Signatures 435 total
-
1
Name: Brian Chojnowski on Sep 10, 2007Comments: I don't want to say goodbye to the 135!Flag
-
2
Name: Emily Masalski on Sep 10, 2007Comments: Keep the 135 Clarendon/LaSalle Express running!Flag
-
3
Name: David Winner on Sep 11, 2007Comments: Makes us look bad when Chicago is looking for the Olympics!!Flag
-
4
Name: Evan Henschel on Sep 11, 2007Comments: Why obstruct employees from getting to workFlag
-
5
Name: Gena Gibbs-Gore on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Apryl Ehmann on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Amanda McGlone on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Nicole Bihlmeier on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Ashlyn Gorlin on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Lisa Levandowski on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Anonymous on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: Naomi Shapiro on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Rebecca Israilevich on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Erica Sanft on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
15
Name: Erica Sanft on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
16
Name: Stacey Hankins on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Christopher J. Novak on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Ruhi Kusumgar on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
19
Name: Josef Zeigler on Sep 11, 2007Comments: Effective public transportation in the third largest metropolitan city in the United States is crucial for people who use it as well as for those who do not. Our economy and environment, especially, are dependent upon us. Please work with us -- the citizens of our state -- to make it work. Thank you and Best Regards, Josef Zeigler.Flag
-
20
Name: M. Lynch on Sep 11, 2007Comments: At a time when environmental issues are at a heightened awareness, you want to decrease public transportation, ultimately increasing the number of vehicles on our streets This definitely doesn't align with any green city plans or support a congruent engineering structure for our roadways. Remember, the buses in harm of elimination are those taken by many of your high bracket tax payers. Instead of sending empty 151s down the Drive, why not keep a few express buses for those farther away from the LoopFlag
-
21
Name: Julie on Sep 11, 2007Comments: Public transportation is important to Chicago, unlike most other major cities. The great thing about this city is the fact that it feels smaller because it is easy to get around. Don't change that.Flag
-
22
Name: Jayme Lutsch on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Kristin Amelse on Sep 11, 2007Comments: We need the #135 and #134 bus routes to continue for many riders who work in the Loop. The routes are congested enough. I cannot see the #156 being able to accommodate any extra riders.Flag
-
24
Name: Annie on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Jackie Manley on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: Jenna Klatell on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
27
Name: Jason Laurie on Sep 11, 2007Comments: Eliminating these bus routes would be disastrous for the business community.Flag
-
28
Name: Eileen Ferguson on Sep 11, 2007Comments: I commute to work on the bus, which is usually full. Eliminating express runs will put more people on other bus lines which are already full and slow, or worse yet, put more people in cars for increased congestion and pollution. I have a car, but choose to use the bus so I can sit and read and ignore traffic. There's a limit to how much time I will spend every day standing and packed in like sardines. Don't eliminate the heavily used routes.Flag
-
29
Name: Cameron Walker on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: Anonymous on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
31
Name: Anonymous on Sep 11, 2007Comments: The 135 already has trouble accomadating all of the people who utilize that bus route - what are we going to do when it no longer is available The 145 and 146 can not pick up the slack.Flag
-
32
Name: Anonymous on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
33
Name: Clarice Norin on Sep 11, 2007Comments: The commuters shouldn't be in the middle all the time.Flag
-
34
Name: Bryn Packard on Sep 11, 2007Comments: Affordable and reliable public transportation is not a luxury, it is a requirement. Thousands of people who have no other transportation alternatives depend upon it daily and cutting service would dramatically reduce their quality of life. Reliable public transportation is also imperative to a cleaner environment and a less congested city, it keeps people out of fossil fuel burning cars that crowd streets and highways. Please take the long view and continue to invest in maintaining and improving our public transportation options.Flag
-
35
Name: Jeffrey A. Krol on Sep 11, 2007Comments: The game between Madigan and Blagojevich does not involve the best intersts of the citizens of Illinois. We need this public transit to support our livelihoods and education. Keep the 135 bus among others running.Flag
-
36
Name: Stephanie Madia on Sep 11, 2007Comments: Save the 135Flag
-
37
Name: Anonymous on Sep 11, 2007Comments: Keep the bus people away from the train!Flag
-
38
Name: Jim Jedlicka on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Virginia Morin on Sep 11, 2007Comments: Why is it we can find the money to murder people in other countries and can't find it for basic services hereFlag
-
40
Name: S. Israilevich on Sep 11, 2007Comments: Healthcare for everyone is important. The people who need the most help in that area also need help GETTING TO THE HEALTHCARE via Public Transportation! Look at the big picture, It's not about Chicago and down-state. It's about all aspects of peoples's lives. Higher fares in the Chicago area hurts a large number of struggling people the most. People who have to use public transportation. What they save in health benefits will be spent daily on getting to work and trips to the doctor. Please re-Think ! A re-thinking Democrat, S.I.Flag
-
41
Name: Hugh Mulligan on Sep 11, 2007Comments: ridiculousFlag
-
42
Name: Gregg Lavine on Sep 11, 2007Comments: The 135 is always packed, standing room only. Why would you eliminate this cash cow for you It goes to show how poorly run the CTA must be if you are considering eliminating this route. If anything, you should be adding MORE 135s.Flag
-
43
Name: Anonymous on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
44
Name: Cory Lanham on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Anonymous on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: John O'Brien on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Anonymous on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
48
Name: Kevin O'Keefe on Sep 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
49
Name: Anonymous on Sep 11, 2007Comments: People need to get to work. There is no viable alternative for anyone from Belmont to Irving to get to LaSalle. If we all get on the 156, it won't have any room for anyone else further down the line. Legislators - grow up.Flag
-
50
Name: Anonymous on Sep 11, 2007Comments: Public Transit should be funded by the public's government.Flag