NO to Blended Plan

Signatures 197 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4 › »

1. 1
   Name: Evan Magrill on Dec 1, 2012

   Comments: NO to blended plan.

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Kimberlee Magrill on Dec 1, 2012

   Comments: NO to "Blended Plan"

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Robin Salzberg on Dec 1, 2012

   Comments: please send the lake Loreine children to short pump elementary and Pocahontas middle

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: K. B. Basseches on Dec 1, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Amy Wallace on Dec 1, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: David Acree on Dec 1, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Melanie Campbell on Dec 1, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Dean Meyer on Dec 1, 2012

   Comments: When you purchase a home in a certain community a big part of that decision process is taking into consideration the schools your children will be going to. The school boards ability to modify infringes on your rights and ability to help choose how your child is educated.

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Lisa Poore on Dec 1, 2012

   Comments: This is a vulnerable time in a child's life and they should be able to have the stability of attending the same school as their friends.

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: David Nunn on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: The Blended plan does not address the county's goal to provide membership relief for elementary schools in the area with forecasted membership at 100% of capacity or higher. This plan creates an overcrowded situation for 4 years (per county's projections) at Gayton ES.

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Jeff And Carolyn Cutright on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: I do not support the blended plan

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Tera Fleming on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: This option breaks up current neighborhood communities along the Church Road corridor and sends smaller neighborhoods to a middle school that is farther away and not part of the Short Pump community. We do NOT support this plan!

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Robin Pfeffer on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Andrea Stinnette on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Khudsia Hyder on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Haroon Hyder on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Margaret Vint on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: It is upsetting to think that after a 3+ mile bus ride children, that went to Carver, will be driving past our home on their way to Pocahontas... and my children will be driving nearly 6 miles to Byrd. Pocahontas is just over a mile from our house. On top of that, they will be dumped into a school without the majority of the peers they have grown up with... I don't see how the blended plan makes sense financially for the HCPS (shipping children all over the county) and it's certainly not what it best for our children's academic success.

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Meredith Edison-Billiet on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Phyllis Magrill on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: This plan came out of nowhere. What happened to the other 6 plans that were be considered that would keep neighborhoods together?

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Kelly Bain on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Scott Bain on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Julia Gore on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: I am in support of plan 1 or 2, not the blended plan due to over capacity at Gayton which will reduce the learning levels of the children at the school, not enough available classrooms, and most likely the p

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Chrissy Cuyle Nemeyer on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Lee West on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Kimberly Clary on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: The blended option overcrowds Gayton. Options 1 and 2 do not overcrowd any school. There is no need to create a problem when you have two options that are not detrimental to any of the schools.

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Todd Clary on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: The blended option would put my child at a great disadvantage. Options 1 and 2 do not put any school at a disadvantage.

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Meredith Stockman on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Kathryn Josefiak on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Renee Chandler on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: W. Todd Tuting on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: the blended plan will destroy the quality of education Gayton has offered for so many years.

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Mike Morris on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Lori Hedrick on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Vincent Randazzo on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Dustin Love on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Kirsten Weeks on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Beth Grose on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Michelle Kovacs on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Mac And Beth Stuckey on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Laura Schmidt on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Amber Ryan on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Denise Leonard on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: Please keep Bell Tower under Option 1 or 2.

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Chris Dawson on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: 110% capacity? Ridiculous proposition...

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Paul Upton on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Jennifer Harper on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Pam Speich on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: I oppose the blended plan. It goes against the stated goal of redistricting, which is to prevent elementary schools from exceeding 100% capacity.  

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Cristy Glagola on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: I oppose the blended option!!!

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Mike Glagola on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: I oppose the blended option.

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Jennifer Hays on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Blake Auchmoody on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4 › »