Signatures 2402 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 49 › »
-
101
Name: Neil Bell on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
102
Name: Anonymous on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
103
Name: B Graham on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
104
Name: Christopher Ward on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
105
Name: Anonymous on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
106
Name: Gary McKenna on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
107
Name: Philip Unsworth on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
108
Name: Kate Allison on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
109
Name:
Jackie Jones on Oct 8, 2012
Comments:Flag -
110
Name: Simon Curtis on Oct 8, 2012Comments:Flag
-
111
Name: Chris Cheng on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
112
Name: Ian Clayton on Oct 9, 2012Comments: shamefullFlag
-
113
Name: J Twist on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
114
Name: Rob Young on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
115
Name: Anonymous Facebook user on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
116
Name: Andrew Wall on Oct 9, 2012Comments: This is a beautiful building in a prime location and deserves to be saved.Flag
-
117
Name: Andrew Wall on Oct 9, 2012Comments: This is a beautiful building in a prime location and deserves to be saved.Flag
-
118
Name: Jon Gardner on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
119
Name: Tara Moloney on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
120
Name: John Grogan on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
121
Name: Andrew Unsworth on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
122
Name: Daisy Nicholson on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
123
Name:
Robert Casey on Oct 9, 2012
Comments: This building is one of the first things visitors to the city see on arrival at Piccadilly. It is appalling that such a potentially stunning building has been allowed to rot for 26 years, and a disgrace that the Eric Pickles rejected MCCs compulsory purchase order in 2011.Flag -
124
Name: Lewis Davis on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
125
Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
126
Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
127
Name: Robert Hindle on Oct 9, 2012Comments: A ridiculous situation that threatens a truly magnificent building. Let's hope a sympathetic development happens before it falls beyond repair!Flag
-
128
Name: Daniel Thompson on Oct 9, 2012Comments: save the firestation!Flag
-
129
Name:
James M Lowe on Oct 9, 2012
Comments: Really shameful how some of any cities iconic / famous buildings get left alone for the sake of "modern" architectureFlag -
130
Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2012Comments: I worked for Britannia for a year almost 20 years ago and they were shocking then and I'm sure shocking now. They are certainly greedy and only care about personal gain.Flag
-
131
Name: Joshua Muldoon on Oct 9, 2012Comments: we should save all these glorious old Manchester buildings.Flag
-
132
Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
133
Name: Steve Bourne on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
134
Name: Gareth on Oct 9, 2012Comments: A wonderful building that desperately needs savingFlag
-
135
Name: Andrew Simpson on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
136
Name: Kathleen O'connor on Oct 9, 2012Comments: As stunning building that needs attentionFlag
-
137
Name: Anonymous on Oct 9, 2012Comments:Flag
-
138
Name: Kiran on Oct 10, 2012Comments:Flag
-
139
Name: Anonymous on Oct 10, 2012Comments:Flag
-
140
Name: Jill Lovecy on Oct 10, 2012Comments:Flag
-
141
Name: Loz Kaye on Oct 10, 2012Comments: Once again, we can see how developers have been allowed to neglect the heritage and assets of our city of Manchester. This is particularly shameful in this case given the bulding itself and that it lies right where people come in to the city.Flag
-
142
Name: Matt Reynolds on Oct 10, 2012Comments:Flag
-
143
Name: Harriet Simpson on Oct 10, 2012Comments:Flag
-
144
Name: Mark Reid on Oct 10, 2012Comments: One of the few beautiful historic buildings left, currently a poor gateway to the city.Flag
-
145
Name: Harriet Hughes on Oct 10, 2012Comments:Flag
-
146
Name: Cristian Haddad Reaney on Oct 10, 2012Comments:Flag
-
147
Name: Andy Etches on Oct 10, 2012Comments:Flag
-
148
Name: Malcolm Birkett on Oct 10, 2012Comments: Clearly Brittania Hotels do not have the funds to complete the plans to convert this iconic building into a hotel or are cynically waiting for it to get to a stage where it is not economically viable to repair and will have to be demolished?Flag
-
149
Name: Anonymous on Oct 10, 2012Comments:Flag
-
150
Name: Susan Madron on Oct 10, 2012Comments: It is time this building was saved, it is beautiful as well as historic.Flag