Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 193 total

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4 »

  1. 101
    Name: Sonja Kylma on Nov 23, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I don't know
    Flag
  2. 102
    Name: Nicola Smith on Nov 23, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  3. 103
    Name: John Shaw on Nov 23, 2012
    Comments: Health Issues, Noise pollution, Property Values decreasing, Inadequate infrastructure all on COSS land which should be turned into recreational facilties for the community, not a recycling facility in a residential area. Common sense needs to prevail Council, do the right thing.
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  4. 104
    Name: Chris Botfield on Nov 23, 2012
    Comments: as a resident of Springfield, I am disgusted at councils' attitude towards the residents.
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  5. 105
    Name: Mary on Nov 23, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?:
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I agree
    Flag
  6. 106
    Name: Louise Flood on Nov 23, 2012
    Comments: This is not economical nor appropriate for a residential area. There are better sites already available. The cost of a road upgrade alone must make this unviable.
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  7. 107
    Name: Yvonne Naftel on Nov 23, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  8. 108
    Name: Yvonne Naftel on Nov 23, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  9. 109
    Name: Louise Hargreaves on Nov 23, 2012
    Comments: This is disgusting, would the council staff like to live with a quarry in their back yard and breath the level of air pollution we will be subjected to.
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I agree
    Flag
  10. 110
    Name: Tamzyn Dorfling on Nov 23, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  11. 111
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 24, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  12. 112
    Name: Jann Hayman on Nov 24, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  13. 113
    Name: Teya Doyle on Nov 24, 2012
    Comments: This is bad idea with the school near by the extra truck traffic, dust and many other nagative thing this will bring to our atea.. Im sure thete is a less poultated and more suited place to put this.. ...
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I don't know
    Flag
  14. 114
    Name: Jarod Hamilton on Nov 24, 2012
    Comments: “The purchase of THIS land will complete an existing gap in the COSS area & is strategically significantly”, “Director of Works investigate the POSSIBILITY of Council utilising the site in the SHORT TERM”,”…then remediate”, “...funds allocated from COSS Trust Fund for the acquisition”. It was recommended $850 000 be used to purchase land from a trust fund that is for recreational public usage, environmental & wildlife protection etc and that the quarry section be remediated. What happened? Current zoning prohibits the area usage as a Resource Recovery Facility, why has concrete crushing already been happening in this location? Is the concrete dust piles stored correctly? Your development plan identifies benefits to the council such as central location, cost savings, meeting State environmental/recycling targets etc. I don’t think anyone would disagree with council using this type of facility; however the location is HIGHLY INNAPROPRIATE. It is too close to people’s homes & was purchased to be remediated for COSS usage. Your proposal seems short-sighted regarding potential Risk Management issues. The largest oversight does not mention that Clarence Road is too narrow, too steep & TOO DANGEROUS for trucks to be frequenting with pedestrians. The road has been devastated by council truck usage to date & this will increase. From the beginning of Clarence Rd to the Quarry entrance this road is in a constant state of disrepair. Immediately past the Quarry entrance where trucks do not go, the road is in good condition, as are side roads off Clarence Rd & other nearby entrances to roads in other estates. This is the single road in & out of the estate for over 1000 people. Danger’s regarding stockpiling materials & running machinery in a bush location is insane. GCC you have the opportunity to right 15yrs of inappropriate usage of COSS Trust Funds. Let’s work together in finding a more appropriate, safer location to recycle construction material. Let’s remediate this old Quarry site to ‘fill the strategic COSS gap’ so the Central Coast community can enjoy this site as originally intended. For those Councillors thinking of voting in favour of rezoning, I challenge you to go for a walk with a pedestrian such as a schoolchild on their way to the bus top before making your decision. If this site is not remediated, come, next council elections those counsellor’s whom vote in favour of rezoning this COSS site will have a whole suburb focused on making sure you are not re-elected into your current position.
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  15. 115
    Name: Matthew Stocks on Nov 24, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  16. 116
    Name: Petra Taylor on Nov 24, 2012
    Comments: When buying my Home it was under the understanding that the Quarry will be regenerated. We chose our home under the understanding that we can live in peace and quiet and I am able to sleep throughout the day considering I am working night shift only. Now with the proposed changes you are putting my health in serious danger. As with the noise and dust pollution it will make it almost impossible for myself to find appropriate rest. This makes a mockery of future Home-owners to research the area they buy in as council seem to not keep to their promises and just do what they want. Please do reconsider your proposal as We did not choose to live near an Industrial zoning but a Bush land setting . regards Petra Taylor
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  17. 117
    Name: Jason IDE on Nov 24, 2012
    Comments: My kids use Clarence rd to walk and ride to school everyday and the increase of trucks on this road is concerning.
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  18. 118
    Name: Matthew Maxwell on Nov 24, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I don't know
    Flag
  19. 119
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 24, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  20. 120
    Name: PETA Dusting on Nov 24, 2012
    Comments: don't put the quarry in pu residential backyard. it is dangerou, toxic,unsafe
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I agree
    Flag
  21. 121
    Name: Sallyjerome on Nov 24, 2012
    Comments: this is a ludicrous proposal for a residential area and so not in keeping with COSS intentions and conventions
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  22. 122
    Name: Kerrie & Theo Kristidis on Nov 25, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  23. 123
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 25, 2012
