Signatures 27 total
Page: 1
-
1
Name: Krista Ellingson on Feb 7, 2013Comments: Great work Ben!Flag
-
2
Name: Ben Knaus on Feb 7, 2013Comments: Constantly we are asked "why we need assault rifles" I wasn't aware of a bill of wants or needs but a bill of RIGHTS."Flag
-
3
Name: Ron Knaus on Feb 7, 2013Comments: Shall not be InfringedbFlag
-
4
Name: Anonymous on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Anonymous on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Jay Jaffe on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Jennifer Black-Allen on Feb 7, 2013Comments: I strongly urge Gov. Dayton to stand by his March 5, 2012 veto letter regarding gun control. Where his position was one of protecting the 2nd Amendment and didn't see where any additional gun laws would be necessary. I am disheartened that he could take such a drastic change in opinion and willingly push to infringe upon our Constitutional Rights. Along with the authors of these outrageous bills, I see violations of their oaths!Flag
-
8
Name: Erik Eshom on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Ted Zipoy on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Marc Olivier on Feb 7, 2013Comments: Elements of *most* of the gun control bills heard in Committee this month violate Article 1, Sections 7-11 of the Minnesota State Constitution concerning due process and bills of attainder; they also violate the U.S. Constitution concerning the 2nd 4th, 5th, 9th, 10th, and 14th Amendments, violating matters addressed in these separate and collected amendments. These bills are Unconstitutional Official Acts and as such need to be dropped, and not signed.Flag
-
11
Name: Randall Ruhland on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: Troy Huschle on Feb 7, 2013Comments: I served my country for these freedoms.Flag
-
13
Name: Michael Darren Black on Feb 7, 2013Comments: If these bills are signed into law I will vote republican in the next election.Flag
-
14
Name: Anonymous on Feb 7, 2013Comments:Flag
-
15
Name: Dennis Marquedant on Feb 7, 2013Comments: I'll keep my guns thanks!Flag
-
16
Name: Isaiah Ehlinger on Feb 8, 2013Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Aaron Buck on Feb 8, 2013Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Anonymous on Feb 8, 2013Comments: Such true words about our "needs" regarding 20-30 rounds magazines. It is not about our needs, it's called the Bill of RIGHTS. It really bothers me that the police officers are carrying fully automatic rifles with that capacity when we face the same threats they do, generally before they do.Flag
-
19
Name: Sheryl Burns on Feb 8, 2013Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Aaron Buck on Feb 9, 2013Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Kevin Vick on Feb 9, 2013Comments:Flag
-
22
Name: Anthony Hahn on Feb 10, 2013Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Roger Parras on Feb 10, 2013Comments: Uphold our Constitution. These bills we saw in committee in the House are not common sense proposals!Flag
-
24
Name: Jason Pierson on Feb 10, 2013Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Derek Schmitt on Feb 12, 2013Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: Bryce Galle on Feb 13, 2013Comments: We can come up with better solutions. Limiting a law abiding citizen from owning any currently legal firearm should not be one. Solve a local problem on a local level, not state wide.Flag
-
27
Name: Diane & John Black on Feb 19, 2013Comments:Flag
Page: 1