No CUP for Hydrochloric Acid Site in Sheridan

Signatures 37 total

Page: 1

1. 1
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 25, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 25, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 25, 2006

   Comments: Thank you for alerting me about this issue. My husband's bone marrow was detroyed by the benzene in the gasoline he worked around right here in Sheridan. There are things within our community that are extremely hazardous to our health.

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: JuDee Gilmer on Nov 25, 2006

   Comments: Please add my name to the petition AGAINST the conditional use permit.

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Bradon Fackrell on Nov 25, 2006

   Comments: I am against the CUP for this, please add my name to the list of citizens that wish to NOT allow this permit. THank you.

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 26, 2006

   Comments: i do not want such an operation in our beautiful community. citizens shoud have strong input into denying this petition.

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Sharon Fackrell on Nov 26, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 26, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 27, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Del Seville on Nov 27, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Del Seville on Nov 27, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: John Sutton on Nov 27, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Renee King on Nov 27, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Carol Minick on Nov 27, 2006

    Comments: Why not put this plant in Acme which is near the highway

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Tammi Bock on Nov 27, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 27, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 27, 2006

    Comments: There has to be a safer, more approperate place to put this CUP site.

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Judy Carlson on Nov 27, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Gary Mc Knight on Nov 27, 2006

    Comments: I believe this is not in the best interest of sheridan and the surrounding area.

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Harriet Elkington on Nov 29, 2006

    Comments: Our city and country are relatively safe. Let us keep it that way. Too many things that have been supposed to be safe have turned out to be otherwise. We know that there have been too many toxic spills of chemicals already.

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Christina Gonzales on Nov 29, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Mel Logan on Nov 29, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Jane Taras Carlson on Nov 30, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Wade Epperson on Dec 1, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Gina M. Clingerman on Dec 1, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Gina M. Clingerman on Dec 1, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Claudia Schaeffer on Dec 4, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 4, 2006

    Comments: I feel that this project could be located in a less populated place. And I don't think that up by the landfill would be an appropriate place either, since I work in that area. I feel that the city planners and county planners need to work more closely together in their long term development for this city - right now you have asphalt plants next to offices and hotels. I have to breath the fumes from the asphalt plant. After watching the coverage on the local tv - I don't have much confidence in the local fire department being able to take care of things if there is a spill. I also don't like the fact that Sue from EMIT kept saying "it isn't likely" to all the things that were brought up as concerns. Wasn't Three Mile Island considered to be "state of the art" in its day Anything is possible!

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Kat Oropeza on Dec 11, 2006

    Comments: I won't be able to get to the meeting on the 14th, but we live in Downer, and would like to go on record as totally opposed to this project. We feel it is far too dangerous to be anywhere near a populated area or watersheds.

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Audrey Malan on Dec 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Melanie Araas on Dec 12, 2006

    Comments: I am an employee at Big Horn Beverage on Fort Road which is adjacent to the proposed Acid Transfer Facility being planned by Emit Technologies. After following this project in the news, I have not yet heard anything that would make me feel better about having this dangerous material being handled and transported so close to where I work every day and so close to other residential and business areas. Every day I drive by the uncontrolled intersection on North Main and hearing that it would continue to be uncontrolled is completely unacceptable to me. I don

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: JAMES PODGORNIK on Dec 14, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 14, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Steven Melneck on Dec 15, 2006

    Comments: Please vote NO

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Steve Hyatt on Dec 15, 2006

    Comments: the future should not be overlooked about this type of business lets not get greedy just because of the supposed idea of fifty jobs and the obvious profit of only one individual from it all

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Jessica Podgornik on Dec 17, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Travis Cooper on Jun 24, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1