Microhousing Resolution

Signatures 658 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 14 › »

1. 101
   Name: Joabbie G. Mitchell on Dec 12, 2012

   Comments: I've lived as a renter in Seattle 41 yrs, 35 of which have been on Capitol Hill; I'm in complete agreement with the above petition.

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Joe Foye on Dec 12, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Kevin Davis on Dec 12, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Dr. Lisa Friedli on Dec 12, 2012

   Comments: Please do not let developers override city planning protocol by mislabeling microhousing apartment buildings as townhouses!!

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Katherine L. Bennett on Dec 12, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Michelle Patterson on Dec 12, 2012

   Comments: your work on this issue is highly appreciated.

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: L. William Steil Jr. on Dec 12, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Jeffrey A Tolbert on Dec 12, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Jeffrey Cook on Dec 12, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Kate Johnson on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments: 944 12th Ave E

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: A. Torres on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Anne Praczukowski on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Elizabeth N. Danz on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Jean-jacques Clapie on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Dan Handshue on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments: It is unbelievable to me that Conlin and Sugimura are so dismissive of the property owners, residents and taxpayers of Capitol Hill - the message from both is: unless you are a developer, get lost!

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Laird G. Patterson on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Luis Velez on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Kristina Danilchik on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Isabel Dempster on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: James Patterson on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Liza Schattenkerk on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Rose Oliveira on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Cheri L. Filion on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Steven Trevallee on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments: this lind of affordable houding we DO NOT need. "Apodments" are the tenement housing of the best future

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Susun Hosford on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Rick Woods on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments: Council- please take your legislative and policy obligatons seriously. A known gap in basic planning, and thoughtful policy-setting should not continue while you count complaints. What you tolerate (such as this), you endorse.

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Susan Stanford on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Carol Lehman on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments: I have been directly affected by this loophole in regulation. A house across the street from my apt. building was torn down and is becoming a 40-unit apodment building.What was listed in public files as an 8-unit development, became 40 after the design review. This is clearly a violation of the intention of regulation rules and the city ignores it!!

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Julie Zunker on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Charles Frischer on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments: This growth in apodments is wrong and will be quite destructive to the neighborhood. Please do not allow this to happen.

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Kathleen Ritz on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments: Clarify the meaning of dwelling unit, then update the rules and regs. And please don't dilly dally on this issue. And accept that no rule or regulation will be perfect for all time. Seattle is rapidly growing and developing.

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Brinn Moore on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Mike Marquand on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Lane McCulloch on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Nathan Hendricks on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Ben Harris on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Fiona Black Jackson on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Michael Caputi on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: SUSIE LEE on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Linda S Cody on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments: I am deeply concerned as a homeowner and resident of Capitol Hill on Harvard Avenue E. in Seattle. Apodments and high density studio type multi-dwelling constructions have no place in residential areas that already struggle with overcrowding, lack of on street parking and traffic congestion issues. I am opposed to the development of this housing style and am deeply concerned that there are no processes in place to protect the integrity of the Capitol Hill area.

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Charles A. Johnson, Jr on Dec 13, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 14, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 14 › »