Signatures 280 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 › »
-
151
Name: Stephen Barney on Nov 26, 2012Comments: Emmanuel Church Loughborough, Leicester Diocese. Unless clear and decisive action os taken this General Synod should be disolved and re-electedFlag
-
152
Name: Barbara Edwards on Nov 26, 2012Comments: St Bartholomews Penn Wolverhampton LichfieldFlag
-
153
Name: Mike Edwards on Nov 26, 2012Comments: St Barts Penn LichfieldFlag
-
154
Name: Dr Ian Atherton on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
155
Name: Sally Brockley on Nov 26, 2012Comments: It is shameful for the church to allow a small minority to ignore the wishes of the majority. The system needs changing.Flag
-
156
Name: Ron Mc Turk on Nov 26, 2012Comments: St Pauls Church Pendeford, Litchfield DioceseFlag
-
157
Name: Carl Wood on Nov 26, 2012Comments: How can a system that allows a vociferous minority to overrule an overwhelming majority to be said to be fit for purpose?Flag
-
158
Name: Chris Thorpe on Nov 26, 2012Comments: Synod should stand down and be re-elected, and the provision should be put as a simple proposition. The church should not be exempt from equality legislation.Flag
-
159
Name: Michael Shaw on Nov 26, 2012Comments: How can such and outdated and out of touch organisation continue in its present formatFlag
-
160
Name: Caroline Barker Bennett on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
161
Name: Revd Linda Hood on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
162
Name: Catherina Griffiths on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
163
Name: Anonymous on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
164
Name:
Caroline Driscoll on Nov 26, 2012
Comments: I can't believe this is happening in my lifetime. What am I supposed to tell my 8 year old daughter, she is insufficient in the eyes of the church? Any railings I can chain myself to?Flag -
165
Name: Barney Branston on Nov 26, 2012Comments: A deeply damaging "no" vote from an overly-powerful minority which shows the church as massively out of step with society, raising very real concerns as to its role and relevance today. The secular society could not have done more damage: if it wasn't so serious in its likely consequences it would be farcical.Flag
-
166
Name: Sarah Perrett, St Andrew's Church, Great Staughton, Ely Diocese on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
167
Name: Peter Bithell on Nov 26, 2012Comments: Totally dismayed by the short sighted vote of the synood membersFlag
-
168
Name: Dr Peter Raggatt on Nov 26, 2012Comments: St Marys St Neots Parish Church, Diocese of Ely member of Deanery SynodFlag
-
169
Name: Helen Irvine on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
170
Name: Ann Crook on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
171
Name: David Brook on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
172
Name: Shirley Tart on Nov 26, 2012Comments: St Andrew's Church, Shifnal, Shropshire Good luck - you'll need it!Flag
-
173
Name: T P Moore on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
174
Name: Susan Whitehouse on Nov 26, 2012Comments: i am in complete agreement with the aims of this petition. The silent majority need to reclaim their Synod.Flag
-
175
Name: Mrs Judith Ruff on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
176
Name: John Hume on Nov 26, 2012Comments: I have not one bit of support for the General synod. St. Andrew's church Shifnal- Lichfield DioceseFlag
-
177
Name: Kate Hume on Nov 26, 2012Comments: I askthe new Archbishop to bring the General Synod into the 21st century, St. Anders, Shifnal, LichfieldFlag
-
178
Name: Barrie P. Bench on Nov 26, 2012Comments: Do the Lay members of the Synod live the same community as the rest of us?Flag
-
179
Name: Jan Pinkard on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
180
Name: Rachel Morris on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
181
Name: Phil Needham on Nov 26, 2012Comments: The Church At Perton, Lichfield DioceseFlag
-
182
Name: Kaihsu Tai on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
183
Name: Rev. Sarah Lawrence on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
184
Name: Gary Grief on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
185
Name: Alan Nash on Nov 26, 2012Comments: St Andrew`s Church Shifnal ShropshireFlag
-
186
Name: Philippa Bignell on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
187
Name: Philip Douglas on Nov 26, 2012Comments: Lichfield diocese. Wednesfield St Thomas.Flag
-
188
Name: Alyson Bryant on Nov 26, 2012Comments: I would like to see women bishopsFlag
-
189
Name: Alyson Bryant on Nov 26, 2012Comments: I would like to see women bishopsFlag
-
190
Name: Mrs C Welch on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
191
Name: Linda Collins (Rev!) on Nov 26, 2012Comments: This is vital to prevent the Chirch of England being completely out of touch with the equality conscious generation it so longs to attract.Flag
-
192
Name: Revd Paula Clifford on Nov 26, 2012Comments: Yes and keep the momentum going. Apathy already showing in my congregation.Flag
-
193
Name: Maureen Hobbs on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
194
Name: Sue Devine on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
195
Name: Anonymous on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
196
Name: Andrew Watson on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag
-
197
Name: Revd Nigel Coatsworth on Nov 26, 2012Comments: I agree that the House of Laity is not representative of the laity of the church of England, and that the method of electing the House of Laity is disconnected from the local parishes.Flag
-
198
Name: Ian Bain on Nov 26, 2012Comments: St Andrews Shifnal, Lichfield dioceseFlag
-
199
Name: Gillian Booth on Nov 26, 2012Comments: I was in total disbelief at this decision. It makes me wonder if I really want to belong to this church any moreFlag
-
200
Name: David Booth on Nov 26, 2012Comments:Flag