No Public Works at Tabor Property

Signatures 435 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 9 › »

1. 51
   Name: Marybeth Ciarlelli on Nov 26, 2012

   Address?:

   Comments: Please keep PW facility out of TABOR and its residential neighborhoods. RTM & BoF need to protect the scenic Branford River Gateway and wildlife which are an asset to our town.

   Flag
2. 52
   Name: Jason Sabatino on Nov 26, 2012

   Address?:

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 53
   Name: Marion Sudac on Nov 26, 2012

   Address?:

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 54
   Name: Nancy Kendrick on Nov 27, 2012

   Address?:

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 55
   Name: Richard Puchalski on Nov 27, 2012

   Address?:

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 56
   Name: Diane Puchalski on Nov 27, 2012

   Address?:

   Comments: NO!

   Flag
7. 57
   Name: Frederick Russo on Nov 28, 2012

   Address?:

   Comments: I am opposed to having the proposed PW garage located at the Tabor.site. The Town has maintained a dump for the last 60 years in our residential neighborhood. I believe that a commericial building belongs on a commericial site.

   Flag
8. 58
   Name: Kristen Esperti on Nov 28, 2012

   Address?:

   Comments: Indian Neck Resident

   Flag
9. 59
   Name: STEPHEN R LARSON on Nov 28, 2012

   Address?:

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 60
    Name: Kenneth Johnson on Nov 28, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 61
    Name: George R. Platt on Nov 28, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments: I oppose the location of the Public Works garage at the Tabor site.

    Flag
12. 62
    Name: Sandy Bohan on Nov 28, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments: Since there is an alternative site that is more centrally located it makes no sense to use the Tabor site and disturb a residential area.

    Flag
13. 63
    Name: Arlene F. Steinlauf on Nov 28, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments: Public Works does not belong in a residential area especially with other more suitable locations available.

    Flag
14. 64
    Name: Clotilde Calderwood on Nov 28, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments: Public work facility should be located in a non-residential area in order to avoid unnecessary nuisance to Branford residents. Please make the right decision to preserve the calm and beauty of the town of Branford as well as the wellbeing of its residents.

    Flag
15. 65
    Name: Lucille McEachern-Murray on Nov 28, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 66
    Name: Edward T. Murray on Nov 28, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 67
    Name: Lauren Loomis on Nov 28, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 68
    Name: Teresa B Storer on Nov 28, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments: This is such a BAD idea!

    Flag
19. 69
    Name: Sandy Lecza on Nov 28, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 70
    Name: Orit on Nov 28, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 71
    Name: Leesan Villa on Nov 28, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments: I have four young children and I know this could pose a dangerous situation having trucks coming and going on narrow streets in a residential neighborhood. Tabor Rd. floods daily and Ark will be used, no doubt about it, where many children play. Build a Public Works Station in a Non-Residential Area that does not flood and where roads are wide and children are never playing in the street. Are you willing to accept the consequences if one of our neighborhood children accidentally get hit by one of the Town of Branford's Trucks? Children under the age of 10 ride their bikes and play street hockey in this residential neighborhood often. Think about what you're doing by putting a Public Works Station in a residential neighborhood that FLOODS!!!

    Flag
22. 72
    Name: Hollie Tryon on Nov 28, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 73
    Name: Ann Devlin on Nov 28, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 74
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 28, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments: Unc, find another location

    Flag
25. 75
    Name: CDFerrucci on Nov 28, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments: How can you think this is a good idea? Protect the quality of life for those of us in this neighborhood. Or... if you make this Tabor/Public Works idea permanent, try living in the neighborhoods impacted by it! Start listening to the voters, folks.

    Flag
26. 76
    Name: Janey Cooper on Nov 28, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments: I oppose the location of the Public Works garage at the Tabor site. . Flag

    Flag
27. 77
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 28, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 78
    Name: Faith Mcgrath on Nov 28, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments: There is a viable alternative site, a commercial piece of property in an industrial area off of Rt. 1. (behind Tremonte Cadillac). This location could easily accommodate the new building and would be more centrally located within the Town.

    Flag
29. 79
    Name: Anthony Alfone on Nov 29, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 80
    Name: Rosanne Schroeder on Nov 29, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments: Ridiculous Plan Please do not approve these funds for PWF at Tabor site.

    Flag
31. 81
    Name: David Engelhart on Nov 29, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 82
    Name: David Loomis on Nov 29, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 83
    Name: Paul Costanzo on Nov 29, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 84
    Name: Jennifer Nelson on Nov 29, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 85
    Name: Pete Lombard on Nov 29, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments: Quality of life is important and we should find a location closer to route one on in an industrial area.

    Flag
36. 86
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 29, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 87
    Name: Carl Denaro on Nov 29, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 88
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 29, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 89
    Name: Kendra Martin on Nov 29, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 90
    Name: MICHAEL DANIELE on Nov 29, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments: The town should just keep it where it is on rt 139. It is an industrial area already and fits in fine over there. Does not belong in a residential area.

    Flag
41. 91
    Name: Patricia Mack on Nov 29, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 92
    Name: Lori Nicholson on Nov 29, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments: Tabor is a residential area and the placement of DPW will decrease the quality of life for the residents who reside in the vicinity. It is more suited for open space or bike and walking trails. Why not bird watching and a nature preserve?

    Flag
43. 93
    Name: Andy DeVito on Nov 29, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments: I'm a resident of Indian Neck and I do not want the public works facility located on the Tabor property. The Rt 1 corridor is a more suitable location.

    Flag
44. 94
    Name: Stephanie Gardner on Nov 30, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 95
    Name: Mal Sulkes on Nov 30, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments: we're much too residential for such a commercial endeavor.

    Flag
46. 96
    Name: Kathy Sulkes on Nov 30, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments: please consider a more remote location such as the tremonte Cadillac area.

    Flag
47. 97
    Name: Jennifer Aniskovich on Nov 30, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 98
    Name: Kyum & Gail Pyun on Nov 30, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 99
    Name: Elizabeth Rose on Nov 30, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 100
    Name: Deborah Platt on Dec 1, 2012

    Address?:

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... 9 › »