Signatures 475 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 10 › »

1. 151
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 3, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Kate Lowrey on Nov 4, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Martin Straker on Nov 4, 2011

   Comments: We will support you as much as we can

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Ken Baxter on Nov 4, 2011

   Comments: This would be a series of blots on a great landscape. Long term damage to unspoilt land, rare wildlife and a disturbing shadow on a lovely part of Northumberland.

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Pat Baxter on Nov 4, 2011

   Comments: A short term financial gain for Elsdon against a long term destruction for our area. This must not happen.

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Janice Fenwick on Nov 4, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Mick Fenwick on Nov 4, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Joanne Chakal on Nov 4, 2011

   Comments: blot on the landscape, good campaign!!

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Ray Baxter on Nov 5, 2011

   Comments: Is there nothing sacred ?

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Hugh Curn on Nov 5, 2011

    Comments: The location is inappropriate considering the many alternatives that are available

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Jon Baxter on Nov 5, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Laura Martin on Nov 5, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Pete Grant on Nov 5, 2011

    Comments: I'm opposed to my tax money being wasted on inadequate solutions for our future energy requirements. I don't want monuments to Britain's asinine energy policy to be visible all over the beautiful Northumberland countryside. http://nuclearfissionary.com/2010/04/02/comparing-energy-costs-of-nuclear-coal-gas-wind-and-solar/

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Pauline Lovelock on Nov 5, 2011

    Comments: Another bunch of money grabbing bastards!

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Doug Brown on Nov 6, 2011

    Comments: There are many other renewable energy alternatives to huge turbines... such as solar power, hydro power and others... Leave the countryside as it is, and think differently!

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Lisa Johnson on Nov 7, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Rachel Lowrey on Nov 8, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Alan Lowrey on Nov 8, 2011

    Comments: How much more? Widdrington, Fenrother, Butterwell, Stobswood, Blagdon, Lynemouth and now Elsdon. We are the dumping ground for the rest of the Kingdom. The southeast prospers, the Welsh get handouts, the Scottish get an unfair subsidy system the Northern Irish are placated with anything to stop them fighting. We in the Northeast are made redundant, our industries are shut down we are not even good enough to have a dual carriageway through the county and to cap it all the Coldstream Guards are to be disbanded, may I had, the Coldstreamer’s were chosen so as not to cause offence to the other parts of the UK who have Guards regiments. We are however suitable as the rubbish dump for all the Nimby's in the kingdom. Why not concentrate on solar panels, they are efficient, they do not have the same effect on the environment as wind turbines do and are virtually invisible from a distance. A little common sense and forward planning would be better than feeding Wind farm fat cats money.

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Robin Thompson on Nov 10, 2011

    Comments: Keep Northumberland clean/green and free to be seen

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Tim Pinkney on Nov 10, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Robert Handyside on Nov 10, 2011

    Comments: Totally inappropriate in this location. Totally unreliable and inefficient in any location.

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Paul Graham on Nov 11, 2011

    Comments: Its bad enough that there seems to be a ministry for spoiling scenic views but when it comes to the grand vast vista to the Cheviots from the A696 being destroyed because of governmental commitment to very dubious devices, then its enough and as a county we already have enough!

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Susan Killick on Nov 11, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: David Venus on Nov 12, 2011

    Comments: Another example of the Northumberland Garden of Eden being turned into an industrial estate by greedy landowners and businesses..

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Eileen Elliott on Nov 12, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Ken Davison on Nov 12, 2011

    Comments: Another blot on the landscape. Leave our beautiful countryside alone.

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: James Lunn on Nov 13, 2011

    Comments: This non UK based company plans to destory our historic county - they must be stopped

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Adrian Don on Nov 14, 2011

    Comments: When I visit Elsdon, Winters Gibbet and the surrounding hills I feel as if I'm transported back in time. It's unspoilt. Don't spoil it.

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Christine Goodwin on Nov 14, 2011

    Comments: I fully support this petition. Preserving our landscape heritage for future generations is more important than greed and profit in the present. The huge investment and government subsidies involved do not justify the very questionable and dubious benefits in terms of 'sustainable energy.' The money would be better spent on research into alternative sources.

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Richard Moran on Nov 15, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Andrew Rogers on Nov 15, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 15, 2011

    Comments: This is yet another example of corporate greed; it is inappropriate in scale & siting & will do nothing to halt climate change; the promoters have deep pockets which need lining!

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Margaret Isobel Beech on Nov 16, 2011

    Comments: I am very oppossed to this wind farm, and believe it will distroy the open views and beauty of this area of Northumberland. The proposed very large turbines will be able to be seen as you enter Northumberland National Park from Scotland and from many other vantage points throughout the National Park and our beautiful unspoilt(as yet) Northumberland. One of Britains stunning places of natural beauty, space, sky and haven for wildlife. They are also going to be very close to some hamlets and it seems from what I have read about the companies intentions that no real consideration has been giving to any of these factors it is just about making money for landowners and the company involved even more than producing green energy. Their comments have been unbelievable and un informed.

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Chris Kilkenny on Nov 16, 2011

    Comments: Good luck to you.My Arkle family tree has its roots in Elsdon.

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Patrick Brennand on Nov 16, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Alison Brennand on Nov 16, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Alison Brennand on Nov 16, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Anthony Brennand on Nov 16, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 16, 2011

    Comments: We must stop this desecration of our countryside.

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Catherine Brennand on Nov 16, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Jonathan Anderson on Nov 16, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Lyndsay Walsh on Nov 17, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Beck Tait on Nov 17, 2011

    Comments: stop this madness

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Nicola Tait on Nov 17, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Brendan Evans on Nov 17, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Sara Morgan on Nov 17, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Jane Anderson on Nov 17, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: David Williams on Nov 17, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Susan Wilson on Nov 18, 2011

    Comments: Im a member of Middleton burn action group supporting your cause.

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Bruce Gibson on Nov 18, 2011

    Comments: This development would be a disaster for the National Park boundary. This is an area of staggering beauty and to allow these enormous turbines would show that you simply don't care for the environment.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 10 › »