No Confidence in General Synod: Calling for an Urgent Review

Signatures 280 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 › »

1. 101
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 24, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Bryony Morrison on Nov 25, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Carole Goddard on Nov 25, 2012

   Comments: From the debate it was clear that there were those who were voting against women bishops and NOT against the measure. I am ashamed to be an Anglican.

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Chris Griffiths on Nov 25, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Jeremy Fagan on Nov 25, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Dr Andrew Nadell on Nov 25, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 25, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Simon Sarmiento on Nov 25, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: David Runcorn on Nov 25, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Canon Judith Maltby on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Helen King on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Rev Anne Morris on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments: Synod should be dissolved as an act of penance - it has brought the church into disrepute

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Karen Mottershead on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Charlotte Appleby on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments: Our representatives to the deanery synod are simply the only people willing to volunteer, so no wonder they are not representative. Next time, we should vote for women bishops with no opt outs for the women haters, their position is untenable and we shoud not make concessions to them. We are commanded to love one another and that does not mean telling half the world they are unworthy human beings.

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Jenny Wood on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments: I would like to see all of Christianity realise that women should take an equal position in all roles within the churches and ministry. It is time to bring the Patristic Period to an end. The Church Fathers erased the role of women in early church and the Christian religions have continued to reduce women for the past 18 centuries. This is only a very brief summary, but, a worthwhile point for further investigation.

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Arthur Dark on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments: Why not simply give indivudual members on the Electoral Rolls of the parish churches the right to a secret vote for representatives in the House of Laity?

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Patrick Appleby on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Peter Hall on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Jean Rosslowe on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments: The government should intervene

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Peter B. Mussen on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments: Sadly, it seems that we have adopted the RC tradition of 1st and 2nd class baptismal certificates. If you're male, you receive the 1st class treatment, if you're female... PB Mussen, Stratford, ON, Canada Diocese of Huron

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Michael Gardner on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Su Reid on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Kerri Canepa on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Jamie Warden on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Bertie Bob Frost on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Alan Mottershead on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Sue Watson on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments: I support the no confidence motion.

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Charles Appleby on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Fr John E. Harris-White on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments: Synod voting shouild be like parliamentary voting, a simple majority

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Helen Stanton on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: John Bristow on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Lady Kenya Tatton-Brown on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments: Years ago I was a member of the General Synod when the Ordination of Women was starting its passage. The Antis let reason and good behaviour go to the wall then too

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Janet Robinson on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Deanna Tyndall on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Rt Rev'd Helen Hamilton on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Kevin Billingham on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments: Please see my comments below "No Confidence in General Synod: Calling for an Urgent Review"

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Kathleen Billingham on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments: Please see my comments below "No Confidence in General Synod: Calling for an Urgent Review"

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Phil Pritchard on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments: Church at Perton Lichfield Diocese

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Carol Brennan on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Susanna Watson on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: Susanna Watson on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Delia Stanway on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Christine Polhill on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: N Welch on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Jenny on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Dr John Pinkard on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments: I totally fee that the rules are grossly unfair and making the C of E a laughing stock

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: John Little on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Revd Prebendary John Allan RD on Nov 25, 2012

    Comments: I believe an urgent review into the rules of governance in General Synod is absolutely essential, if faith in the synodical system has any chance whatsoever to be restored.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 › »