Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 2219 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 45 › »

  1. 1
    Name: Sean Murphy on Feb 24, 2004
    State: NY
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Chris Kalcovski on Feb 24, 2004
    State:
    Country: CA
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Peter Vorametsanti on Feb 24, 2004
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Shawn Taing on Feb 24, 2004
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: it is time...
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Naeem Uddin on Feb 24, 2004
    State: WA
    Country: US
    Comments: We should get an update for mpx200 for windows mobile 2003
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Paris Constantzos on Feb 24, 2004
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: John Dang on Feb 24, 2004
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: JASON BURROUGHS on Feb 24, 2004
    State: CT
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Dean Roberts on Feb 24, 2004
    State: MI
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: John Rodriguez on Feb 24, 2004
    State: NV
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Wilfredo Melendez on Feb 24, 2004
    State: PA
    Country: US
    Comments: i want an upgrade
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Jared Hughston on Feb 24, 2004
    State: AZ
    Country: US
    Comments: Give us what we need.
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Maritza Santiago on Feb 24, 2004
    State: PA
    Country: US
    Comments: I want an upgrade, i deserve an upgrade after 3 mpx200 phone replacements because of bad hardware/software
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Satish Patel on Feb 24, 2004
    State: PA
    Country: US
    Comments: It will be unethical if AT&T does not provide the upgrade to its users,, just to support operations of motorola
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Donald Giordano on Feb 24, 2004
    State: PA
    Country: US
    Comments: Purchased MPx200 from AT&T 2/23/04.
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: John Cavnar-Johnson on Feb 24, 2004
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Ryan Mlejnek on Feb 24, 2004
    State: WI
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Travis Hankins on Feb 24, 2004
    State: CO
    Country: US
    Comments: Let us have the Win. Mobile 2003 update for our phone!
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Travis Hankins on Feb 24, 2004
    State: CO
    Country: US
    Comments: Let us have the Win. Mobile 2003 update for our phone!
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Charles Ishimoto on Feb 24, 2004
    State: HI
    Country: US
    Comments: 2002 in 2003 Hopefullly something updated to 2004 operational capabilities would be warranted.
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Boris Nisenbaum on Feb 24, 2004
    State: NJ
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Thomas Clark on Feb 24, 2004
    State: CO
    Country: US
    Comments: The longer I keep my phone, the longer you have my business. If you don't upgrade my phone it will become obsolete and I will switch to the company with the latest and the greatest. If I am willing to pay for this phone, your cancellation fee means nothing to me. Let's see what you are willing to do to keep my business.
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Mike Hanley on Feb 24, 2004
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: I would never have been purchased the phone if I had known that the SmartPhone 2003 OS would not be available. The .NET support is critical and if it is not available, the phone is not worth it.
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Chris Marts on Feb 24, 2004
    State: DE
    Country: US
    Comments: Love the mpx200! Would love to have existing quirks fixed with a ROM update plus the new features. Will buy one with Bluetooth/WiFi, too at some point, don't worry!
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Jeremy Blosser on Feb 24, 2004
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Ramin Perumal on Feb 24, 2004
    State: MI
    Country: US
    Comments: Motorola & AT&T Wireless absolutely must release a Windows Mobile 2003 upgrade for the MPx200. I want to be able to access .NET Web Services on my Motorola MPx200 today. It's already 2004 and I can't imagine why we're forced to continue using Smartphone 2002!
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Joseph Helou on Feb 24, 2004
    State: NY
    Country: US
    Comments: For once maybe attws will stay true to there customers
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Mansoom Lee on Feb 24, 2004
    State: NY
    Country: US
    Comments: Don't forget the outrageous data plans... :)
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Thomas Carstensen on Feb 24, 2004
    State: ID
    Country: US
    Comments: please provide an smartphone 2003 upgrade
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Ozgur Altun on Feb 24, 2004
    State:
    Country: TR
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Amit Kalra on Feb 24, 2004
    State: IL
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Steven Braswell on Feb 24, 2004
    State: OH
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Erik Beckmann on Feb 24, 2004
    State: AZ
    Country: US
    Comments: The Mpx200 needs this upgrade please provide us with the support you promise!
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Brian Vallelunga on Feb 24, 2004
    State: DC
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Julian Rosenberg on Feb 24, 2004
    State: MD
    Country: US
    Comments: Great phone. Let's make it even better.
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Ramin Perumal on Feb 24, 2004
    State: MI
    Country: US
    Comments: AT&T Wireless and Motorola absolutely must release a Windows Mobile 2003 upgrade for the AT&T Wireless co-branded Motorola MPx200 Smartphone. I want to access .NET Web Services on my Windows Mobile Smartphone today. I can't do this with Smartphone 2002 (which does not support the .NET Compact Framework). Why are we still being forced to use Smartphone 2002 in 2004
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Michael Brandenburg on Feb 24, 2004
    State: WI
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Matt Stuemky on Feb 24, 2004
    State: CA
    Country: US
    Comments: Just do it AT&T!
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Don Sidler on Feb 24, 2004
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Vern Mcp on Feb 24, 2004
    State: OR
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Jonathan Lichtenfels on Feb 24, 2004
    State: MA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: TERRY LATHAM on Feb 24, 2004
    State: TN
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Geof Schlakman on Feb 24, 2004
    State: FL
    Country: US
    Comments: I am hopeful that this is all an over-reaction to the slow release of 2003, it would make no sense to have an upgradable OS and not provide upgrades.
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Dan Varkey on Feb 24, 2004
    State: TX
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Dustin Bowman on Feb 24, 2004
    State: PA
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Sean Lavery on Feb 24, 2004
    State:
    Country:
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Daniel Jensen on Feb 24, 2004
    State: VA
    Country: US
    Comments: I agree 100%
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Teri DeClairville on Feb 24, 2004
    State: MN
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Jeff Edelstein on Feb 24, 2004
    State: NJ
    Country: US
    Comments:
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Thad Sayre on Feb 24, 2004
    State: AL
    Country: US
    Comments: Providing 2002 OS when I purchased the phone in 2004 is unexcepable. After all one advantage of a Windows based device is the ability to upgrade.
    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 45 › »

Sign Petition Now!

Sponsored links