Microhousing Resolution

Signatures 669 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 14 › »

1. 1
   Name: Carl Winter on Dec 11, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Joseph Pentheroudakis on Dec 11, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Laura Kiely on Dec 11, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 11, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Jaisri Lingappa on Dec 11, 2012

   Comments: We need a level playing field for developers. All buildings with dozens of separate residents should be subject to the same review and undergo design review to get neighborhood input.

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Molly Sharp on Dec 11, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Collin Monda on Dec 11, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: John Fox on Dec 11, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Radost Dimoca on Dec 11, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Jeff Haire on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Maureen OConnell on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments: I have been in real estate a long time, in two states. When a city realizes that their well-thought out public reviews of projects is being skirted, they TYPICALLY, and RESPONSIBLY, protect the owners of the area by changing the ordinance while they issue a moratorium on applications for projects until the ordinances are corrected to REALIGN THE ORDINANCES WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN and the desire and will of both the PEOPLE and the GOVERNMENT. Please do the responsible thing, and stop these aPODments from taking over what are otherwise homogenous neighborhoods, much beloved by those who have INVESTED in property and who reside there PERMANENTLY, happily with those who are more transient or do not desire to own who live in buildings that have undergone full review and are good neighbors (ample parking, green space, set backs, and the like). Thank you.

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Tom Potter on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Tom Potter on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Margaret Kitchell on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Patrick Tompkins on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: John Akamatsu on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Spencer Walsh on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Sue Corcoran on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments: I'm disgusted with the high density for no purpose mentality of the city council. The dealmaking with the rich. Passing higher level buildings that are "green" but not green. It is bullshit and we are watching you. This is not manhattan. We live here for a reason. If I want to live in NYC, I'll move there.

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Stacey on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Erie Jones on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Jules James on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments: Honesty before density. Count Units Properly.

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Joshua Noble on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Lisa Kothari on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Bill Bradburd on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Kerri Adams on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments: As with anything concerning development it is about consideration and balance within and surrounding the impacted areas.There are so many Seattleites who care deeply about our city and have great ideas and input for the betterment of us all.

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Chris Tremonte on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments: require parking!

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Roxanne Corff on Dec 11, 2012

    Comments: Please show some leadership to honor Capitol Hills quality of life. Please put a moratorium on Apodment Development, until we know what impacts the nineteen which are currently in the works have, and stop incentives to destroy more buildings to make Apodments.

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Nancy Code on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Nancy Code on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: David White-Espin on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Heidi Klinck on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Craig Bettles on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Vaibhav Bhandari on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Jennifer Woods on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments: We need the moratorium NOW. Irrevocable harm is being done.

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Rose Custer on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Paul Mason on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Lynda Gilman on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments: The zoning needs to be tightened up to address tbis

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Loren Brown on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments: These are not eight bedroom apartments just because they share a kitchen. That assertion is absurd. There is a limit of one unit per 800 square feet in L-3, and that should be upheld. An honest definition of a unit needs to be added to the zoning code.

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Lori Pomeranz on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Colette Gordon on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Richard Amster on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments: As an apartment dweller who has to park on the street, one of my main concerns is that the proposed building has no underground parking. Street parking will become extremely scarce!

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Rachel Buker on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments: please save our beautiful neighborhood from zoning loopholes

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Shilpen Patel on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments: Microhousing would destroy quality of life in Capital Hill

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: LeRoy Laney, III on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Judy Amster on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Pamela Taylor on Dec 12, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 14 › »