Signatures 312 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 › »
-
151
Name: Karen Harrer on Jan 12, 2013Comments:Flag
-
152
Name: Kelly Haffner on Jan 12, 2013Comments:Flag
-
153
Name: Lisa Weaver on Jan 12, 2013Comments:Flag
-
154
Name: Billy Frey on Jan 12, 2013Comments:Flag
-
155
Name: Melissa Dishong on Jan 12, 2013Comments:Flag
-
156
Name: Mary Green on Jan 13, 2013Comments: it makes it a little more affordable to co sanctionFlag
-
157
Name: Deneane Peirson on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
158
Name:
Ryan Smith on Jan 13, 2013
Comments:Flag -
159
Name: Ann Jackson on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
160
Name: Patricia Bell on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
161
Name: Kellie Smith on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
162
Name: Tanya Konopinski on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
163
Name: Kevin Konopinski on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
164
Name: Lisa Kelly on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
165
Name: Pamela Stapp on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
166
Name: Jenna Stapp on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
167
Name: Raymond Duncan on Jan 13, 2013Comments: Co-sanctioning is the way to go.Flag
-
168
Name: Sam Farley on Jan 13, 2013Comments: Our club is going with Open shows +added money. Due to unfair treatment and lack of support from NBHA.Flag
-
169
Name: Brandy Hudgens on Jan 13, 2013Comments: yes it should be. Especially with the number that are down.Flag
-
170
Name: Bronson on Jan 13, 2013Comments: I personally would not run NBHA but know a lot of people that woul prefer it and it would benefit producers.Flag
-
171
Name: Kayla Hufsmith on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
172
Name: Alexandra Hillegass on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
173
Name: Kaci Horton on Jan 13, 2013Comments: co sanctioning is the only way to go if you care about your members and their horses.Flag
-
174
Name: Tom Stapp on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
175
Name: Emma Stapp on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
176
Name: Tommy Lynch on Jan 13, 2013Comments: As much as it cost just to get to shows these days why the NBHA DOES NOT WONT TO CO-SANCTION shows.Flag
-
177
Name: Katie Tietz on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
178
Name: Yvonne Turan on Jan 13, 2013Comments: With the costs increasing all the way around, for producers, and competitors. This makes a lot of scense. Other organizations can do this successfully so NBHA should be able to do it as well and not make it a hardship on their members. Co-sanctioned shows have a bigger draw and payouts. It's a win/win situation. NBHA is a great organization but don't be close minded.Flag
-
179
Name: Jeannie Wright on Jan 13, 2013Comments: It is for everyone's benefit and growth of the NBHA as well to permit full same run co -sanctioning with other barrel racing organizations. Please reconsider in order to benefit barrel racers of all ages.Flag
-
180
Name: Donald Miller on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
181
Name:
Tina Main on Jan 13, 2013
Comments: I do not belong due to no district activities in my area, I do avoid any straight NBHA shows and do not mind the classes being combined. IF we had shows within a reasonable drive and they were combined I might reconsider joining.Flag -
182
Name: Tammy Dugan on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
183
Name: Sarah Helmick on Jan 13, 2013Comments:Flag
-
184
Name: Susan Gardner on Jan 14, 2013Comments:Flag
-
185
Name: Robin Weaver on Jan 14, 2013Comments:Flag
-
186
Name: Mwalters4@gmail.com on Jan 14, 2013Comments: In places where there are fewer shows it is the best use of resources and travel time to co-sanction with other groups. It allows riders to make two shows and not have to choose between the two.Flag
-
187
Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013Comments: NBHA State DirectorFlag
-
188
Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013Comments: Co-sanction is best for everyone both members and the associations involved. Most members are part of more than one assoc. And we like the chance to run for both assocs without having to travel constantly. With the cost of fuel and entry fees contestants have to choose between assoc and make the best choice. Which results in both associations having less members.Flag
-
189
Name: Willie Nolan on Jan 14, 2013Comments:Flag
-
190
Name: Jennifer Nolan on Jan 14, 2013Comments: If we are not allowed to co-sanction our small district will die out. We just don't have enough barrel racers interested to support the costs of NBHA.Flag
-
191
Name: Kc Talia on Jan 14, 2013Comments: This would be so nice!! I sure hope it happens!!Flag
-
192
Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013Comments: Disagree - some WV NBHA dsitricts have co-sanctioned shows but we cannot combine classes and they are to have the other classes after NBHA classes. They may have a two day event and have the co-sanctioned group the next day.Flag
-
193
Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013Comments: Disagree - some WV NBHA dsitricts have co-sanctioned shows but we cannot combine classes and they are to have the other classes after NBHA classes. They may have a two day event and have the co-sanctioned group the next day.Flag
-
194
Name: Robyn Adair on Jan 14, 2013Comments: Please allow for the combining of classes. It is the best situation for everyone involved, including NBHA.Flag
-
195
Name: Sharyn Sartori on Jan 14, 2013Comments:Flag
-
196
Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013Comments:Flag
-
197
Name: Kristine Witherington on Jan 14, 2013Comments:Flag
-
198
Name: Deb Chilson on Jan 14, 2013Comments: I am for Co-Sanctioned NBHA Shows.Flag
-
199
Name: Jenny Law on Jan 14, 2013Comments:Flag
-
200
Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013Comments:Flag