Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 280 total

Page: « 1, ... 3, 4, 5, 6

  1. 251
    Name: Sue Joyner on Dec 1, 2012
    Comments: Disappointed
    Flag
  2. 252
    Name: David Hodgson on Dec 1, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 253
    Name: Sheila Newbury on Dec 2, 2012
    Comments: St Mary's Barwell Leicester Diocese
    Flag
  4. 254
    Name: Sandra Stafford on Dec 2, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 255
    Name: Paul Bagshaw on Dec 2, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 256
    Name: Rev'd Rosie Bates on Dec 2, 2012
    Comments: Fundamentally, could we also have a clear statement on tradition and reason and current obligations concerning the use of Scripture in The Church of England. Many of us find this now open wide to gross abuse and the cosequent damage to young minds is distressing beyond any supportable belief.
    Flag
  7. 257
    Name: Sue Whitlock on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments: If a vote in General Synod can produce a result so at odds with general feeling within the Church, there has to be something wrong with it.
    Flag
  8. 258
    Name: Tony Robson on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments: This is the 21st century.
    Flag
  9. 259
    Name: Trevor James on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments: It is more a lack of confidence in the present process of producing representives to the General Synod which has manifested itself - but the General Synod should have anticiapted this problem from previous attempts to thwart its progress.
    Flag
  10. 260
    Name: Colin Ball on Dec 3, 2012
    Comments: Unless the General Synod finds a way to very quickly change its recent decision on women Bishops, then it is very difficult to have any confidence in them!
    Flag
  11. 261
    Name: Brenda Liptrot on Dec 4, 2012
    Comments: The General Synod needs urgent reform. On a matter as important as Woman Bishops surely it should be possible for everyone on electoral rolls to have an individual vote. That would be democratic and give an honest reflection of the laity's wishes.
    Flag
  12. 262
    Name: George Hanna on Dec 4, 2012
    Comments: The synod seems to be overloaded with minority views.
    Flag
  13. 263
    Name: Alice Stiven on Dec 5, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 264
    Name: Philip L L Ingham on Dec 5, 2012
    Comments: I have nev er had confidence in synodical government. Ours is an Episcopal Church and should be gutded by its bishops.
    Flag
  15. 265
    Name: NEIL WALTERS on Dec 5, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 266
    Name: Ed Davis on Dec 6, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 267
    Name: Angela Berners-Wilson on Dec 6, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 268
    Name: Tracey Kitchen on Dec 6, 2012
    Comments: This decision makes our Church look anachronistic & undemocratic in the eyes of the wider community.
    Flag
  19. 269
    Name: Andrew McCosh on Dec 6, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 270
    Name: Penny Millichamp on Dec 6, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 271
    Name: Rebecca Tinsley on Dec 7, 2012
    Comments: I attend St Matthew's, Bayswater, Westminster.
    Flag
  22. 272
    Name: John Kaye on Dec 9, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 273
    Name: Jeff Dando on Dec 9, 2012
    Comments: This decision is a disgrace to all those who voted against. They all knew what the majority of the church members wanted yet they still voted against. It' s time the voting system was changed to reflect the will of the majority.
    Flag
  24. 274
    Name: Jeyan Anketell on Dec 9, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 275
    Name: Laura Mizzi on Dec 9, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 276
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 10, 2012
    Comments: An absolute masterpiece of mis-drafting. Incompetent administration of General Synod.
    Flag
  27. 277
    Name: John Polhill on Dec 12, 2012
    Comments: I think it should be made clear that Lay Members of Synod are expected to represent the view of their diocese, or to make ot clear to the diocese synod if they intend to vote against its wishes
    Flag
  28. 278
    Name: Lynda Plumpton on Dec 14, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 279
    Name: Michael Elson on Dec 15, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 280
    Name: Amazing Site on Mar 3, 2013
    Comments: pE2nq5 I really liked your blog article.Really thank you! Awesome.
    Flag

Page: « 1, ... 3, 4, 5, 6

Sponsored links