Signatures 475 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 10 › »

1. 101
   Name: Tony Lawson on Oct 1, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Leonard Harbottle on Oct 2, 2011

   Comments: Simply must be stopped!

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Tracey Joan Harbottle on Oct 2, 2011

   Comments: Over my dead body!!

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Rachel Robson on Oct 2, 2011

   Comments: I can't believe people want to ruin our amazing landscapes.

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Claire Evans on Oct 2, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Helen Tait on Oct 3, 2011

   Comments: It is a disgrace that's anyone would even consider these huge monstrosities so close to the national park.

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Bryan Mullan on Oct 3, 2011

   Comments: Don't knacker the scenery

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Mrs Sheila Robson on Oct 3, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Sammantha Olek on Oct 3, 2011

   Comments: It's about time our planners grew some nuts and threw these idiots back to where they belong. How dare Chris Huhne suggest we oop North learn to love these monstrosities when he would not consider it in his constituency - and comparing a 125m industrial turbine to a 80 foot 17th century windmill shows just about the level of his grasp on the subject. We will fight you, and we will fight you all the way. Let's hope our regional councilors and planning authority are with the people who pay their wages.

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Gilbert Roberts on Oct 3, 2011

    Comments: I vigorously oppose this development. No doubt a landscape architect will be paid handsomely to say that the turbines are comfortably accommodated by the landscape. The truth is they will ruin some of our most valued vistas for the sake of highly dubious contributions to energy security or carbon reduction.

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Anna Scott on Oct 3, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Michael Shaw on Oct 3, 2011

    Comments: Simply basing an impact assessment on the number of nearby residents shows how little this developer understands about the amenity of rural open space to surrounding communities and how their use of such space feeds the local economy. This is one of my favorite cycle routes due to the unspoiled open vistas. I have friends and family who ride and walk in the same area for the same reasons. Northumberland is already over exploited for wind and water.

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Vida Conway on Oct 4, 2011

    Comments: it should be unthinkable to consider allowing such development in a beautiful and historic landscape such as this, and would be detrimental to the loval economy. Currently we visit the area regularly several times a year.

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Jes Conway on Oct 4, 2011

    Comments: I was in the area for a week this summer - totally inappropriate site for such a development, will spoil it for future generations

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: C.J. LEYLAND on Oct 6, 2011

    Comments: I am a neighbour of the Middleton Burn proposal We need to keep in touch see our website www.middletonburnactiongroup.co.uk 0166821395 Chris

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Val Corbett on Oct 6, 2011

    Comments: If I may quote the Duke of Northumberland: "Wind farms divide communities, ruin landscapes, affect tourism, make a minimal contribution to our energy needs and a negligible contribution towards reducing CO2 emissions. The landowner and developer are enriched while the consumer is impoverished by higher energy costs. Turbines are ugly, noisy and completely out of place in our beautiful, historic landscape".

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Kelly Southwick on Oct 8, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Rosie Mould on Oct 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: John Bardgett on Oct 10, 2011

    Comments: Desecration of a beautiful landscape

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Pauline Biggs on Oct 11, 2011

    Comments: No more wind turbines in Northumberland.

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Chris Jowsey on Oct 11, 2011

    Comments: An appalling proposal - it must not be allowed to go ahead!

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Les on Oct 13, 2011

    Comments: This historic location provides some of the finest views in Northumberland. It is disgusting that an industrial wind power station is even being considered here.

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Georgina Leyland on Oct 15, 2011

    Comments: Too many comments to make.. tragically it boils down to one word.... SCAM

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Katy Simmance on Oct 16, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Paul Findlay on Oct 17, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: James Lunn on Oct 17, 2011

    Comments: Northumbweland must have a moritorium on wind turbines. Nothing as destructive to our local environment has happened since the industrial revolution. We MUST portect our historic county. You have my full support

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Gemma Lunn on Oct 17, 2011

    Comments: There are far too many wind farm proprosals in Northumberland. The land owners and developers seem to have no regard for the local communities and beautiful countryside that they destroy with these monstrosities.

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 20, 2011

    Comments: NIMBY.

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Nicola Shaw on Oct 21, 2011

    Comments: I note that the owner of this site, mP in the south of england is opposing a windfarm in the area in which he lives.

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Bryan Gardner on Oct 23, 2011

    Comments: This development is so short sighted and so destructive that it amounts to simple, arrogant vandalism which is part of a frightening despoilation of Britain's landscape and heritage.

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Victoria Clarke on Nov 2, 2011

    Comments: We cannot let this happen to Elsdon!! Anything I can do to help, please let me know

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Guy Rayner on Nov 2, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Chris Willits on Nov 2, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Debbie Scott on Nov 2, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Erin Foster on Nov 2, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Elizabeth Willits on Nov 2, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Danielle Embleton on Nov 2, 2011

    Comments: Please stop this!

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Danielle Embleton on Nov 2, 2011

    Comments: Please stop this!

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Jenny Peng Gillender on Nov 2, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Chris Johnson on Nov 2, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: David Best on Nov 2, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: David Best on Nov 2, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: David Best on Nov 2, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Alexandra Craig on Nov 2, 2011

    Comments: I am opposed to this development being built, it will affect the natural, beautiful landscape of Northumberland and effect the residential areas.

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Elaine Patrick on Nov 2, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Dario Neri on Nov 3, 2011

    Comments: The economic viability of these monstrosities would be non exsistent without government grants. It is the taxpayer who are subsidising these wind farms and lining the pockets of specualtors

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Jill Dalkin on Nov 3, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Wendy Leighton on Nov 3, 2011

    Comments: Absolutely appaling!!!

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 3, 2011

    Comments: Enough is enough. For sheer inefficiency, you'd have to go a long way to match wind energy!

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Sandra Hennis on Nov 3, 2011

    Comments: Large ugly industrial structures have no place in areas of natural beauty. I visit the area for the unspoilt views and to enjoy being in the countryside, a development such as this would destroy that. The damage this proposal would cause to the local area is unproportional to any benefit gained and it should not be allowed to go ahead.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 10 › »