Skip to main content

The City finally buckled and agreed to restore the oversight we demanded. Our pressure forced them to stop fast-tracking these developments without community input. Stay alert because we need to watch them closely to ensure they actually follow through on these promises.

January 31, 2013

Microhousing Resolution

Microhousing Resolution

🏆 Won — 733 supporters Verified

Final supporters

A
Angela B.
J
jean j.
J
Jennifer S.
A
April A.
J
Jason T.
S
Someone
B
Betty B.
J
Julie M.
S
Someone
H
Hillary N.
+723 more
Started by Anonymous 13 years, 7 months ago

***SCROLL TO BOTTOM FOR TEXT OF RESOLUTION AND TO SIGN***


Also, PLEASE NOTE: The donation request is from the Ipetitions website AND NOT FROM Reasonable Density Seattle. You may ignore it and still sign. THANK YOU.


Capitol Hill Community Council Resolution on Microhousing

Whereas, in 1993, the City and the Neighborhoods jointly created a Design Review Process and Design Guidelines to ensure that new construction fit into the existing neighborhood context;

Whereas, the Neighborhoods agreed to increased growth with the understanding that neighborhood context would be protected, and that Neighborhoods would be able to meaningfully participate in the planning and development of their Neighborhoods;

Whereas, many years ago, the State of Washington and the City of Seattle enacted environmental protection laws and regulations that required the review of new construction for a range of environmental impacts;

Whereas, the City has repeatedly granted exemptions and raised thresholds for the application of Design and SEPA Review, such that an increasing number of buildings are being constructed with undefined environmental impacts, and in a style which clearly violates the existing neighborhood context;

Whereas, the City has set growth targets under the Growth Management Act, which are to be used to guide future development;

Whereas, the Capitol Hill Neighborhood has seen new construction that will result in the neighborhood exceeding the previously established growth and density targets: As of July 2012, Capitol Hill has met 92% of its growth target for 2004-2024, and when additional 380 permitted units are built, it will meet 130% of its growth target for the same period;

Whereas, a new type of construction referred to as apodments or microhousing, concentrated in the Capitol Hill Neighborhood, has proceeded under ordinary construction permitting procedures, exempt from Design Review, SEPA Review and Design Guidelines, and resulting in an increased density not previously established in Seattle's Land Use Code;

Whereas, the pace and nature of development of apodments in the Capitol Hill Neighborhood, as well as other neighborhoods around the City, deeply concerns the neighborhood, for the reasons stated above;

Whereas, the development of apodments has been enabled by a DPD interpretation, Director's Rule 7-83, of the meaning of the phrase "dwelling unit", and under which eight separate living units have been classified as a single “dwelling unit”, thereby lowering the unit count for the proposed building;


Be it resolved by the Capitol Hill Community Council:

We ask that the Seattle City Council, using its authority to establish interim measures under the Washington State Constitution Article 11, Section 11 and the Growth Management Act, Chapter 36.70A, to declare that an emergency exists, and to declare a moratorium on the approval and construction of any more apodments or microhousing in the Capitol Hill Neighborhood, or anywhere else in the City, until such time as the City Council can further clarify the meaning of "dwelling unit", and stop its application to the development of apodments, a type of construction it was never meant to address, to make the development of apodments subject to Design and SEPA Reviews, and to pass an ordinance to ensure that all multifamily buildings that contain the same or similar unit count are subject to the same set of development standards and design guidelines.

Updates

January 18, 2013

We just hit 500 signatures. The Seattle City Council can no longer pretend we are not watching them dismantle our neighborhood character for the sake of these developers.

Reached 500 supporters

January 17, 2013

Reached 100 supporters

December 12, 2012

33 Comments

A
April Atwood
10 years ago Featured

Seattle could learn a lot from Bellevue in slowing down development until infrastructure can catch up, and especially in forcing developers to pay for their fair share of infrastructure.

S
schlem
12 years ago Featured

This is affecting us personally, as 4-story mansions mushroom around us, filling 90% of their lot size. This is poor planning and urban management manifest!

J
Jana Royal
12 years ago Featured

Density if fine but it needs to be balanced with quality of life. Set backs, limits on height and quality transit are all important for density to work long term.

K
Karen Barrett
12 years ago Featured

Exemptions that allow buildings higher than average and minimizing lot set backs, does nothing for quality of life in Seattle where we desperately need to maximize the amount of daylight that reaches our pedestrian areas. Take away the little sunshine we get and face dealing with disturbing psychiatric results in the future. If you want people to LIVE in Seattle, be sure it is Liveable.

A
Andrew Propst
12 years ago Featured

I live in Ballard and have seen rampant development and increasing density without corresponding infrastructure and transportation options resulting in increasing commuting time. I am concerned that there has not been adequate oversight of development.

B
Beverly Wagner
12 years ago Featured

My block in Ballard is being overwhelmed with tall building that take up most of the square feet of the lot. These ugly buildings are not in keeping with a feeling of neighborhoods. It does not create a friendly landscape. There is no process for neighborhood input. Notices are sent out after the building is completed. Where is the input process? Thank you for listening.

J
Jason Thornberry
10 years ago

The new developments in Ballard have diminished the character of it--they are a blot on the landscape. They are driven by forces living outside of Ballard and they are helping to make this an inhospitable place to everyone.

B
Betty Bigelow
11 years ago

None of this new housing is affordable to anyone who is not bringing down nearly 6 figures a year, based on the price of the units as an indication of income. Stop lying about what all this out of control growth really means.

Share Petition

Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact

Copy link or share directly

Instagram
QR Code