermione Woodgate | |
| 20 | Richard Anstead | |
| 21 | Bethany Gibbs | |
| 22 | Ellerie Jones | |
| 23 | Anonymous | |
| 24 | Sarah Hay | As a young home owner, it is already a struggle for me to keep up with mortgage payments, council tax, rising fuel costs and road tax. I work in Bromley and the congestion charge would mean that I can no longer afford to drive into work.
With no bus routes near me that offer a quick route into Bromley I will be faced with the prospect of my usual 15 minute journey turning into an hour. It seems that it is yet another way for the labour government to make more money from us, while disguising it as a 'green' policy. |
| 25 | Jane Auger | |
| 26 | Sarah McPartlan | I am a student who uses public transport every day to get to London however I have a car, and paying for congestion charge on top of my annual travel card would hit me hard. The people it would effect are people like myself rather than the wealthy who rarely use public transport. |
| 27 | Matt Beadle | |
| 28 | Louisa Weeks | |
| 29 | Chaz Swann | |
| 30 | Amy Stapeton | |
| 31 | Sarah Beadle | BROMLEY IS NOT CONGESTED; the only reason why Bromley would have become more congested is because of the existing congestion charge, so persons that would normally travel into the existing zone are avoiding to do so because of the cost; which is unjustified. The goverment borrowed £49bn and only £37bn is put back into public services. £12bn difference; not exactly pocket change is it, maybe just maybe the only cut back the goverment needs to administer is on their wages, you should be payed national average, to prove that what they do is for the people of GB, for the greater good, not just for themselves! |
| 32 | Claire Blakemore | If this congestion charge is approved I believe local businesses will loose out particularly shops as people will head t out of town where not only the parking is free, the roads are free to use too. |
| 33 | Emily Bailey | A little note for Ken and his cronies:
Without first replacing the non-existent buses with adequate public transport covering ALL areas of bromley and at reasonable prices (It is MUCH easier to drive to work in Bromley than it is to wait 30mins for a bus that doesn't come, is packed with loud school kids, crawls into town at an incredibly slow pace and costs me over £2 for the privilidge- ridiculous), people will not be able to get to work in Bromley. You are helping no one except yourself. It is expensive enough for us to live as it is. Our business already shares cars due to the increase in petrol prices, as we can't afford to run our cars anymore. Are you trying to stop us from getting to work completely?! I assume you wish to impoverish those getting by, by increasing our living prices to ridiculous amounts and making getting to work and earning money more difficult. Just to make you rich Mr Livingstone even richer. Greed. |
| 34 | Michael Andrew | |
| 35 | Rachel Lucking | |
| 36 | Annie Savage | |
| 37 | Anonymous | |
| 38 | Edward Ash | |
| 39 | Shelley O'Halloran | Ken livingstone is a nightmare...get rid of him I say! |
| 40 | olivia goldsmith | |
| 41 | Gulizar Abdurrahman | |
| 42 | Eleanor Botell | Bromley is underfunded by the Government, given very little of the benefits of being in London, why should we have the disadvantages only!?
We already have to pay so much more for transport into London, I can't afford to pay even more to drive as well! |
| 43 | nick blakemore | This is just another tax to fill Kens coffers. He promised to improve the transport structure when he was made mayor. I for one have seen limited improvement in both the City and in Bromley.
All this charge will do, is make it even more costly for the elderly to drive. They can't use busses, because they are infrequent, and little has been done to improve safety on the buses, with assaults rising at an alarming rate. |
| 44 | David Vincent | |
| 45 | Peter Marshall | |
| 46 | victoria grech | |
| 47 | Sally | |
| 48 | Daniel Emmett-Gulliver | |
| 49 | Andy Lane | |
| 50 | Karen Naylor | With most of Bromley high street not accessable to cars anyway, dont you think there are already enough restrictions in place without adding a congestion charge. I think the Goverment get more than enough from drivers in the respect of the stupid amounts charges for parking without stinging us for anymore.
It doen't make sence that you are trying to reduce the local traffic, but have given/ are going to give permission for a Tesco to open in Homesdale road which is already a busy road. A Tesco would add more traffic, noise and general disruption to the envirmoment - which "apparently" is what your trying to stop!! I |