Microhousing Resolution

Signatures 669 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 › »

1. 551
   Name: Carol A. Vigil on Jan 29, 2013

   Comments: YES YES YES

   Flag
2. 552
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 29, 2013

   Comments: We have wonderful neighborhoods with great community - let's keep it that way!

   Flag
3. 553
   Name: Amber Figgat on Jan 29, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 554
   Name: Paula Bamburg on Jan 30, 2013

   Comments: The character of Seattle is all about its neighborhoods and the City's push for too much too soon increase in density is killing the individual identity of Seattle neighborhoods - Queen Anne, Captiol Hill, Weat Seattle, Ballard, Fremont . . .

   Flag
5. 555
   Name: Kerrigan A. Swan on Jan 30, 2013

   Comments: Save our city's history! The recent development boom is a developmental disaster. More micro-homes and condos at outrageous prices are already far in excess... AND empty. It's egregious for short sighted, greedy developers to damage Seattle's history, communities, and future.

   Flag
6. 556
   Name: Paul Best on Jan 31, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 557
   Name: Lisa on Jan 31, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 558
   Name: Jake Warga on Feb 1, 2013

   Comments: please don't make everywhere into a lightless-Belltown corridor.

   Flag
9. 559
   Name: Deanna L. Greek on Feb 3, 2013

   Comments: Please stop building apodments and other high density housing in Capitol Hill. We are already too crowded!

   Flag
10. 560
    Name: Erin Wade on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: if apodments is the future of affordable housing, while ridiculous numbers of overpriced condos and apts. are being overbuilt in capitol hill, the neighborhood and its character will be lost, as well as the ability of its longterm residents to stay here.

    Flag
11. 561
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments: Keep the character of the old neighborhoods; which could be lost so quickly.

    Flag
12. 562
    Name: Anna Forse on Feb 5, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 563
    Name: Stuart Otis Anderson on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments: This is getting riddiculous. Everyone is on the take for an M.U.P. There are ten to twelve 440 volt step down transformers in the ground every block now. There is positive ground saturation. Worse still, the population target market us the most spoiled, never-had-a-job-or-a-sex-partner, to have ever existed. It is like romper room with wrinkles and credit cards. Seattle is not a day care center for the unsuccesseful rude offspring of the Monsanto - Archer Daniels Midland consquest and eviction notices going on nationwide. Let some other city babysit them.

    Flag
14. 564
    Name: Stuart Otis Anderson on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments: This is getting riddiculous. Everyone is on the take for an M.U.P. There are ten to twelve 440 volt step down transformers in the ground every block now. There is positive ground saturation. Worse still, the population target market us the most spoiled, never-had-a-job-or-a-sex-partner, to have ever existed. It is like romper room with wrinkles and credit cards. Seattle is not a day care center for the unsuccesseful rude offspring of the Monsanto - Archer Daniels Midland consquest and eviction notices going on nationwide. Let some other city babysit them.

    Flag
15. 565
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 566
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 10, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 567
    Name: Angie Simmons-Rivera on Feb 10, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 568
    Name: James Crossley on Feb 12, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 569
    Name: Jim Micka on Feb 13, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 570
    Name: Tom Davis on Feb 13, 2013

    Comments: Thanks and please sign me up as a member of Reasonable Density Seattle!

    Flag
21. 571
    Name: Jeremy Knapp on Feb 13, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 572
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 14, 2013

    Comments: The density and demand for housing within the city is pushing up the housing costs (rents) and pushing current residents out of the homes they've occupied for years because they can't afford to live here anymore. This is ridiculous. Unfortunately, I've found there are new people coming in who are ready to pay the price. I wish my employment would keep up with the sky rocketing cost of living in this beautiful city.

    Flag
23. 573
    Name: Michael Ford on Feb 14, 2013

    Comments: It is sad to see so many new housing units being built here in West Seattle and that bus service has gone down hill. We no longer have bus service to shopping for the disabled or our older people living south of the West Seattle Jct anymore yet if you live north you have all the shoping you want or more. To me I find this to not be in line with the ADA and that those planning all of the new building here in Seattle for these groups of people.

    Flag
24. 574
    Name: Brian McGovern on Feb 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 575
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 576
    Name: Rebecca Korth on Feb 16, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 577
    Name: Kristin Stone on Feb 16, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 578
    Name: Tracy Wolfe on Feb 16, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 579
    Name: Barb Bailey on Feb 16, 2013

    Comments: Ballard has lost its charm and now Capital Hill and out in Edmonds--enough is enough

    Flag
30. 580
    Name: Lara Rooke on Feb 17, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 581
    Name: Anne Lyons on Feb 17, 2013

    Comments: This city is allowing Capital Hill to become the tenement neighborhood of tomorrow

    Flag
32. 582
    Name: Kerri Adams on Feb 17, 2013

    Comments: Just do your due diligence city!

    Flag
33. 583
    Name: Dan And Joan Clement on Feb 18, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 584
    Name: Andrew Royal on Feb 18, 2013

    Comments: These are unfair exceptions in the zoning laws that need to be changes ASAP.

    Flag
35. 585
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 18, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 586
    Name: Carmel Pope on Feb 18, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 587
    Name: Michael Egbert on Feb 18, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 588
    Name: Thomas Foster on Feb 19, 2013

    Comments: I am concerned about the demolition of historic residential homes on Capitol Hill in particular. Their removal in order to build 6 story apartment buildings changes the aesthetics of the neighborhood making them monotone and diminishing the visual quality of area. In particular is the lot at 422 Summit Avenue East and the south west corner of Belmont and Republican.

    Flag
39. 589
    Name: Roy Hamrick on Feb 19, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 590
    Name: Erie Jones on Feb 19, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 591
    Name: Mick Lane on Feb 19, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 592
    Name: Jordan Royal on Feb 19, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 593
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 19, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 594
    Name: Julieta Renteria on Feb 20, 2013

    Comments: I would like for this to be considered for the U. district/Tavenna/ Greenlake neighborhoods as well.

    Flag
45. 595
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 596
    Name: Tucker Dacey on Feb 21, 2013

    Comments: I am a concerned Capitol Hill resident!

    Flag
47. 597
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 21, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 598
    Name: Peter Hallam on Feb 21, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 599
    Name: Georgia Hart on Feb 21, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 600
    Name: NICOLE PAGE on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments: We need this for West Seattle desperately too!!!

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 › »