NO to Blended Plan

Signatures 197 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4 › »

1. 51
   Name: Blake Auchmoody on Dec 2, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 52
   Name: Kelly Auchmoody on Dec 2, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 53
   Name: Andrea Komulainen on Dec 2, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 54
   Name: John Speich on Dec 2, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 55
   Name: Kristin Jacobs on Dec 2, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 56
   Name: Niki Hudson on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 57
   Name: Andy Hays on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 58
   Name: Susan Mangin on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments: I concur with everything communicated above and strongly object to the Blended Plan.

   Flag
9. 59
   Name: Christopher Mangin Jr. on Dec 3, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 60
    Name: Lori Ann Dix on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: Equality in education, bridge the gap.

    Flag
11. 61
    Name: Monica Budzinski on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 62
    Name: Kelly Auchmoody on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 63
    Name: Camille Dean on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: As a resident of Crown Grant I oppose the blended plan and support Option 1 or 2.

    Flag
14. 64
    Name: Laura Jarrett on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: Homeowner - 11508 Bell Tower Court

    Flag
15. 65
    Name: Raymond Hahn on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: The blended option is no option! No school should be over capacity when.

    Flag
16. 66
    Name: Kristina Barbier on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 67
    Name: Alexandra Randazzo on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 68
    Name: Stephen Roberts on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: I am adamantly opposed to the blended plan.

    Flag
19. 69
    Name: Hilary Coakley on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: I support option 1 or 2- not the blended plan.

    Flag
20. 70
    Name: Mark Jarrett on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 71
    Name: T. Borden Ellis on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 72
    Name: Jennifer Eakes on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 73
    Name: Mary Rosenberg on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: NO to blended option!

    Flag
24. 74
    Name: Maureen Vogt on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: Please be consider the impacts discussed in this petition.

    Flag
25. 75
    Name: Michael Vogt on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 76
    Name: Stanley Magrill on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 77
    Name: Steve Nunn on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 78
    Name: Leslie Cole on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: I don't support the blended plan. Pocahontas Middle School is just over 1 mile and it's too difficult a time to separate these kids from their peers and bus them to a school 5 miles away.

    Flag
29. 79
    Name: Todd Andrews on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 80
    Name: Whitney Berriman on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 81
    Name: Ray Ferguson on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: I am a realtor that is from this area. People that are moving into this area are very concerned about this blended option. I have moved over 150 families into our area from other states. A school that is overcrowded for even one day will alter their buying decision.

    Flag
32. 82
    Name: James Kennedy on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: Any plan that puts a school over capacity from day one cannot be considered a plan.

    Flag
33. 83
    Name: Julia Gore on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 84
    Name: Kim Goodwyn on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: I fully support Option 2 as currently proposed. Please maintain middle school feeder for areas south of Church Road and east of Pump Road to Pocahontas Middle School as these students were moved there just 2 years ago. Thank you.

    Flag
35. 85
    Name: Brenda Craig on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: As a Bell Tower resident, I vote NO to Blended Plan - YES to Supporing only Option 1 or 2

    Flag
36. 86
    Name: Suzanne Pittman on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: This blended proposal is unfair to the children. Please consider options 1 or 2.

    Flag
37. 87
    Name: Brian Pittman on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 88
    Name: Stephen Harper on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 89
    Name: Carey And Tamara Parker on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 90
    Name: Jane Dufrane on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 91
    Name: Benjamin W. Smith on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: The Blended Plan is bad for Gayton Elementary and bad for Henrico County School System. I Support Option 1 or Option 2.

    Flag
42. 92
    Name: Alena Henderson on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: We didn't like the byrd/pocahontas rule before - that's why it was changed. Let's not bring it back.

    Flag
43. 93
    Name: Kathleen Richine on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: this new plan doesn't make sense, surely there must be another way

    Flag
44. 94
    Name: Kathy Hubley on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: I oppose the blended plan!

    Flag
45. 95
    Name: Martha Shippee on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: Every parent I know supports plan 1, but it seems this new plan has been put together by the board in total disregard for the hard work of the committee and intense parent involvement. I hope their desire for community involvement has not just been for show.

    Flag
46. 96
    Name: Robert Wilhelm on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: Subjectively using roads as a divider for schools is not a legitimate reason to be moving children around and causing such upheaval. Any reasonable person would understand that!

    Flag
47. 97
    Name: Lauren Rosenbaum on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 98
    Name: Bob Shippee on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: This option is worse than option 2 and much, much worse than option 1.

    Flag
49. 99
    Name: Amy Martin on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: I do not support overcrowding Gayton Elementary School when a new elementary school

    Flag
50. 100
    Name: Ruth Pickett on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4 › »