Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 2219 total

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 45 »

  1. 151
    Name: Mike Wilson on Feb 24, 2004
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  2. 152
    Name: Erik Torgerson on Feb 24, 2004
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 153
    Name: David Goldsmith on Feb 24, 2004
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 154
    Name: Barry Franklin on Feb 24, 2004
    State: TN
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 155
    Name: Jon Kimmich on Feb 24, 2004
    State: WA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 156
    Name: Christopher McGraw on Feb 24, 2004
    State: WA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 157
    Name: Wes Donahue on Feb 24, 2004
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: I want Smartphone 2003 on my MPx200!
    Flag
  8. 158
    Name: Kevin Wheeler on Feb 24, 2004
    State: VA
    Country: US
    Comments: The next version of this phone will offer bluetooth and a camera. Neither of which I'm interested in. An upgrade to Windows mobile 2003 will satisfy my needs and keep me in good company with ATTwireless. I hope AT&T lives up their name.
    Flag
  9. 159
    Name: Dana Miron on Feb 24, 2004
    State: GA
    Country: US
    Comments: IF ATT does not stand behind it's products and services, then I can't commit to being a long term ATT customer.
    Flag
  10. 160
    Name: Andrew Brown on Feb 24, 2004
    State: GA
    Country: US
    Comments: I want Windows Mobile 2003 for my MPx200.
    Flag
  11. 161
    Name: Jupiter Kajiwara on Feb 24, 2004
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 162
    Name: Travis August on Feb 24, 2004
    State: WV
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 163
    Name: George Moody on Feb 24, 2004
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments: I want smartphone 2003!
    Flag
  14. 164
    Name: Dan MacGregor on Feb 24, 2004
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 165
    Name: Justin Youens on Feb 24, 2004
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments: We can not run .NET programs on this very $$ phone. I signed a 2 year agreement for something that can't be upgraded Please.
    Flag
  16. 166
    Name: Glenn Hassert on Feb 24, 2004
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 167
    Name: Christopher Rabel on Feb 24, 2004
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 168
    Name: Robert Herrera on Feb 24, 2004
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 169
    Name: John Anadiotis on Feb 24, 2004
    State: CO
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 170
    Name: Aaron Crosby on Feb 24, 2004
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: Please provide the upgrade, even if it should require money to purchase.
    Flag
  21. 171
    Name: Chad Reichenbach on Feb 24, 2004
    State: AZ
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 172
    Name: Cesar Camacho on Feb 24, 2004
    State: VA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 173
    Name: Rajkumar Mohanram on Feb 24, 2004
    State: WA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 174
    Name: Paul Conradt on Feb 24, 2004
    State: WA
    Country: US
    Comments: We need to be given the firmware upgrade to Mobile 2003. AT&T sold an outdated phone that has several bugs. We have the right to get the upgrade for FREE.
    Flag
  25. 175
    Name: Jorge Vidal on Feb 24, 2004
    State: FL
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 176
    Name: Bob Wit on Feb 24, 2004
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 177
    Name: Hector Velez on Feb 24, 2004
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 178
    Name: Brian Tuberty on Feb 24, 2004
    State: PA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 179
    Name: Ayaz Siddiqui on Feb 24, 2004
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 180
    Name: Chris Diquinzioc on Feb 24, 2004
    State: NJ
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 181
    Name: Wayne Allen on Feb 24, 2004
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 182
    Name: Dean Duensing on Feb 24, 2004
    State: CO
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 183
    Name: Greg Van Dyke on Feb 24, 2004
    State: GA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 184
    Name: Ryan Malhoski on Feb 24, 2004
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 185
    Name: Michael Worley on Feb 24, 2004
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 186
    Name: Mark Wawers on Feb 24, 2004
    State: IL
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 187
    Name: Hakeem Odulate on Feb 24, 2004
    State: IL
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 188
    Name: Dennis Haygood on Feb 25, 2004
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments: given the basic features that were screwed up by ATT's tweaks, the least ATT can do is provide us the upgrade to SmartPhone 2003!
    Flag
  39. 189
    Name: Kevin Ward on Feb 25, 2004
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 190
    Name: H Ji on Feb 25, 2004
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 191
    Name: Nitin Jain on Feb 25, 2004
    State: IL
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 192
    Name: Steven Li on Feb 25, 2004
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: mpx200 owner. Love the phone. Customers First!
    Flag
  43. 193
    Name: Chris Ullrich on Feb 25, 2004
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 194
    Name: Casey Siens on Feb 25, 2004
    State: CO
    Country: US
    Comments: I would like to see an upgrade to Smartphone 2003 so I can use 1800 numbers that I currently can't due to AT&T's buggy firmware.
    Flag
  45. 195
    Name: N.J. Follis on Feb 25, 2004
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: I was Promised by the AT&T sales rep that I would be able to upgrade my phone when 2003 was made available. I would not have purchased the phone without this assurance.
    Flag
  46. 196
    Name: Timothy Enriquez on Feb 25, 2004
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 197
    Name: Norm Ringgold on Feb 25, 2004
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: As an IT Manager in charge of global cell phones for NetManage Inc. I would be disappointed in Moto if it does not support these very new phones with the latest OS version. I would have little faith in future Moto purchaes if this were true and the mpx200 was abandoned!
    Flag
  48. 198
    Name: Tim Tsai on Feb 25, 2004
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 199
    Name: Rosa Azurdia on Feb 25, 2004
    State: LA
    Country: US
    Comments: please we need this update
    Flag
  50. 200
    Name: Marcus Pankey on Feb 25, 2004
    State: OR
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 45 »

Sponsored links