Petition to make Mental Health and Addiction Recovery Matter in Florida

Signatures 5143 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 103 › »

1. 151
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 22, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Jennifer Cavalari on Feb 22, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 22, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Nadine Mills on Feb 22, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: ROBERT G LERNER. MD on Feb 22, 2012

   Comments: BLUE SHIELD IN CALIFORNIA IS DOING THE SAME KIND OF THING IN CALIFORNIA BY SHIFTING ITS MH MANAGEMENT FROM USBH TO MAGELLAN WITH AN ACCOMPANYING 22% REDUCTION IN REIMBURSEMENT RATES TO PROVIDERS.!!

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 22, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Robert Vandiver on Feb 22, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Richard Metzner on Feb 22, 2012

   Comments: Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Florida should be held accountable for this, but we are likely witnessing a widening trend of discrimination against mental health patients to get around parity requirements.

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Daniel Rapp on Feb 22, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Wilfredo Gonzalez on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Sybil Rice on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments: Should not discrimate against Mental Health patients or susbstance abuse addiction.

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Elliott Martin on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: John Manring on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: David Kemp on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Ellen Koch Utley, Md on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: DR H DEAN SHULL JR on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Paul Kardon on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Alexander Isaac, MD on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments: Depriving citizens of good care is in nobody's interests, except the stockholders of the predatory healthcare company.

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Christine T. Finn, MD on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Amy S Hoffman MD on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Joseph C. Napoli, MD on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments: Mental health issues have long been stigmatized by society. It is a health issue like any other and should not be unfairly discriminated against.

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Alexandra Sawicki, MD on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments: I am a physician and resident training in psychiatry in Atlanta, GA.

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Virginia Buki, MD on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Deborah B Matro MD on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments: As a psychiatrist, I know that mental health is as much an illness as heart disease etc. It must be insured equally.

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Anita Clayton, MD on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Richard H Workman Jr, MD on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Rob Williams on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments: As a Christian minister and pastor of churches for the past 38 years, I know how crucial mental health is to one's physical health and our community's wellbeing. Parity of insurance coverage for mental and physical health is essential. How can the two be discriminated anyway?!

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Mark Gloss on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Allison Y. Hall, M.D. on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments: This is clearly a discriminatory action. Effective mental health care requires highly trained clinicians. Discriminatory reimbursement cuts severely limits access to such clinicians.

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Michael J. Morejon on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Colleen Coyle on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments: Parity in mental health is important. Insurance companies should be required to demonstrate that they have complied with the requirements of the Act and the interim final regulations and that the non-quantitative treatment limitations they impose do not discriminate against mental health and substance use patients. The government has studied the cost of compliance and determined it is insignificant and that it actually may reduce the cost of health care in the long run.

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: David R. Diaz, MD on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Bertram Warren on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Teresita McKeown on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments: do not discriminate against a vulnerable segment of our population.

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Rachel Ritvo on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Gretchen Enright, M.D. on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: JORGE A AGUINAGA on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: DIANNE DEL PIZZO ARNP on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Karen Teston on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Jeffrey Reddout on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments: Slashing payments to providers has led to much smaller pool of available therapists. New Directions has dishonestly listed providers as part of their network (such as myself) who are NOT part of their network, perhaps to make it appear to subscribers that their network is adequate when it is not.

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Elizabeth V. Getter, MD on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Lisa A. Rone on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Jessica Daniels, MD on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Todd Eisenberg on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Marlin R. Mattson, M.D. on Feb 22, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 103 › »