Microhousing Resolution

Signatures 658 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, ... 14 › »

1. 401
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 27, 2012

   Comments: I live next to an Apodment, I previously e-mailed the city council and the mayor with my concerns and objections, I was ignored ! Count me in, and contact me if there is something I can do to move this forward. In addition, I'd like to see this as an issue in the upcoming election to make sure we know how each candidate weighs in (remember the CAP inititiative back in the 80's ? ) thanks, keep it up.

   Flag
2. 402
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 27, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 403
   Name: Susan Porterfield on Dec 27, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 404
   Name: Claude A. Soudah on Dec 27, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 405
   Name: Melissa O'Hearn on Dec 28, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 406
   Name: Kari Olson on Dec 28, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 407
   Name: Bernice Hecker on Dec 28, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 408
   Name: David And Jannie Spain on Dec 28, 2012

   Comments: We hope that Seattle City Council will consider our request for an interim moratorium until further impact studies are done.

   Flag
9. 409
   Name: George Wagner on Dec 28, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 410
    Name: Gregory Oaksen on Dec 29, 2012

    Comments: We need to be way more thoughtful on how we develope our precious neighborhoods before they are ruined forever.

    Flag
11. 411
    Name: Monica Bell on Dec 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 412
    Name: Amy Doll on Dec 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 413
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 29, 2012

    Comments: Cool!

    Flag
14. 414
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 29, 2012

    Comments: Cool!

    Flag
15. 415
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 416
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 417
    Name: Beva Gall on Dec 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 418
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 419
    Name: James Murray on Dec 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 420
    Name: Neil MacDougall on Dec 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 421
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 422
    Name: Louise Maison on Dec 29, 2012

    Comments: Am against apodmenys on Capitol hill

    Flag
23. 423
    Name: Mary Manzin on Dec 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 424
    Name: Lynne Hoskins on Dec 29, 2012

    Comments: Microhousing is inappropriate for the Eastlake neighborhood and I oppose it.

    Flag
25. 425
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 29, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 426
    Name: Deborah McGowan on Dec 30, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 427
    Name: David M. Calvert on Dec 31, 2012

    Comments: It's take six years to destroy our neighborhood and when the complete what they have started it will be even less livable.

    Flag
28. 428
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 31, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 429
    Name: Kate Rimmer on Dec 31, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 430
    Name: Debra Fulton on Dec 31, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 431
    Name: Mitch Allen on Dec 31, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 432
    Name: Elizabeth Grigg on Dec 31, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 433
    Name: Barbara Little on Jan 1, 2013

    Comments: These apodments will destroy Capitol Hill, especially since this density comes without accomodation for parking. I'd like to see the mayor and the city council members put these buildings in THEIR neighborhoods and not force them on ours.

    Flag
34. 434
    Name: Lucy Traxinger on Jan 2, 2013

    Comments: One of the edits to the existing city code need to provide protection of the solar access of existing dwellings. The solar access dedication to solar panels and gardening, both elements of sustaining a "green city". The gardening should not be excluded from protection in a solar access clause, because it is not a "utility". Many lower and middle income households grow a percentage of their food.

    Flag
35. 435
    Name: Nick Valera on Jan 2, 2013

    Comments: Stop demolishing Seattle's few historical buildings!

    Flag
36. 436
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 3, 2013

    Comments: The "dwelling unit" doesn't take into account the severe lack of parking that already exists on the streets. If the number of planned new units is added we will not be able to accommodate all the new cars. This idea is very unfair to existing residents and the desire to add more units through these apodments must be prevented from clogging what is currently a desireable neighborhood to live but we're quickly getting crowded out.

    Flag
37. 437
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 3, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 438
    Name: Julie Harmer on Jan 3, 2013

    Comments: Capitol Hill is a neighborhood rich with beautiful, historic buildings that inspire so much creativity and love!!!!! I could not imagine this beautiful hill without all the character :)

    Flag
39. 439
    Name: Michael Guittard on Jan 3, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 440
    Name: Farley Harding on Jan 4, 2013

    Comments: What about suing the city?It appears that some of these construction site are illegal.No permits no parking etc

    Flag
41. 441
    Name: Clint Posey on Jan 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 442
    Name: Clint Posey on Jan 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 443
    Name: Erik Birkeland on Jan 5, 2013

    Comments: Apodments should bare their fare share of cost, taxes and parking in our neighborhoods. The 56 units on 13th and John has no parking. Surely many of those residents have cars and it's not fair that the developer has no responsibility to provide a single parking spot for residents or guests. SHAME SHAME SHAME !!!

    Flag
44. 444
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 445
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 446
    Name: Cara Alderson on Jan 6, 2013

    Comments: I am outraged at the speed at which my neighborhood is being ruined by greedy developers without a conscience. Grand old homes are being demolished. Out of character 4-story buildings are being planned to cast shadow on existing buildings and these modern structures do not fit in or compliment the surrounding neighborhood. Parking and traffic are as horrendous as the street surfaces and more vehicles promise to cause further deterioration of our streets. Stop the sardine can trend!

    Flag
47. 447
    Name: Ron Christoffel on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments: I live at 16th and Harrison. Why are you straining so hard to wreck on of the few truly integrated, walkable neighborhoods in Seattle? Want to see the "density" future? Go to Greenwood and 95th.

    Flag
48. 448
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments: The design requirements for new buildings should comply with and compliment the historical architecture of Capitol Hill.

    Flag
49. 449
    Name: Patrick Romero on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 450
    Name: Susan Bellan on Jan 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, ... 14 › »