Signatures 1564 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 32 › »
-
101
Name: John Angus on Jan 19, 2007Comments: The City of Kingston has rarely been enlightened , but this is a new low point. As an ex Director of the Museum, I know how many hours of FREE labour it took to maintain this facility. The City simply can't afford to close it if it wants to keep it.Flag
-
102
Name: Greg Holland on Jan 19, 2007Comments: I can hardly believe that the municipality of Kingston has not attended to the matter of a lease renewal with the Marine Museum of the Great Lakes. The Marine Museum of the Great Lakes not only preserves our extensive history on the lakes but also is a significant tourist draw for the Kingston area. In a time where Kingstons downtown area has been under pressure to bring people in the idea of loosing the museum seems ludicrous to me.Flag
-
103
Name: Jeff Falcon on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
104
Name: David Clement on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
105
Name: Lori Williamson on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
106
Name: Patrick Coleman on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
107
Name: James Hillen on Jan 19, 2007Comments: This is an opportunity for the new council to support important cultural and historical property, materials, and information. Museums a few and far between in Southeastern Ontario outside of Ottawa. I would see failure to make and keep this museum strong is another way that Kingston municipal government talks the talk but does not walk the walk in it's tourism advertising campaign except for Hockey, hockey, hockeyFlag
-
108
Name: Ross Cameron on Jan 19, 2007Comments: The idea is wrong. Before anything happens the people of Kingston need to see as plan. There are undoubtedly issues that are not in the open that may have to do with due diligence, public safety and the like. Kingston is a historic city. If there's one activity the city of Kingston should support beyond basic municipal responsibilities such as paving roads, it is protection and promotion of heritage.Flag
-
109
Name: Ross Cameron on Jan 19, 2007Comments: The idea is wrong. Before anything happens the people of Kingston need to see as plan. There are undoubtedly issues that are not in the open that may have to do with due diligence, public safety and the like. Kingston is a historic city. If there's one activity the city of Kingston should support beyond basic municipal responsibilities such as paving roads, it is protection and promotion of heritage.Flag
-
110
Name: Gregory Scott on Jan 19, 2007Comments: Any attempt to oust the Marine Museum without full disclosure by the City and The Marine Museum board is wrong . In the absence of a city position the museum board should post the situation from their current perspective.Flag
-
111
Name: David H. Page on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
112
Name: Betty Anne & David Field on Jan 19, 2007Comments: The more interesting sites for general public access the better. Attracting/Enabling the public to make use of the waterside location is a higher-order good in terms of facility and land use planningFlag
-
113
Name: John D'Esterre on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
114
Name: Margaret D'Esterre on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
115
Name: Chris Coupland on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
116
Name: Stephanie Wong on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
117
Name: Jeff Chiang on Jan 19, 2007Comments: The marine museum is a valuable asset to Kingston as a tourist attraction and an important part of the Kingston community.Flag
-
118
Name: Guy White on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
119
Name: Mike Wheeler on Jan 19, 2007Comments: No only should the Marine Museum stay where it is but the surrounding site should be developed into a historic site by draining and exposing the historic Dry Dock and having the Alexander Henry within the dock as part of the istoric attraction. The are is also the site for the Wren's memorial garden and it is where the memorial plaques for the corvettes built in Kingston are located. What more could we ask for for a marine historic site.Flag
-
120
Name: Peter Scholes on Jan 19, 2007Comments: One only has to see the interest on the faces of the many children who we guide thru' this pricelessmuseum to know the importance of future generations understanding of the importance of the Great Lakes, and the important role Kingston has played in this evolution.Flag
-
121
Name: David Holland on Jan 19, 2007Comments: Save the Marine Museum!Flag
-
122
Name: Lise Holland on Jan 19, 2007Comments: Save the Marine Museum!Flag
-
123
Name: Genevieve Holland on Jan 19, 2007Comments: Save the Marine Museum!Flag
-
124
Name: Dennis Morris on Jan 19, 2007Comments: Save the Marine Museum!Flag
-
125
Name: Stephen Holland on Jan 19, 2007Comments: Save the Marine Museum!Flag
-
126
Name: Stephen Longo on Jan 19, 2007Comments: Save the Marine Museum!Flag
-
127
Name: Jessica Longo on Jan 19, 2007Comments: Save the Marine Museum!Flag
-
128
Name: Jake Longo on Jan 19, 2007Comments: Save the Marine Museum!Flag
-
129
Name: Dr. Robin W. Dawes on Jan 19, 2007Comments: The Marine Museum of the Great Lakes is an important cultural and historical resource, and its location is entirely appropriate - in fact, it is ideal. What planned usage by the City of Kingston could be more important to the people of Kingston and of CanadaFlag
-
130
Name: MacKenzie Longo on Jan 19, 2007Comments: Save the Marine Museum!Flag
-
131
Name: Christopher McNaught on Jan 19, 2007Comments: It would be an unconsionable and retrograde step for both the heritage/tourism quality of Kingston, and its unique maritime legacy, if the Museum were uprooted by bureaucratic inertia: how will tomorrow's children learn about the Great Lakes story; what will American and other tourists think of a community which lets its past slip awayFlag
-
132
Name: Leslie MacPherson on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
133
Name: Donna Lusk on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
134
Name: ROGER ECCLESTON on Jan 19, 2007Comments: As the Kingston waterfront continues to be devastated by high-rise development, I believe it is of absolute importance to maintain every possible vestige of waterfront heritage. The Marine Museum, dry dock, & Alexander Henry are critical aspects of our past & must be protected.Flag
-
135
Name: ROGER ECCLESTON on Jan 19, 2007Comments: As the Kingston waterfront continues to be devastated by high-rise development, I believe it is of absolute importance to maintain every possible vestige of waterfront heritage. The Marine Museum, dry dock, & Alexander Henry are critical aspects of our past & must be protected.Flag
-
136
Name: Anne-Marie Johnson on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
137
Name: Anne-Marie Johnson on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
138
Name: Aarin Crawford on Jan 19, 2007Comments: It is important that the site stay in its current location due to the historical value of the place.Flag
-
139
Name: Patrick McCormack on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
140
Name: James Pritchard on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
141
Name: Kim Robitaille on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
142
Name: Lorraine Pierce-Hull on Jan 19, 2007Comments: Kingston's waterfront is already cut up. Unlike many cities the general population has poor access to it. The Marine Museum is one of the few wonterfront uses that makes sense and keeps the water open for use by all.Flag
-
143
Name: Robert & Juliet Hutchings on Jan 19, 2007Comments: This heritage site should preserved where it is, so much effort and passion has gone into its maintenance, Lets cherish what we have and support rather than be so ready to tear appart.Flag
-
144
Name: Brian S. Osborne on Jan 19, 2007Comments: I strongly endorse the continued presence of the MMGL on Kingston's downtown waterfront as an important part of Canada's heritage and Kingston's culture and new-economy. It's support should be a City priority.Flag
-
145
Name: John Coleman on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
146
Name: Liz Whelpdale on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
147
Name: Peter And Shirley Fortier on Jan 19, 2007Comments: what better purpose for a small segment of our waterfront than a museum celebrating our maritime past Shame on our politicians to even consider abandoning this important facility!Flag
-
148
Name: Liz McNaught on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
149
Name: Jana Clark on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
150
Name: Jana Clark on Jan 19, 2007Comments:Flag