NEW BRUNSWICK PEOPLES’ DECLARATION ON SHALE GAS AND RENEWABLE ENERGY

Signatures 368 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 8 › »

1. 101
   Name: Daniel Bull on Nov 30, 2012

   Comments: Shale gas is and has always been dangerous. Don't be fooled! Of course the gas company will say otherwise. They want to profit. Don't let that profit be at the expense of NB health and safety.

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Julia Irving on Nov 30, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Mary Beth Watt on Nov 30, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Jay Rawding on Nov 30, 2012

   Comments: Absolutely deplorable that NB is falling hook, line, and sucker for this non-renewable, non-sustainable, environmentally damaging industry that has ruined communities all over the world. The assumption is that a province owned by a gas and oil company should welcome fracking with open arms. In order to force that backwards mentality, it has meant ignoring and suppressing the very vocal majority of dissent that has been expressed. NO SHALE GAS. PERIOD. NO REGULATORY DOCUMENTS CAN ADDRESS THE SCOPE AND UNPREDICTABLE IMPACTS OF THIS LOATHSOME INDUSTRY.

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Pierre Cyr on Nov 30, 2012

   Comments: Theres no money to be made here. Look into shale oil mining instead using only steam.

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Catherine Doucet on Nov 30, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Winnie McKee on Nov 30, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Robert Valiquette on Nov 30, 2012

   Comments: NB government (present and future governments) to govern for the people of NB (their employers) and not for industry first. We are not afraid of progress and economical growth as long as it does not include the destruction of everyone's health and well being as a price for this growth.

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Keith Ruttan on Nov 30, 2012

   Comments: I am completely opposed to hydrafracturing as a means to retrieve natural gas from the ground. Stop Poisoning our water systems with this method!

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Bernadette Arsenault on Nov 30, 2012

    Comments: We have to think of our children's and grandchildren's future.

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Renata Woodward on Nov 30, 2012

    Comments: Please do not destroy this beautiful province!

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 30, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Marco Durepos on Nov 30, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Renee Desjardins on Nov 30, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Bailey Desjardins on Nov 30, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Jane McCulloch on Nov 30, 2012

    Comments: Damaging the environment and putting our water at risk is just not worth the short term gain

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Deanna Davis on Nov 30, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Denis Doucet on Nov 30, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Daniel Leger on Nov 30, 2012

    Comments: It sickens me to my stomach that the government is contemplating this instead of tidal energy. Elizabeth May was on CBC's Shift program and clearly stated the technology is proven and is available - here we sit geographically on the Bay of Fundy and the highest tides in the world - free energy and instead the government wants to bring this. SHAME ON YOU.

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Caroline Meyer on Nov 30, 2012

    Comments: I cannot imagine the morality behind knowingly damaging the local earth of this province, the documented effects of which so far reaching when we have a tremendous resource of coastal tides...let us be innovative instead of disastrously shortsighted, let us harness tidal power, let us preserve our water, our animals, our health. Let us be forward thinking!

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Ruth Wolpin on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: One fifth of the province's land including our richest farmland is leased for shale gas exploration. Permanent contamination of our food production area will plunge New Brunswick into a spiraling state of poverty. Pennsylvania which is experiencing heavy drilling for shale gas is currently experiencing a severe economic downturn.

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Penny Kollar on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: There is no such thing as safe fracking. Lets get on top of green energy.

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Francine McClure on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Patricia McCulloch on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: Bravo!

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Rob Moir on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Trish Wallace-Basque on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Liz Kramer on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Shelly Estey on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Shelly Estey on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Mark Furlong on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: if natural gas were so valuable, the Irving refinery would not just burn it off as gas flares because of it being "too expensive to capture", and it is NOT clean, it is only CLEANER than other fossil fuels. the gas isn't going anywhere, so figure out a safe way to extract it and maybe the market price will actually go up by then. NO FRACKING!!!

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Brian Cleveland on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Isabelle Simard on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Chrystal Stewart on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Mark D'Arcy on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: Those politicians and corporations who are against equitable taxes, local economies, and renewable energy are the "radicals". They must get out of the way. The people are going to save this planet for their children and grandchildren.

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Nadine Donovan on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: Please don't destroy our province by allowing this incredibly invasive practice into our region of the world. Our environment can't take it.

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Christine Chase on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Sherry Coffey on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: I do not believe this industry will provide the jobs insiders say it will; I do not believe hydrofracking can be done safely; I believe the risks outweigh the gains of this industry; I believe we need to transition now to greener energy.

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Jane Gillies on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Sarah Boucher on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Sherri Schultz on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Elise D'Arcy on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Aaron Daigle on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: Sharon Levesque on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: Hope everyone signs this petition.

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Nick Brown on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Eric Viau on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: The people have spoken. I am happy to be serving presently in Afghanistan for the right for people to speak out. Alward, are you listening?

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Susan Murphy on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: I'm tired of hearing that opponents to shale gas development are simply being emotional. The knowledge that my property could be devalued; the thought that many well-educated professionals that I know are talking seriously about leaving this province, are issues that do make me emotional. But neither of these concerns comes close to the emotions I felt when helicoptors and thumper trucks, driven for the most part by out-of-province employees, began to invade the area in which I live without my consent, or the consent of fellow New Brunswickers.

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: John D. Smith on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: Dear Government of New Brunswick, Simply stated when you authorize companies to fracture the ground water containment structures that hold, channel and nurture Canada's water supply - the act will damage all life forms within the effected eco-system. This is not only not prudent, but it is not morally right. The humans should not be containminating the life blood of other species. It is simpy wrong to containmenate ground water. Please reject this 'fracking' initiative. Sincerely and thoughtfully, John D. Smith Thornhill, Ontario, Canada

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: France has the biggest shale gas reserve in Europe. Despite their abyssal debt, they refuse to start exploration until a safe way to extract shale gas will be found. What does the NB gov know that France does not???!!!

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Hannah Campbell on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Terry Wishart on Dec 1, 2012

    Comments: People are beginning to make their voices heard. They are coming to understand with more clarity that many of our politicians as well as the shale gas industry and its myriad of special interests in both public and private sectors, are determined to place their futures in deep jeopardy, given our size and the types of geology we have in the drilling lease areas. Maybe People in New Brunswick are prepared to step out of their comfort zone to genuinely work to put this province on a more progressive path than the one David Alward has in mind.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 8 › »