NEW BRUNSWICK PEOPLES’ DECLARATION ON SHALE GAS AND RENEWABLE ENERGY

Signatures 367 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 › »

1. 151
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 1, 2012

   Comments: There's no fracking way!

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Wendy Clowater on Dec 1, 2012

   Comments: Do what's right and listen to the People.

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Tom Smith on Dec 1, 2012

   Comments: i endorse the principle and application of the concepts put forward in this declaration let's work together to keep new brunswick's environment as healthy as possible now and for our children's futures

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Andrew Brittain on Dec 1, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: George Irving on Dec 1, 2012

   Comments: Water is more important than gas. Human beings need fresh water to live, and they do not need natural gas to live.

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Suzanne Irving on Dec 1, 2012

   Comments: Shale gas revenues are not going to make politicians spend money any smarter so what is the point. The costs out weight the benefits.

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Howard Gould on Dec 1, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Kayleigh on Dec 1, 2012

   Comments: Don't talk dollars if you aren't talking sense!

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Jo-Ann Bennett on Dec 1, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Therese Dupuis on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: Our so-called Democratic Government allied with the big companies is walking over NB citizens with this shale-gas deal. There is absolutely no benefits for us in this experimental fracking, no matter how you look at it. To put our water and our environment, meaning OUR HEALTH, through that risk is absolutely ridiculous if it was a Government representing us. We're talking about non-reversible damages!! But I guess our Government is not representing the people of NB. ...I guess that common sense is not so common in Fredericton. Another one-term Government!

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Gloria Shoeman on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Tyler McCready on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Izmael Goguen on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: Don't destroyThis beautiful province with this. There are better ways of doing things.

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: BERNETTE SURETTE on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: LEONARD GOGUEN on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Amy MacPherson on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Robert Taylor on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: not happy about the complete disregard for our oppinions! no thanks shale gas

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Manon Cormier on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: not interested in shale gas and its risks

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Shelley Swift on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: Environment first!

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Monique Thebeau on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Jeannette Gaudet on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Susan Wall on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Gwen McCarthy on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Julian Renaud on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Darrin Moran on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: There has to be a safer way without sacrificing the environment.

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Robert McIvor on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Nadine Ives on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: We need to focus on energy solutions that are sustainable (economically, environmentally, socially) and affordable, rather than grasping at straws as is the current approach re. shale gas. We are NOT a 'have not' province - we have a wealth of talent, brains and RENEWABLE resources that can be developed, so let's get on with it!

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Leon Hebert on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: This practice is a flagrant lack of respect towards earth, water, air, nature and humanity. We have great potential for wind energy in New-Brunswick, which could heat our homes with very little environmental impact forever. We do not need to put everything at risk with this aberrant practice, there's other alternatives. Let OUR government balance the wealth by taxing the wealthy, not by lowering the life quality of its people.

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: a clean sustainable water supply is priceless. are we really going to put a price$ on our health and our future generations health? + big oil companies will be profiting off our despair... WTF Why dont they frack&poison their own land, not the peoples!

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Jordan Hallett on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: No shale gas please!

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Jenifer Jobbins on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: The process of fracturing for shale gas is damaging to the natural environment and aquifer systems, and will itgreatly undermine our property values. This means that we will suffer permanently for the short term benefit of others, because the gas extracted by these means will run out -- and probably sooner than later. The government and energy companies should be investing in renewables.

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Stan Moeller on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: A healthy environment and particularly good water are far more important than gas and oil extraction.

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: John Alward on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: LindaTurgeon on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments: No amount of fines paid by the gas companies will bring back our water once it is contaminated.Fracking is just not safe!!

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Della Webster on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Clyde Hicks on Dec 2, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Dave Rawding on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Theresa Rawding on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Gwen McCarthy on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Lester C. Little on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: We should put a real value on our fresh water, clean air, etc we now enjoy. We should contact areas that have already lost their clean environment by fracking and ask them what the cost will be to put their environment back to normal. How long might it take. We must have these real costs to balance against the gains as the costs must be paid by someone.

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Trish Noms Skittles Augustine on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Jordan Augustine on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Shawna Sanipass on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: Say no to shale gas

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Heather Staples on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Heather Staples on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Willi Nolan on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Lynn Hartt on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Matthew G. Merrett on Dec 3, 2012

    Comments: Prove to us, you care!

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 › »