    Comments: Please re-think this!!!
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?:
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?:
    Flag
  24. 124
    Name: Katie on Nov 25, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  25. 125
    Name: Damien Moey on Nov 25, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  26. 126
    Name: Samuel Collins on Nov 25, 2012
    Comments: This is an outrage.This is not suitable for a residential area. Council need to do the right thing and deliver the recreation are that was promised!!
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  27. 127
    Name: Samuel Collins on Nov 25, 2012
    Comments: This is an outrage.This is not suitable for a residential area. Council need to do the right thing and deliver the recreation are that was promised!!
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  28. 128
    Name: Ben Dillon on Nov 25, 2012
    Comments: I have a young family and I am very worried about the implications this proposal would have on their health as well as the health and quality of life for my fellow residents.This should be stopped immediately.
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  29. 129
    Name: Barry Johannson on Nov 25, 2012
    Comments: It would appear this site has been blatantly misused for sometime with total disregard for residents health and no attempt to contain piles of crushed concrete and bitumous dust. This proposal seems like a desperate attempt to cover it up. I wonder what damage has already been done? Where is the respect and consideration for the people of Springfield. They are ratepayers too.
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  30. 130
    Name: Lee Dunbar on Nov 25, 2012
    Comments: What is it that the Gosford council does not understand about COSS? Are they not educated?
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  31. 131
    Name: Anne-Marie Nicholls on Nov 25, 2012
    Comments: No rezoning of Springfield quarry, Lawrie! No trucks on Clarence Rd right beside my and many other children, walking on the road (no paths) to and from their school bus! No dust polluting our environment, or noise - keeping shift workers and young children from their precious daytime sleep!
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  32. 132
    Name: Alexandra Hoan on Nov 25, 2012
    Comments: There s no place for such heavy industry in a residential. Rezoning doesn't make it appropriate either. Please find a more suitable location for this operation
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  33. 133
    Name: Cailin D on Nov 25, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  34. 134
    Name: Jeff Hallam on Nov 25, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  35. 135
    Name: Dot Kirkup on Nov 25, 2012
    Comments: Springfield is a great place to live and to have my grandchildren go to school ... It's NOT an industrial area and should not be used as such Please consider how you would feel if this proposal was to occur in 'your back yard" Please find a suitable industrial site and stop the plan for Springfield
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  36. 136
    Name: Louise Nichols on Nov 26, 2012
    Comments: Too close to housing and school! I doubt any council members would like to live that close to a facility such as the proposed.
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  37. 137
    Name: Bill Herd on Nov 26, 2012
    Comments: Anyone who goes up and down Clarence Rd daily knows the road is a disgrace and will only get worse with trucks frequently using it, keep the facility in an INDUSTRIAL area and NOT RESIDENTIAL area Gosford Council.
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  38. 138
    Name: Bernie on Nov 26, 2012
    Comments: not in my back yard
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  39. 139
    Name: Heidi Hervay on Nov 26, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  40. 140
    Name: Leisel on Nov 26, 2012
    Comments: its too close to residential homes and the main road
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I don't know
    Flag
  41. 141
    Name: Phillip Kingsmill on Nov 26, 2012
    Comments: The land should be used for the purpose under which it was obtained.
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I agree
    Flag
  42. 142
    Name: Blake Ardley on Nov 26, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  43. 143
    Name: Jenny Webb on Nov 26, 2012
    Comments: 16 years ago, I gave birth to a beautiful baby boy. 6 weeks later, my world came crashing down around me as he was diagnosed with the disease Cystic Fibrosis. Cystic Fibrosis affects breathing, digestion and life. The upside to my son's diagnosis, was the fact that we were living in Springfield, on the NSW Central Coast - not only were we close to the medical facilities my son so desperately needed, but we were living in a clean, healthy environment, with clean air - one of the most vital resources necessary to ensure my son lived beyond his teenage years. We have worked hard every minute of every day over the past 16 years, to maintain the health of my son. Unfortunately, Cystic Fibrosis has no cure, and as well as the numerous day to day medications and therapies my son receives, his lung disease has now progressed to a stage where he requires daily oxygen. The clean air in Springfield plays such a huge role in the health of my son. It is devastating to think that the council is happy to knowingly pollute our air and jeopardise not only the health of my son, but the health of so many others. I have fought hard to keep my son alive - please don't make his daily struggle to breathe any harder than it already is. He deserves so much more. Jenny Webb
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?:
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?:
    Flag
  44. 144
    Name: Anne McNamara on Nov 26, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I don't know
    Flag
  45. 145
    Name: Clare Brown on Nov 26, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  46. 146
    Name: Maureen Melville on Nov 26, 2012
    Comments: NO WE DON'T WANT THIS IN SPRINGFIELD.
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly disagree
    Flag
  47. 147
    Name: Larissa Hackett on Nov 26, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  48. 148
    Name: Sylvia Perez on Nov 26, 2012
    Comments:
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  49. 149
    Name: Olga Lucia De La Espriella on Nov 26, 2012
    Comments: This is just Horrendous!
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I strongly disagree (should not use)
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag
  50. 150
    Name: Hannah Pate on Nov 26, 2012
    Comments: I cam concerned about the quarry and don't believe this is good use of council property
    Should GCC use the COSS land site to recycle concrete (crush) & green waste?: I agree
    Should GCC remediate the COSS site immediately as originally planned 15yrs ago?: I strongly agree
    Flag

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4 »

Sponsored links