NBHA Co-Sanction Petition

Signatures 312 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 › »

1. 251
   Name: Diane Wurzburg on Jan 15, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 252
   Name: Jay Hoh on Jan 15, 2013

   Comments: Just a note: This petition follows a 5 month effort that included a rider survey in which 95% of 50+ Seniors said that they did not mind competing against 40+ Masters in a single class. 93% of those surveyed preferred paying two sanctioning fees rather than have split classes/split paybacks. Our club asked for approval of show with IBRA sanction fees refunded to NBHA members who requested it. Then NBHA changed the rule to absolutely no co-sanctioning. Then they got so much heat they made it a regional director decision - strange for a national organization. But our regional director produces big shows that compete with our shows only hours away, so, BINGO, no co-sanctioning allowed in our region. Conflict of interest, perhaps? Just hoping that they live up to the second line of their rulebook: "Our goals are to increase the number of participants, improve the quality of shows and enhance the image of barrel racing."

   Flag
3. 253
   Name: Jayma Jo Shomaker on Jan 15, 2013

   Comments: I didnt renew my NBHA membership because I cant run at co-santioned shows. Why would an organization that is supposed to be trying to make the sport of barrel racing better hurt/limit so many of its members. With the way the economy and fuel prices are, having a co-santioned show only makes since. NBHA needs to realize that they are not the only organization available to the barrel racers and the regional directors that have prohibited the co-santions need to realize they are not god!

   Flag
4. 254
   Name: Jodi Graham on Jan 15, 2013

   Comments: It would really help the organization if you would co-sanction the shows.

   Flag
5. 255
   Name: Lisa Monroe on Jan 15, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 256
   Name: Shannon Hartenstein on Jan 15, 2013

   Comments: New York 03

   Flag
7. 257
   Name: Joseph Chamberlain on Jan 16, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 258
   Name: Sharon Campbell on Jan 16, 2013

   Comments: I think its wrong to make someone stop in me of season, because of one rule!!

   Flag
9. 259
   Name: Laura Primm on Jan 16, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 260
    Name: Tara Fisher on Jan 16, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 261
    Name: Doug Joyce on Jan 16, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 262
    Name: Alison Tebbens on Jan 16, 2013

    Comments: I think allowing co-sanctioned shows would increase participation and help promote local events in my area.

    Flag
13. 263
    Name: Kathy Farrelly on Jan 16, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 264
    Name: Donna Harper on Jan 16, 2013

    Comments: DISAGREE WITH PETITION

    Flag
15. 265
    Name: Sandra A Brewer on Jan 16, 2013

    Comments: I belong to a small district with minimal arenas available to us. We have been able to co-sanction with other association which allows us to draw a larger participant entry. Many of the barrel racers belong to numerous associations and by allowing co-sanctioning, they can continue to run for points and not have to choose. In this time of economic variance, we are not able to travel and spend the money on fuel like we use to. Allowing co-sanctioning between associations and committees, helps the pocketbook and continues to promote everyone. If the problem is sanctioning fees, then derive a plan in which NBHA will always get something.

    Flag
16. 266
    Name: Josey Brewer on Jan 16, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 267
    Name: Jennie Cherkis on Jan 17, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 268
    Name: Jody Hochadel on Jan 17, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 269
    Name: Vic Marrale,attica,ny on Jan 17, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 270
    Name: April Tuscher on Jan 17, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 271
    Name: Carol Anne Ritter on Jan 17, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 272
    Name: Pam Isaman on Jan 17, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 273
    Name: Adam on Jan 17, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 274
    Name: Anne Wood on Jan 17, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 275
    Name: Brittany Spencer on Jan 19, 2013

    Comments: I feel there is nothing wrong with co-sanctioning.

    Flag
26. 276
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 19, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 277
    Name: Beth Penland on Jan 20, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 278
    Name: Mason Penland on Jan 20, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 279
    Name: Kent Penland on Jan 20, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 280
    Name: Vicki Lewis on Jan 20, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 281
    Name: Rhonda Parks on Jan 20, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 282
    Name: Diana Altman on Jan 20, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 283
    Name: Alicia Surrena on Jan 20, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 284
    Name: Leticia Powell on Jan 20, 2013

    Comments: I totally agree with this. Thx.

    Flag
35. 285
    Name: Lynde L Doup on Jan 21, 2013

    Comments: I miss running NBHA. I was a memeber for 15 yrs and this yr is the first yr I am not running NBHA because NBHA is all about NBHA, they are not trying the work for the members or helping the horses out by just letting them run one time!!! I am from Indiana 04. Richard and Buffy Smith WAS our directors. They done an awesome job. we was one of IN's biggest group. Then Bob Hess ran everyone off and NBHA was not helping us out!!! Calls were made to the main office and messages were left and we never received a call back!!! We now run IBRA were they are all about working to make the shows larger and Praising GOD!!!!! I hope to see NBHA gets their shit together!!!

    Flag
36. 286
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 21, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 287
    Name: Jade Nolan on Jan 21, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 288
    Name: Cindy Davis on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments: New York State NBHA riders cannot run alone as NBHA- not big enough in this area and other closest NBHA is too far away to run. not financially feasible to only have NBHA without co-sanctioning. My granddaughter and i just joined last year. i will not renew until this is settled. Whoever made this new decision needs to come to our very rural area of NY and see how bad a decision they made. NBHA if this is only for NEW York and PA- very unfair. talk to your riders and the folks that are doing the driving at $4.50 a gallon for fuel! and 3-4 hours driving each way. not acceptable.

    Flag
39. 289
    Name: Tina Sherman on Jan 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 290
    Name: Susan Hargis on Jan 23, 2013

    Comments: I am the VA IBRA Director. My kids love to show at the NBHA youth world. I think it benefits both organizations for people to travel to one location and get points for both. This year because of the double entry fees I am seeing a lot of shows only support one organization. Its not only IBRA that it is effecting. I have approved IBRA shows that are not co-sanctioning with NBHA because of it.

    Flag
41. 291
    Name: Alishia Shafer on Jan 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 292
    Name: Alishia Shafer on Jan 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 293
    Name: Tammy Shafer on Jan 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 294
    Name: Bill Pittenger on Jan 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 295
    Name: Raymond Shafer on Jan 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 296
    Name: Shana Grow on Jan 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 297
    Name: Terry Grow on Jan 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 298
    Name: Betty Fox on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: It only makes sense for the NBHA and the IBRA to co-operate and co-sanction each other's shows! This policy is best for everyone!

    Flag
49. 299
    Name: Karen Kutera on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 300
    Name: Tracy Hadfield on Jan 28, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 › »